KaskadskyjKozak

I do pay for tags. For my car. Lick sack.

AND REGRESSIVE OIL COMPANY SHILLS!

Smoke 'em if you got 'em!

If you listen to fools, The mob rules.

Then I heard a voice, Said you got a choice, The hammer or the nail.

Great flick about the Pueblo incident. I love the "Hawaiian good luck sign" scenes. :-)

Wasn't that the Soviets ?

A Modest Proposal

Unfu* ingbelievable. Why are all you guys: the libtards (is that a libtard approved word?) that is, those who are always slamming anyone who supports the country and desires us to remaining strong both militarily and economically: so ready to rush into mass murder in violation of our treaties, core beliefs, and history? This is not something to be joking on, although Choada and Rob appear to not be joking on it despite some jokes tossed in between the blood rage sentences. You guys really shock me. Tossing this around so glibly, like you are changing your underwear or choosing a new fast food sandwich, is a bad bad thing IMO. No joke about it. Advocating mass murder of both enemies and innocents together on a scale even Hitler or Stalin could not dream about is sick beyond crazy. Whats the extreme opposite of funny? It's so wrong. Stop. Dude, satire.

That's part of growing up. Not against the law.

Why couldn't the pig officer let you proceed? What were you doing wrong, exactly?

So you support exploitation, eh? The reason Americans will "not do the work" is because the pay is shitty and there are no benefits - something you can get away with with slave labor. If Mexican nationals are to work here then there should be a guest workers program that ensures all labor laws are followed, including minimum wage and benefits, and that the workers are taxed.

It's other people who are slaves to commercialism, killing the planet buying the latest unneeded toys.

Well, gee, we'd think a jack-of-all trades, self-aggrandizing manic delusional such as yourself would be able to just figure this all out for yourself.

Understatement of the century. And you gotta love the "we".

Cool, I can also blame the ACLU for allowing those a-holes to knock on my door and annoy me.

But this is not what happened. It's not clear from your link "what happened". There's just a comment about some people who either had been convicted sex offenders or viewed child porn complaining about the law: "The statue [sic] was challenged by several men who had completed prison sentences for possession of child pornography or for sexual abuse of a minor. "

So, the ACLU must be defending them... that's what they are best at defending - buggery, not to mention white supremacists and any other POC walking God's Green Earth.

Parole boards. We are not talking about dangerous "ideas" but people who have been convicted of the most disgusting and egregious crimes against children. The guy in this test case was guilty of receiving child pornography online. The government decided to keep him indefinitely 6 days before his release. Are you saying there is no chance of a slippery slope here? That it's OK to indefinitely detain someone who downloaded illegal child porn, but NOT someone guilty of violent assault? Weird. If it makes sense to keep this guy locked up to protect us, then why shouldn't they protect us from other dangerous criminals? NOT FAIR!!! In the case of child molestors, you have 1) high recidivism rates and 2) linkage between behaviors. If someone is convicted of molesting a child, is in prison, and then views child porn before release, I have no problem with extending his sentence - indefinitely if need be.

Parole boards. We are not talking about dangerous "ideas" but people who have been convicted of the most disgusting and egregious crimes against children. They have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have committed these crimes once (or more times). This is beyond a hypothetical determination. Spread to other areas? Sorry, but this class of human detritus is all we need to focus on. No need to bring in bullshit hypothetical slippery slopes.

These types of offenders, while serving their sentences, are treated, evaluated, and observed for years. During this time and intense scrutiny, there is ample opportunity to decide if the offenders are likely to be a threat, should they be released.

In order for j_b to be a douche-nozzle, he would have had to have been inside an orifice, which I am certain he has never been. Unless you mean an unused douch-nozzle, in which case, I concur.

You can start with the Catholic priests molesting alter boys, you ACLU fucktard moron. To some, they'd be equivalent, I suppose. But then, that same group also eats its own poo. Is this where you start replying to your own postings 3, 4, even 5 or more times?

You can start with the Catholic priests molesting alter boys, you ACLU fucktard moron.