RuMR

the one thing that most greatly improved your climbing ability... PS: Besides just actually going climbing...

See Rudy!

I was only answering Distel's question... I think its only been pinkpointed?? But don't know for certain...Clint's website suggests a 5.14 rating to actually redpoint the route...

yes...it did, by several people...

FOR THE FULL SHIZZLE PRESS ME!

Potential lines to be freed locally...

Don't you mean boLt chopper??

...

Gotta agree here...Ramuta is where its at...Dave Page? Ha, might as well go to Michelin...if he does the work, its only ok...if one of his "helpers" does it, throw them in the trash can...ruined two pairs of shoes of mine...i will never go back there... GO TO RAMUTA if you want them done right and cheap...

Got cut , pounded , smashed, cooked , baked , fried , humbled and awe-inspired all at once!!! Jdog was on a sending spree... Met a lot of really cool climbers and have a name for a new route...The DAWG'S BOLLOCKS! Basically, the classic 5.10-tour...couldn't be beat and am counting the days until i go back...

ahhh...good ol' IDF... My roomate trained hard in that...wouldn't ever mess w/ that guy, period...

Bug...that is weak...of course if you deliberately insert yourself into a sketchy situation, come prepared... IE, don't head up an rp seam w/ gold camalots...

Well, gotta second that one...west virginia freakin' ROX!!!

No no no Peter...its mono and two finger pockets...sheeesh...

Have a good one, greg

Not yet...but soon we will be moving on to politics and then religion and then bolting...wanna come along??

I'm at you!

Once again greg, you've extrapolated what i've said to the extreme... Tell you what i'll play that game...why doesn't the government, just hand every 18 year old a rifle and pistol when they register...fuck the screening, hell any crimes they did pre 18 are expunged, so it wouldn't show on their records anyway...so let's all start off fresh and armed...sounds good to me... and yeah...i do think there are a lot of dumb assholes out there...for that matter i might just be one of them...

Minx:

You know Greg, the original intent of our forefathers was that only WHITE males could vote, not females or blacks...Going back to these documents as unchangeable is laughable to me...they couldn't have possibly foreseen EVERYTHING in our future... It is your opinion that the background check is sufficient, just like it is mine that it is not. Most of the accidents and crimes with guns out there (and i can dig for statistics, or not) are by legally purchased guns...so obviously, there is a systemic flaw. Should a Hinkley have had a psychological review? What do you think? You think its ok??? Regarding acting rational: YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS GETTING EMOTIONAL about this issue...i have refrained from super foul (a few f-bombs) language and personal attacks...I have stated that i owned guns, have shot them and see nothing wrong w/ gun ownership...I have also stated that i do not believe that everyone should be entitled to own one...You are right...those are my opinions...and i stand by them...I have arrived at my thoughts on this after much reflection and have withdrawn my support for the NRA...say what you will, but you come across as a raving maniac on this issue and appear to be the one who has had an emotional chord struck... As far as i'm concerned the general public does not have the respect due to firearms and should not be entitled to them...

"also while you are busy researching feel free to help me out by letting me know how the libs are removing my rights in an equivilant manner to patriot act 1 and 2."

Greg...i said a SERIOUS background check...one week...bfd...I don't believe that the background checks are sufficient... Why am i talking out of my ass regarding the bill of rights? I DON'T CARE WHAT IT SAYS, i think gun ownership should not be a right, period... Why don't you 'splain to me where i said something that is factually wrong???????? Go ahead, quote me... and chill the fuck out greg..."You make me fucking sick"???? I'm trying to have a rational talk about something and it makes you sick??? Get a grip...i never said no gun ownership...

But my common sense tells me to buy a tank. Your common sense doesn't. So whose common sense is right??

Our glorious, dead-letter Constitution states that the "right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." I know this will infuriate you statist heathens with an ax to grind, but 'not infringed' means if you're tall enough to put your money on the counter, you can have a gun. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it you anti-gun anal buccaneers. Aside from the absurd "tall enough to put your money on the counter" extrapolation, you still didn't answer the question about how you go from "arms" to "handgun." If you can interpret the word "arms" to mean extend to handguns why can't I also interpret universal healthcare from the right to life? Oh--and just in the interest of full disclosure, I own a handgun. RBW...that is the funny thing isn't it?? I've owned guns most all of my life...and i'm not opposed to gun ownership, per se...but some folks get all hot and bothered if you try to regulate it...