If an American kills an Iraqi, that's good, but if a Chinese kills a Tibetan, it's bad. And if an Iraqi kills an Iraqi, well, that's just the way it goes.
That's not what I said at all.
Every war involves death of civilians. Every single one.
Certain regimes, however, go far beyond such losses in their concerted, organized, purposeful slaughter of innocent civilians. The Turks did it to the Armenians, Stalin to the Ukrainians, the Nazis to the Jews, and Pol Pot to Cambodians. Add the Chi Comms to the latter list. The US doesn't even come close to qualifying on this list of infamy.
Get a clue Canuck moron, or STFU.
How many people do you have to kill to make it genocide? Cause the US is up to 600,000 in Iraq. Maybe they can stay there until they tie with the Turks in Armenia or something. Then they can have their own trading card and stuff. Or maybe GWB is going to stay in Iraq until he's killed more Iraqis than Saddam did? Talk about dick measuring