Fairweather

Bring it on little man. Youza real tuff guy!

you mean a WHACK-OFF?????? OK. Alright. Yes. It was me...

Insomuch as posters here embrace the label it likewise applies to TK. As for dictionary work; might I suggest you look up "Tax" and pass your findings along.

Yea right. His manifesto reads like Prole's, j_b's, and TTK's posts right here on your site. http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt "INTRODUCTION 1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in "advanced" countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in "advanced" countries. 2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy. 3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later. 4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence: it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can't predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society. ". . .

I'm glad Choada's on board though. I'd hate to think about what he'd do if he was really mad at Obama.

As for the Postal Service; well, they're gonna help us rebuild after B-Ho brings on the apocalypse don't you know.

Um, you do understand that pie chart was bogus, don't you? No. Probably not.

If there was a Wiki entry for "American Terrorism", you'd not find an entry coming from the Left for nearly thirty years. On the other hand, there's no shortage of anti-abortion shooters, militia-nuts, gay-bashers, Federal Building and Olympics parade bombers, and other assorted wackos. All from the Right. How does historical reality jive with your statement above? Or is your criticism based on the fact that liberals don't act on their "wishes"? You are the dumbest fuck on this site. ...and lets not forget your Earthfirst! friends too.

Did you really elect this guy? Props to George at ABC. Looks like Barry might be losing the media soon. Tragic. [video:youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFxomW3RqYY

Classic libtard thought. This post alone illuminates the true depth of your ignorance. You gonna be at the rope up by any chance?

I disagree completely. Jefferson would have left it to the states at most. Hell, he didn't even bother to show up for the constitutional convention!

Tvash: I'm an attorney and he's right. The U.S. Constitution allows the government to build Interstate highways, clean up toxic waste dumps, and regulate safety in the workplace but they have no business getting involved in health care. The Supreme Court resolved this question in the 1896 case of what's-wrong-with-these-people vs. say-what. Get a clue. Matt. I haven't said congress has no power to enact legislation regarding health care. My comments were in response to TTK's contention that health care is a "fundamental right". Clearly, it isn't.

Speaking of torture; I'm going to the Puyallup Fair today. Under protest. We'll talk later, governmentcocksucker.

You're not very bright

You're not taking about enumerated rights though. In fact, I doubt you're even talking about implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause. What you're talking about is amending (or, IMO, violating) our constitution--and if Congress and the states approached health care reform via this process, I would approve of the legality at least.

Can you show me where that lies in the US constitution? Equal protection under the law, of course, lies in the 5th and 14th amendments, but this is no more related to health care than is the right to food and shelter--as found in the old Soviet constitution.

What other private industries shall we nationalize on the way to your utopia?

I'll get more specifics from her when she comes back on Monday if you'd like. Let me know. On another note, I just opened today's mail and it turns out that my employer needs proof that my wife of 25 years is really my wife--or they're kicking her off my policy effective September 30th!

Hopefully it was a legitimate injury and you weren't just milking the system like liberals are so fond of doing.

Pretty much what I'm saying. Huffingtonpost and Limbaugh Letter are two sides of the same coin.

That's a funny statement coming from someone who reads Huffingtonpost to stay informed.

Not sure what company you applied with. My daughter finished college last year and got a $160/mo policy with BCBS of Washington that covered her pre-existing ACL tear and the required surgery. The only activities they asked her about were skydiving, hang-gliding, and, of course, smoking. Who did you apply with again?

Chewack River Ranch. Summer of 1986. Groundhog. 6 feet. 12 gauge. #4 shot. What a mess. My wife didn't speak to me for three days. My brother worked summers there and bagged over 130 of the little buggers with a .22 magnum rifle.

I grew up with a single father. I was only about 9 or ten years old when his date at the time canceled out on a Niel Diamond concert at the last minute. My dad looked at me, two tickets in hand, and the rest is history. My first concert.

What would be really cool would be to go back in 2 or three years, take another photograph, and see if you could note any changes in the wave patterns.