Fairweather

There were only 73 theses on your web page--a full 22 fewer than Martin Luther produced! So did you read Dr. Easterbrook's main paper? Seriously: I give you peer-reviewed science from a practicing environmental geologist/glaciologist at a reputable university and you give me a HOBBY PAGE from a supposed "ex-physicist who only recently "became interested in global warming." Amazing. You are exactly like a born-again. There's no amount of science and reasonable debate that will cause you to second guess your beliefs--which is exactly what you should be doing in any event.

Spoken like a missionary quoting Bible verses. No original thought required.

Do you realize how simpletonesque that sounds? You're saying that correlation equals causation--and there are plenty of other candidates for causation. Few of them studied adequately as yet. Yes. We've added .008% CO2 to the total. NOT significant.

Um, you didn't read any of it, did you. Easterbrook's resume: http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~dbunny/resume.htm

I think the Obama Administration could care less about prosecuting these terrorists. In their bizarre world, they no doubt believe the discovery process required in a public trial will reveal the true extent of Bush's "crimes".

Here's a scientist/professor from WWU who sees things differently: http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~dbunny/research/global/index.htm More to help temper your fanaticism: http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~dbunny/research/global/geoev.pdf No doubt Feck's attention span will take him into the first or second sentences before he remembers that the IPCC preacher-man told him reading actual statistics was against UN scripture--at which point he will promptly denounce the good professor as a veterinarian crackpot. I'm only expecting slightly more from j_b. After all, he did spend a full two quarters at Western before his status lapsed from academic warning into permanent suspension.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=obama ... ... The Messiah for brain-dead Democrats. 'Cmon now Pota. Git cha tits up!

Don't you mean, j_b, that he's a

Just what I thought: She's never had a real job.

Precisely why they need to let him go. Precisely why they need to let him go. recisely why they need to let him go. Precisely why they need to let him go. You know, Kev, I have rarely stooped to your level. In fact, you may have noticed I hardly pay you any attention at all--but you can't possibly be serious about your posts. This man admits (Pre waterboard) to planning and carrying out the murder of almost 3000 of your fellow Americans. I do think you personify the vast majority of Democratic voters though--and it's very sad.

Were it not for BHO's 10+% unemployment... Shall I do a search on Raquel Rolnik? I'm sure she's a fascinating read. As for the UN; again--only plural this time: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=libtard&defid=1454864

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=libtards

Were any of them water-boarded like Khaled? Where will an impartial jury be found? How will jurors be kept safe? What evidence will be allowed/disallowed? Will the trial be open?

Why? Do you think the Supreme Court is "out there" too? My position that this particular terrorist--above all others--doesn't deserve to touch American soil is actually pretty main-stream. Now, if you're talking about my belief that Obama will pay the heaviest political price; well, we'll just have to wait and see...

Military Tribunals. Good enough for SCOTUS.

Yet another corrupt Dem goin' to jail: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/13/ex-rep-jefferson-sentenced-bribery-friday/

BHO and the Dems can kiss Congress goodbye. And if this trial goes awry--which it likely will--he may not even finish his term. Can you say the I-word? http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8360018.stm

Still waiting... [video:youtube]

Good show covering all of North America. Some of his slides are fading out. I hope he can find time to digitize/restore them some day.

To a much, much smaller degree. That Allende won election on his 4th (?) try with a plurality less than 40% certainly makes the case for runoffs, IMO. In any event, elected socialist leaders--and elected fascists too--have repeatedly demonstrated an unwillingness to subject themselves to the inconvenience of reelection. I'm curious if this would have been the case with Allende had he not been deposed, but history pretty much gives us the answer to this question.

And Castro has been better in this regard exactly how? who knows how Cuba and Castro would have evolved if no embargo, no invasions and other attempts had taken place. These policies are as much responsible for Cuba's evolution as Castro himself. Ah, I see. You're saying that making excuses for bloody dictators is acceptable under certain circumstances. In a transitional sense, I agree. I'm not condemning you here; just trying to clarify the thought process. I would point out that Chile is now a much better place in which to live than Cuba--but that is debatable too, I suppose.

...and your "breathing space" thesis is wholly unsupported--or even definable. As for Allende, I would just say that I consider the nationalization of private industry and the confiscation of privately-owned land to be a criminal act. I'm not sure that excusing Castro's brutality (for whatever reason) while condemning Pinochet's is, in any way, a demonstration of objectivity.

And Castro has been better in this regard exactly how?

Didn't vote for him either. Sorry.