num1mc

Probably 3/4 to 1 1/8, with 3/4 or 7/8 being most likely. Don't think it would be 5/8, and 1" is getting pretty big

No one was as good looking as the FA http://www.modelmayhem.com/2742611

Long awaited second ascent, but unfortunately any TR will involve a pay to view Go-Pro movie by the famous Euro alpinists who jetted over here for the SA of this famous test piece http://cascadeclimbers.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/950227/1

Ditto.

Carla's email address isn't working

http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/seattletimes/obituary.aspx?n=joe-firey&pid=168993913

The name seems familar https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/bitstream/handle/1773/22832/Rybolt_washington_0250O_11430.pdf?sequence=1

Not effectively [img:left]http://web.mst.edu/~rogersda/military_service/Subs%20at%20North%20Pole.jpg[/img]

Old mines or the Salton Sea

Yea, I've spent days straight putting in Hilti anchors

Just that they have a smaller cross section than equivalent rod that would go into a nominal 1/2 glue whole, and have a very ad hoc garage built look to them.

That's what I thought and was afraid of. I thinks those will be the next unsightly junk. They are affordable, but I think they will be shown to be a poor substitute for SS all thread and a standard brake metal hanger.

What the stainless apparatus?

Excuses, excuses, excuses [img:left]http://www.cascadeclimbers.com/plab/data/500/medium/015_NA_rs.jpg[/img]

Don't know, but the sign says RCW 77.15.435 So you either type, read or see poorly

Kelly Bush doesn't make the rules. This should be directed to the Super or Regional level, or the the pols.

1985 by Peter Croft, not Pat Timson

I've sent three e-mails since the end of the shut-down, and only today received notice that they will respond to me shortly

How can that be, I thought it was on BLM land You think wrong http://www.fs.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsinternet/!ut/p/c5/04_SB8K8xLLM9MSSzPy8xBz9CP0os3gDfxMDT8MwRydLA1cj72BTSw8jAwgAykeaxcN4jhYG_h4eYX5hPgYwefy6w0H24dcPNgEHcDTQ9_PIz03VL8iNMMgycVQEAIzTHkw!/dl3/d3/L2dJQSEvUUt3QS9ZQnZ3LzZfME80MEkxVkFCOTBFMktTNUJIMjAwMDAwMDA!/?ss=110601&ttype=recarea&recid=39154&actid=29&navtype=BROWSEBYSUBJECT&position=BROWSEBYSUBJECT&navid=110130000000000&pnavid=110000000000000&cid=FSE_003705&pname=Central+Oregon+-+Skull+Hollow+Campground

Skull Hollow is a USFS campground

Exaggerate much?

Probably more like the 1920's or thirties. Definitely by the late forties and early fifties with people like Georege Senner and the Molenaars, there was a system of climbing rangers. But the need for "Climbing Rangers" on Rainier, in Alaska, the Tetons and Yosemite is miles different than the need on Bruce's Boulder.

Just why do we need climbing rangers?

It's not the individuals doing the study who are cooking the books, it's the NPS who is counting passive resistance and failure to comply as assaults against LE. The social scientists on the NPS payroll just lack the balls to tell LE that they are a bunch of pussies. But this way the DOI can complain about the ongoing plaque of assaults against their LEO's, and get M-16's so they can enforce order in the Forbidden gully. According to the report, Yellowstone had the highest number of LE assaults. Having spent several July's in Yosemite in the 80's, you could get a beat down by the bikers there. It's hard to imagine that Yellowstone is such a difficult place for LE, unless you count hurt feelings as a serious attack