Jump to content

Free Speech Quiz


tvashtarkatena

Recommended Posts

This is an exercise I've been giving college level immigrant students: If you were a Supreme Court Justice, would you allow or disallow the following:

 

6432191721_a8d2ff74db_o.jpg

 

T shirt worn by a high school student at school

 

 

6432191679_8a6b8d9939_o.jpg

 

Banner at an off campus high school sponsored function

 

 

6432191641_d06b82b20e_o.jpg

 

T shirt worn by a high school student at school

Edited by tvashtarkatena
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

As long as all "political" speech was limited I guess it would be ok to ban all - though that starts getting into gray area of what is "political" speech and do students have an inherent right.

 

The bong one strikes me as insensitive to some religious belief and the Bush one is just crass. But these seem like great conversation pieces for students.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm OK with allowing them all.

 

Cannibis T-shirt: Making a statement of personal belief/opinion. Is it hate speech? No, totally a free speech issue. Don't like it? Get over it.

 

Bong hits 4 Jesus: Off campus, so not affiliated with any institution, just a gathering of citizens. Is it hate speech? No, totally a free speech issue. I don't really know what their intended message and audience are, but so what? If it were on campus without the school's consent, maybe the institution might have something to say about it...

 

@ Jim's comment regarding religious (in)sensitivity: Is the above banner more insensitive than the Westboro Baptist Church numbskulls' banners/signs picketing against GLBTs at funerals? To me, no it's not. Although I intensely dislike and abhor what those WBC assholes do at the services of those being laid to rest (veterans or otherwise), I still find that their douchebaggery is protected under the First Amendment (so did the SCOTUS, on appeal). They're just being incredibly stupid, extremely insensitive, and downright crass to take a funeral and make it a platform from which to broadcast their (hate) message, like that's going to earn them any converts or gain them much support for their "crusade." That insensitivity and stupidity alone, in my view, diminishes whatever message they, or anyone behaving similarly, might be trying to convey.

 

GW poster: Again, making a statement of personal belief/opinion. Is it hate speech? Some might think so, but it really isn't. It's still totally a free speech issue. Although, I do agree with Jim that it's just plain crass. Everybody loves to bash Bush, for any number of reasons. The same can be said of Obama, or any other political personality. They are all subjects (nay, targets) of political cartooning ever since Gutenberg invented the modern printing press. It's all just political opinion. Don't like it? Get over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pat,

Since I brought it up, throw this one in front of your students and tell us what they say...

 

Should this be allowed at funerals?

 

tumblr_lfm61lQbcy1qef4sd.jpg

 

(FYI, the SCOTUS upheld WBC's appeal in an 8-1 decision in 2008, in Snyder v Phelps)

 

SCOTUS got this one right, I believe.

I believe they did, too, despite the inherent hate contained in their message. I would be interested to know what your students think of the case...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

School sponsored? Really? Was it Evergreen? :)

 

Seriously, if the school sponsored it, then that's their choice and right. It's still First Amendment protected free speech, no matter how you look at it.

 

The school banned the banner. Hence the case.

But the kids took the banner off-campus. School "control" ends => free speech => end of story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

School sponsored? Really? Was it Evergreen? :)

 

Seriously, if the school sponsored it, then that's their choice and right. It's still First Amendment protected free speech, no matter how you look at it.

 

The school banned the banner. Hence the case.

But the kids took the banner off-campus. School "control" ends => free speech => end of story.

 

hee hee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pat,

Since I brought it up, throw this one in front of your students and tell us what they say...

 

Should this be allowed at funerals?

 

tumblr_lfm61lQbcy1qef4sd.jpg

 

(FYI, the SCOTUS upheld WBC's appeal in an 8-1 decision in 2008, in Snyder v Phelps)

 

SCOTUS got this one right, I believe.

I believe they did, too, despite the inherent hate contained in their message. I would be interested to know what your students think of the case...

 

I'll spring this one on them next time. Also the American flag flap in CA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also the American flag flap in CA.
Which flap is that? Is that the one where some Latino students at a CA high school hoisted a Mexican flag on the school's flagpole, and a bunch of American students took umbrage with it? Or are you talking about a different flap?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your original question is inherently flawed. Supreme Court Justices don't allow or disallow anything they affirm, remand, or vacate lower judgements; or just refuse to grant certiorari.
Yes, technically the original question may have been flawed, but what I think everyone understood the question to be was...

"If you were a Supreme Court Justice, and this case was appealed up through the lower courts and is now before the SCOTUS for a decision, how would you rule upon it?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bunch of students wore American flag T shirts on Cingo de Mayo, presumably to poke the large, latino student population in the eye. The school has a history of racial tensions. The school told the students to turn their shirts inside out. So far, the courts have backed them up.
"Them" being the students? Or the school?

 

Racial tensions aside, in my opinion this should be no different than allowing the WBC folks' the right to protest at funerals. This is still totally a free speech issue to me. The American-flag-wearing students should not have been forced to remove their shirts. Looks to me like the school administration kowtowed to the Latino student population in order to avoid an altercation. That's a pretty poor motivational basis, if you ask me.

 

I know that the decisions reached in Snyder v Phelps and the CA high school flap were made by two different courts, but I see a distinct lack of consistency in these two rulings as they currently stand.

 

It's OK for the WBC to drag out signs and banners and protest loudly, condemning GLBTs in a most flagrant and insensitive manner, in effect endorsing hate speech.

 

Yet, it's not OK for students to wear a T-shirt with an imprint of an American flag upon it on a day wherein another culture celebrates its national heritage.

 

The question to ask oneself here is this: "Were any Latino students who wore T-shirts espousing their national heritage also required to turn their shirts inside out?" If the answer to that question is "no", then this is a distinct case of discrimination and the court's decision is flawed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...