Fairweather Posted November 1 Author Posted November 1 On 6/15/2015 at 7:27 PM, olyclimber said: Actually, Elon Musk, if he was running for president, might just be the guy we would both vote for Now THIS actually aged pretty well. Quote
olyclimber Posted November 1 Posted November 1 43 minutes ago, Fairweather said: Now THIS actually aged pretty well. I know I was just thinking about this post! 😂.  Was even thinking of dredging it up myself.  Still a fan of a few things: SpaceX and the scientists and engineers there.  Also how Tesla helped make EVs mainstream.  The solar power stuff is awesome too, but over priced and not especially innovative.  Starlink has been awesome for some select use cases, but I really don’t like the pollution of the night sky. The man himself though, he is unfortunately a huge disappointment as a human being, even if you set aside his political affiliations. Turned out to be a real turd.   I accept the shame of being naive about who he really is. Quote
Fairweather Posted November 2 Author Posted November 2 His free speech beliefs and anti-censorship efforts. The horror! You were right in 2015--don't go soft now, amigo! Quote
JasonG Posted November 2 Posted November 2 I'm not sure if any of us would handle that sort of wealth, and the platform it provides, very well. It is sort of mind boggling what is possible when you have unlimited money and visibility.....and nobody to say, "uhhhh, hold on a second Elon." Quote
olyclimber Posted November 2 Posted November 2 Maybe we all just to take a bunch of ketamine and it will all make sense. Quote
Fairweather Posted November 3 Author Posted November 3 Democrats: "This whole free speech thing could get out of hand." Quote
bedellympian Posted Thursday at 08:00 PM Posted Thursday at 08:00 PM (edited) On 11/2/2024 at 10:00 PM, Fairweather said: Democrats: "This whole free speech thing could get out of hand." More accurately: "Russian government AI bots and billionaires who own media corporations made up a bunch of lies and used their massive wealth to make sure that was all most Americans heard. So we should probably limit foreign influence and corporate powers so that actual facts are findable and the voices of American citizens are at the heart of political discussions determining the future of this country." I found this video to be helpful. Â Edited Thursday at 08:02 PM by bedellympian Quote
Fairweather Posted Saturday at 08:32 AM Author Posted Saturday at 08:32 AM (edited) Nonsense. When you hear Democrats say "misinformation' or "disinformation" what they really mean is "anything we disagree with or doesn't fit our worldview." The solution to bad information is good information. Unfortunately, New Left Democrats and "progressives" see regulation and censorship as their preferred solution. It's a big reveal. And when they claim "Russian bots," again, they're just seeing a bogey man or walking away for an argument they just lost. Â As for the billionaires, well, do you mean George Soros? He's buying up hundreds of radio stations across America. Not to mention local prosecutors. Bill Gates? Or the other billionaires who financed Kamala's campaign? Mark Cuban? Oprah? They raised almost double what Republicans did. And still lost. Because, it turns out, voters understood they were the real threat. Edited Saturday at 08:41 AM by Fairweather Quote
bedellympian Posted Sunday at 04:52 AM Posted Sunday at 04:52 AM 19 hours ago, Fairweather said: And when they claim "Russian bots," again, they're just seeing a bogey man or walking away for an argument they just lost. Link: FBI Press Release Quote: "This Russian activity is part of Moscow’s broader effort to raise unfounded questions about the integrity of the U.S. election and stoke divisions among Americans, as detailed in prior ODNI election updates." But the FBI is just liberal propaganda, because that's what you say for "anything we disagree with or doesn't fit our worldview." It's a two way street I'm afraid. 20 hours ago, Fairweather said: Or the other billionaires who financed Kamala's campaign? And there is a difference between donating to a PAC for documented campaign expenses as any American can do (not that I think it's fair how much any billionaire can spend or agree with the amount of $$$ in our elections) vs. Musk firing thousands of moderators at X and throttling websites he disagrees with to drown out alternate view points. If "The solution to bad information is good information." then I guess he thought he'd just get rid of the good information. So much for "setting the truth free" as he so eloquently fibbed. Link Quote
Fairweather Posted Sunday at 08:12 AM Author Posted Sunday at 08:12 AM (edited) Musk fired thousands of liberal censors at Twitter. And rightfully so. The only "alternative viewpoints" that were being censored at Twitter were conservatives. They even banned a presidential candidate in 2020. Famous Musk quote: "turns out you don't need a lot of employees when you're not busy censoring everyone." What X has become is a virtual free-for-all, true. But that's the price. I see plenty of crazy stuff both left and right. It's just amusing that mid-wit Democrats somehow think they're the smartest kids in any room they enter. This whole free speech and democracy thing isn't working for them. Arrogance. The FBI? Comey? McCabe? Strock/Paige? Sheesh, they've been political since J Edgar Hoover. We did just fine without them for the first 150 years of the Republic. We'll do just fine when they're gone. Edited Sunday at 08:23 AM by Fairweather Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted yesterday at 05:11 PM Posted yesterday at 05:11 PM I remember i used to want to jump on all these threads and argue endlessly. I'm so burnt out after the last decade or more. I don't really care anymore.  Quote
olyclimber Posted yesterday at 05:23 PM Posted yesterday at 05:23 PM 5 minutes ago, KaskadskyjKozak said: I remember i used to want to jump on all these threads and argue endlessly. I'm so burnt out after the last decade or more. I don't really care anymore.  Same brother. I mean I care, but I don't see any fruit in conversations like this here or anywhere on the Internet. I would prefer to talk about positive things that we have in common. Like being in the mountains, adventure cycling, or floating the Yukon, or that kind of thing.  Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted yesterday at 05:26 PM Posted yesterday at 05:26 PM 1 minute ago, olyclimber said: Same brother. I mean I care, but I don't see any fruit in conversations like this here or anywhere on the Internet. I would prefer to talk about positive things that we have in common. Like being in the mountains, adventure cycling, or floating the Yukon, or that kind of thing.  I guess I care too, but I can care to myself and not on the internet. Totally agree about talking about pleasant things and what we have in common. Arguing makes me feel bad. Talking about mountains and adventure makes me feel good. Quote
Fairweather Posted 13 hours ago Author Posted 13 hours ago (edited) I don't want to talk If it makes you feel sad I've been gone the better part of a decade--and return only to find Spray has gone silent; gentrified. Forty eight pages--flapping in the wind. Is this a NW devolution? Where's the mojo? The spirit that once drove Spray also drove us into the hills--and back here to tell our tales. And brawl. The mountains look different in the PRWA these days, for sure. Bureaucrat weekends, full of rules. Little white squares. Feministas and cucks. Not the way it used to be. Libtards on Parade.   Edited 13 hours ago by Fairweather Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted 35 minutes ago Posted 35 minutes ago (edited) I agree things have changed. So have I. And I've aged. I find solace and joy finding less travelled paths and enjoying that solitude while it still lasts. I have been remiss in posting TRs here. I should though. I had a horrible turnaround on Chaval last summer, and that tale might amuse some, in a Schadenfreude kind of way. I did have the mountain to myself. (well, me and my son did). I need to go back before the masses/IG crowd discover it Edited 34 minutes ago by KaskadskyjKozak Quote
Bronco Posted 29 minutes ago Posted 29 minutes ago (edited) I'm certainly a little more protective about where I expend my declining energy these days.  Fighting on the internet is not as fun as it was in the early 2000s.  Those were the glory days of spray. Now I spend my time trying to  how to recover from training injuries.  Spray now    Spray in the 2000's Edited 28 minutes ago by Bronco Quote
olyclimber Posted 7 minutes ago Posted 7 minutes ago 27 minutes ago, KaskadskyjKozak said: I agree things have changed. So have I. And I've aged. I find solace and joy finding less travelled paths and enjoying that solitude while it still lasts. I have been remiss in posting TRs here. I should though. I had a horrible turnaround on Chaval last summer, and that tale might amuse some, in a Schadenfreude kind of way. I did have the mountain to myself. (well, me and my son did). I need to go back before the masses/IG crowd discover it You’ve been getting after it, as I see from Strava! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.