Jump to content

Libtards on Parade: Alcoholism, Corruption, Murder


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

bitches been whining about the fall of camalot since way back :)

 

"If the Confederacy falls, there should be written on its tombstone: Died of a theory."

Posted (edited)

 

"If the Confederacy falls, there should be written on its tombstone: Died of a theory."

 

Not sure how much thought old JD put into that one--or how CSA theory differed from 1787 intent. Are any alternative theories to the status quo of today palatable? No.

 

 

Edited by Fairweather
Posted

Meanwhile

 

The GOP-dominated House passed a bill that effectively prevents scientists who are peer-reviewed experts in their field from providing advice — directly or indirectly — to the EPA, while at the same time allowing industry representatives with financial interests in fossil fuels to have their say. Perversely, all this is being done in the name of “transparency.”

 

 

http://inhabitat.com/house-passes-bill-that-prohibits-expert-scientific-advice-to-the-epa/

Posted
Meanwhile

 

The GOP-dominated House passed a bill that effectively prevents scientists who are peer-reviewed experts in their field from providing advice — directly or indirectly — to the EPA, while at the same time allowing industry representatives with financial interests in fossil fuels to have their say. Perversely, all this is being done in the name of “transparency.”

 

 

 

http://inhabitat.com/house-passes-bill-that-prohibits-expert-scientific-advice-to-the-epa/

 

It's so cute that a site 'moderator' chooses to change the thread title in such a disgusting, inflammatory way. :wave:

 

 

Posted
Meanwhile

 

The GOP-dominated House passed a bill that effectively prevents scientists who are peer-reviewed experts in their field from providing advice — directly or indirectly — to the EPA, while at the same time allowing industry representatives with financial interests in fossil fuels to have their say. Perversely, all this is being done in the name of “transparency.”

 

http://inhabitat.com/house-passes-bill-that-prohibits-expert-scientific-advice-to-the-epa/

 

Well, if it's been reported in inhabit.com, then we know it must be a true and unbiased account. :lmao: Given the EPA's penchant for imposing it's undemocratic/administrative power at will, it's refreshing to see them brought to heel from time to time.

 

 

 

Posted

everyone knows the epa is evil, shit, it's all right there in ghostbusters!

 

i thought conservatives were supposed to love the epa? didn't that nixon feller create it? hardly a panty-waist bleeding heart, that one...

Posted (edited)
I certainly hope you and your family aren't vaccinated. It causes autism ya know. At least that's what Jenny McCarthy says, and she knows more than most scientists.

 

http://www.buzzfeed.com/ellievhall/11-things-that-jenny-mccarthy-has-said-about-vaccines#.sqJbKX5e

 

Mostly the libtards who aren't vaccinating their brood nowadays.

 

But, AK, speaking of vaccinations, I'd certainly want want a booster shot if I sat on your couch. You recently posted one of the few photos I could actually smell.

 

[img:center]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-eDt8x6EwWBA/UrdGL9zGAlI/AAAAAAAAEOw/nETikTn8o4U/w1314-h985-no/20131222_120437.jpg[/img]

 

Edited by Fairweather
Posted
I certainly hope you and your family aren't vaccinated. It causes autism ya know. At least that's what Jenny McCarthy says, and she knows more than most scientists.

 

http://www.buzzfeed.com/ellievhall/11-things-that-jenny-mccarthy-has-said-about-vaccines#.sqJbKX5e

 

Mostly the libtards who aren't vaccinating their brood nowadays.

 

But, AK, speaking of vaccinations, I'd certainly want want a booster shot if I sat on your couch. You recently posted one of the few photos I could actually smell.

 

[img:center]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-eDt8x6EwWBA/UrdGL9zGAlI/AAAAAAAAEOw/nETikTn8o4U/w1314-h985-no/20131222_120437.jpg[/img]

creepy. jesus, your non sequitur reminds me of everything i hate about my parents :noway:

Posted

AlpineK - generally it's left wing nuts that are anti-vaxxers, and anti-GMO. Nice try though.

 

Stupid opposition to Science covers both ends of the political spectrum, as does stupidity in general.

 

 

Au contraire

 

 

Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.

 

 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives

Posted

Proof positive that on the innernutz, nobody knows if you're a dog.

 

But dogs are all about love, so maybe not.

 

In any case, I wouldnt expect many invitations to dinner to flow from such karmic sharting.

 

The porcine world - Pressurized Liquid Brown's fan base - might appreciate the anally bilious, but I'd have to defer to Polish Bob for further analysis. Does a boar love a bore? And a boorish one at that?

Posted

AlpineK - generally it's left wing nuts that are anti-vaxxers, and anti-GMO. Nice try though.

 

Stupid opposition to Science covers both ends of the political spectrum, as does stupidity in general.

 

 

Au contraire

 

 

Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.

 

 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives

 

Wow, this is a real eye opener. Nothing like an IQ test administered by soft scientists to boost a libtards' sense of self worth--and boil away all the individual gifts a child possesses. Please, AlpineK, do tell me these youngsters had their skulls properly measured! 9_9

Posted

When you've got all the answers there's less to think about, I reckon.

 

The best thing about conservative kids is watching them turn liberal after a wee bit of brainwashing. It seldom takes much - just a little data is usually all that's needed.

 

 

Posted

AlpineK - generally it's left wing nuts that are anti-vaxxers, and anti-GMO. Nice try though.

 

Stupid opposition to Science covers both ends of the political spectrum, as does stupidity in general.

 

 

Au contraire

 

 

Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.

 

 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives

 

And yet here you are with an IQ of 74. Of course there is the lifelong use of chronic to blame...

Posted

AlpineK - generally it's left wing nuts that are anti-vaxxers, and anti-GMO. Nice try though.

 

Stupid opposition to Science covers both ends of the political spectrum, as does stupidity in general.

 

 

Au contraire

 

 

Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.

 

 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives

 

Wow, this is a real eye opener. Nothing like an IQ test administered by soft scientists to boost a libtards' sense of self worth--and boil away all the individual gifts a child possesses. Please, AlpineK, do tell me these youngsters had their skulls properly measured! 9_9

 

AlpineK and Kevbone: two shining examples of liberal intellect.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...