ivan Posted February 23, 2015 Posted February 23, 2015 "the bilious bastards that wrote that on the internet know about as much about real spraying as they do about fornicating!" - indira gandhi Quote
ivan Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 if obama's a sith lord, The Force sure ain't all that strong w/ him. Quote
ivan Posted February 24, 2015 Posted February 24, 2015 bitches been whining about the fall of camalot since way back "If the Confederacy falls, there should be written on its tombstone: Died of a theory." Quote
Fairweather Posted February 25, 2015 Author Posted February 25, 2015 (edited) "If the Confederacy falls, there should be written on its tombstone: Died of a theory." Not sure how much thought old JD put into that one--or how CSA theory differed from 1787 intent. Are any alternative theories to the status quo of today palatable? No. Edited February 25, 2015 by Fairweather Quote
AlpineK Posted February 25, 2015 Posted February 25, 2015 Meanwhile The GOP-dominated House passed a bill that effectively prevents scientists who are peer-reviewed experts in their field from providing advice — directly or indirectly — to the EPA, while at the same time allowing industry representatives with financial interests in fossil fuels to have their say. Perversely, all this is being done in the name of “transparency.” http://inhabitat.com/house-passes-bill-that-prohibits-expert-scientific-advice-to-the-epa/ Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 26, 2015 Posted February 26, 2015 Meanwhile The GOP-dominated House passed a bill that effectively prevents scientists who are peer-reviewed experts in their field from providing advice — directly or indirectly — to the EPA, while at the same time allowing industry representatives with financial interests in fossil fuels to have their say. Perversely, all this is being done in the name of “transparency.” http://inhabitat.com/house-passes-bill-that-prohibits-expert-scientific-advice-to-the-epa/ It's so cute that a site 'moderator' chooses to change the thread title in such a disgusting, inflammatory way. Quote
AlpineK Posted February 26, 2015 Posted February 26, 2015 Uncomplimentary thread names from either side of the aisle seem to be standard practice in Spray. Just playing along. Quote
AlpineK Posted February 26, 2015 Posted February 26, 2015 There are interesting climbing related topics we could be talking about of course. http://pataclimb.com/knowledge/puzzle.html Quote
Fairweather Posted February 26, 2015 Author Posted February 26, 2015 Meanwhile The GOP-dominated House passed a bill that effectively prevents scientists who are peer-reviewed experts in their field from providing advice — directly or indirectly — to the EPA, while at the same time allowing industry representatives with financial interests in fossil fuels to have their say. Perversely, all this is being done in the name of “transparency.” http://inhabitat.com/house-passes-bill-that-prohibits-expert-scientific-advice-to-the-epa/ Well, if it's been reported in inhabit.com, then we know it must be a true and unbiased account. Given the EPA's penchant for imposing it's undemocratic/administrative power at will, it's refreshing to see them brought to heel from time to time. Quote
AlpineK Posted February 26, 2015 Posted February 26, 2015 I certainly hope you and your family aren't vaccinated. It causes autism ya know. At least that's what Jenny McCarthy says, and she knows more than most scientists. http://www.buzzfeed.com/ellievhall/11-things-that-jenny-mccarthy-has-said-about-vaccines#.sqJbKX5e Quote
ivan Posted February 26, 2015 Posted February 26, 2015 everyone knows the epa is evil, shit, it's all right there in ghostbusters! i thought conservatives were supposed to love the epa? didn't that nixon feller create it? hardly a panty-waist bleeding heart, that one... Quote
Fairweather Posted February 26, 2015 Author Posted February 26, 2015 (edited) I certainly hope you and your family aren't vaccinated. It causes autism ya know. At least that's what Jenny McCarthy says, and she knows more than most scientists. http://www.buzzfeed.com/ellievhall/11-things-that-jenny-mccarthy-has-said-about-vaccines#.sqJbKX5e Mostly the libtards who aren't vaccinating their brood nowadays. But, AK, speaking of vaccinations, I'd certainly want want a booster shot if I sat on your couch. You recently posted one of the few photos I could actually smell. [img:center]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-eDt8x6EwWBA/UrdGL9zGAlI/AAAAAAAAEOw/nETikTn8o4U/w1314-h985-no/20131222_120437.jpg[/img] Edited February 26, 2015 by Fairweather Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 26, 2015 Posted February 26, 2015 AlpineK - generally it's left wing nuts that are anti-vaxxers, and anti-GMO. Nice try though. Stupid opposition to Science covers both ends of the political spectrum, as does stupidity in general. Quote
ivan Posted February 26, 2015 Posted February 26, 2015 I certainly hope you and your family aren't vaccinated. It causes autism ya know. At least that's what Jenny McCarthy says, and she knows more than most scientists. http://www.buzzfeed.com/ellievhall/11-things-that-jenny-mccarthy-has-said-about-vaccines#.sqJbKX5e Mostly the libtards who aren't vaccinating their brood nowadays. But, AK, speaking of vaccinations, I'd certainly want want a booster shot if I sat on your couch. You recently posted one of the few photos I could actually smell. [img:center]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-eDt8x6EwWBA/UrdGL9zGAlI/AAAAAAAAEOw/nETikTn8o4U/w1314-h985-no/20131222_120437.jpg[/img] creepy. jesus, your non sequitur reminds me of everything i hate about my parents Quote
AlpineK Posted February 26, 2015 Posted February 26, 2015 AlpineK - generally it's left wing nuts that are anti-vaxxers, and anti-GMO. Nice try though. Stupid opposition to Science covers both ends of the political spectrum, as does stupidity in general. Au contraire Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 26, 2015 Posted February 26, 2015 Proof positive that on the innernutz, nobody knows if you're a dog. But dogs are all about love, so maybe not. In any case, I wouldnt expect many invitations to dinner to flow from such karmic sharting. The porcine world - Pressurized Liquid Brown's fan base - might appreciate the anally bilious, but I'd have to defer to Polish Bob for further analysis. Does a boar love a bore? And a boorish one at that? Quote
Fairweather Posted February 26, 2015 Author Posted February 26, 2015 AlpineK - generally it's left wing nuts that are anti-vaxxers, and anti-GMO. Nice try though. Stupid opposition to Science covers both ends of the political spectrum, as does stupidity in general. Au contraire Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives Wow, this is a real eye opener. Nothing like an IQ test administered by soft scientists to boost a libtards' sense of self worth--and boil away all the individual gifts a child possesses. Please, AlpineK, do tell me these youngsters had their skulls properly measured! Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 26, 2015 Posted February 26, 2015 When you've got all the answers there's less to think about, I reckon. The best thing about conservative kids is watching them turn liberal after a wee bit of brainwashing. It seldom takes much - just a little data is usually all that's needed. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 26, 2015 Posted February 26, 2015 AlpineK - generally it's left wing nuts that are anti-vaxxers, and anti-GMO. Nice try though. Stupid opposition to Science covers both ends of the political spectrum, as does stupidity in general. Au contraire Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives And yet here you are with an IQ of 74. Of course there is the lifelong use of chronic to blame... Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 26, 2015 Posted February 26, 2015 AlpineK - generally it's left wing nuts that are anti-vaxxers, and anti-GMO. Nice try though. Stupid opposition to Science covers both ends of the political spectrum, as does stupidity in general. Au contraire Analyses of large representative samples, from both the United States and the United Kingdom, confirm this prediction. In both countries, more intelligent children are more likely to grow up to be liberals than less intelligent children. For example, among the American sample, those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives Wow, this is a real eye opener. Nothing like an IQ test administered by soft scientists to boost a libtards' sense of self worth--and boil away all the individual gifts a child possesses. Please, AlpineK, do tell me these youngsters had their skulls properly measured! AlpineK and Kevbone: two shining examples of liberal intellect. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 26, 2015 Posted February 26, 2015 since it's "funny" and par for the course... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.