Whatcomboy Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 OK Lance used ped's all along. I get it. Never was one for sports hero's but I did like him winning races. Just another lying, mean, arrogant bum. Should run for congress. Quote
ivan Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 ain't no heroes in this world, just a large n' various menu of flawed meat-popsicles  ain't rode a bike since i grew hair on my nuts, but yeah, i'm all fucked up on the inside on this one Quote
bistro Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 Hey I like Lance alot, hes got BALL's But remember he was beating guys who were dopeing along side of him. He beat the dopers. I think seeing how during that period of time all the fastest people were dopeing and Lance Beat them, His titles should be given back. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013  It's time to legalize performance-enhancing substances and quit playing this charade  Quote
rob Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 Hey I like Lance alot, hes got BALL's But remember he was beating guys who were dopeing along side of him. He beat the dopers. I think seeing how during that period of time all the fastest people were dopeing and Lance Beat them, His titles should be given back. Â Quote
matt_warfield Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 (edited) Hey I like Lance alot, hes got BALL's But remember he was beating guys who were dopeing along side of him. He beat the dopers. I think seeing how during that period of time all the fastest people were dopeing and Lance Beat them, His titles should be given back.   It's Sir Lancelot except that despite all those victories he couldn't keep Sheryl Crow.  I agree with bistro mostly. Most were doping so the playing field was maybe level except some may have been better at it than others.  But before we pile on Lance, let's remember Lasse Viren (blood doping), Flo-Jo (who's world record in track may never be broken because of steroids), Mark McGuire and Barry Bonds in baseball and it is just a shaving off the tip of the iceberg.  Luckily, most climbers prefer mood altering instead     Edited January 16, 2013 by matt_warfield Quote
ivan Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 the ultimate solution  http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/update-all-drug-olympics/1198068/ Quote
jon Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 It's time to legalize performance-enhancing substances and quit playing this charade  At one point I thought this was the answer. When is it acceptable for your kid to start doping? 9th grade? I wonder how many kids on Bellevue Football would test positive? Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 It's time to legalize performance-enhancing substances and quit playing this charade  At one point I thought this was the answer. When is it acceptable for your kid to start doping? 9th grade? I wonder how many kids on Bellevue Football would test positive?  18 Quote
matt_warfield Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 (edited) Latest craze is Adurol. Popular with the youngsters and like most illegal drugs is available for those whose age is under 18 but their wallet has more than 18. Edited January 16, 2013 by matt_warfield Quote
jon Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 It's time to legalize performance-enhancing substances and quit playing this charade  At one point I thought this was the answer. When is it acceptable for your kid to start doping? 9th grade? I wonder how many kids on Bellevue Football would test positive?  18  And how do you enforce this? If kids know that going into college sports they are going to have to start doping, what is going to stop them from getting an early start? You can't say testing, because that clearly doesn't work. The problem I see is once you make this acceptable the trickle down affect is uncontrollable. Quote
matt_warfield Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 It's time to legalize performance-enhancing substances and quit playing this charade  At one point I thought this was the answer. When is it acceptable for your kid to start doping? 9th grade? I wonder how many kids on Bellevue Football would test positive?  If you allow the steroids that FloJo had that person would be just as dead as she is. Quote
rob Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 It's not about Lance doping, it's about Lance being the world's biggest cockhead about hiding it. How many people did he attack and attempt to destroy in order to keep his lie? Lots. He can eat a big bag of dicks for all I care. He's about a million times more douchy than landis, and everybody hates landis. Â Besides, he gave Sheryl Crow his cancer and then left her. Rude! Quote
rob Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 Also, he may have beat other cheaters, but Lance and the rest of the cheaters were all stealing from those who chose to race clean. And let me be clear, cheating is stealing. Â http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/9800888/Nicole-Cooke-retires-from-cycling-and-takes-aim-at-Tyler-Hamilton-and-Lance-Armstrong.html Quote
ivan Posted January 16, 2013 Posted January 16, 2013 i would not buy girl scout cookies from lance. even thin mints. Quote
rob Posted January 17, 2013 Posted January 17, 2013 I would probably buy somoas but I wouldn't be proud about it Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted January 17, 2013 Posted January 17, 2013 And how do you enforce this? If kids know that going into college sports they are going to have to start doping, what is going to stop them from getting an early start? You can't say testing, because that clearly doesn't work. The problem I see is once you make this acceptable the trickle down affect is uncontrollable. Â Well, I was talking specifically about professional cycling not college sports in general. I don't think cycling is that popular in US colleges. Â In any case we have all kinds of laws based on age: access to tobacco, alcohol, marijuana. Just because it is legal for adults does not mean you throw up your hands and give up when it comes to those underage. Quote
ivan Posted January 17, 2013 Posted January 17, 2013 It's time to legalize performance-enhancing substances and quit playing this charade i believe the sport of aid-climbing has already achieved this  i have little fear of teens throughout this fine land taking up etriers however, far too french! Quote
Whatcomboy Posted January 17, 2013 Author Posted January 17, 2013 It is all about the money. "Show me the money!" Always has been. And fame. And power. And... Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 17, 2013 Posted January 17, 2013 Read a little about how Lance treated whistleblowers (successful lawsuits, firings, threats) and you'll quickly realize what a psychopathic fucking tool he is. The world would have been a happier place if he'd just died of ball cancer. Â Â Quote
Stefan Posted January 17, 2013 Posted January 17, 2013 How does Oprah get the truth out of Lance while the legal system can't? Quote
stinkyclimber Posted January 17, 2013 Posted January 17, 2013 How does Oprah get the truth out of Lance while the legal system can't? Â I think Will Ferrell captured it in a tweet he sent yesterday (even tho Oprah denies it): "Lance Armstrong confesses to Oprah on drug use. What i$ it about her interview$ that make$ everyone $pill their gut$" Â Also: Lance probably knows he has a douche-bag problem (specifically, that the entire world thinks he is a douche-bag) and Oprah's specialty is helping douche's un-douche themselves, as long as they say the word "sorry." And LA needs to undouche himself because he desperately wants to continue his recent focus on elite triathaloning which he can't do until he can get himself unbanned from all Olympic-regulated sports. Undouching will lead to unbanning. I wish him the worst of luck. Asshat. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.