joblo7 Posted June 19, 2011 Author Share Posted June 19, 2011 ; he's gonna come out like a tiger and really whup some ass. But I doubt it. Someone suggested (here?) that on his first day in office a few of the Secret Service and CIA guys sat him down, showed him some secret classified footage of JFK's final moments, and said "Any questions, Mr. President?" that is very close to the reality. it was obvious with 'W' who was in on the joke from the start, so i dont think the new pres has anymore authority,,very high stakes right now on the planet, as never before. this time the true power is more concentrated then before yet remains very hidden...funny that 2012 is coming... who knew?......... it is like our destiny is running ahead of our ignorance, guiding it towards failure. hope i have.love i have .faith i have. we need divine intervention i guess. see whappens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted June 19, 2011 Author Share Posted June 19, 2011 (edited) anyone has any idea who actually runs the pentagon?? pres come and pres go , but pentagon is forever and is on a 50 year plan that no one can stop...i mean no one...in 2001 the only wall(out of 5(penta) ) that was damaged by some shit was the only one renovated some years before under clinton. so 5some years before , they new they needed one strong wall to trow some shit at.???under another pres...ummm deep.and what ? they are too cheap to fix the rest so it looks accident-like.?who is that cheap? Edited June 19, 2011 by joblo7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JosephH Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 Wait a minute - this whole thread turned on the notion of the Rothschilds being all powerful and able to give thumbs up or down on the lives of presidents. I post up that it's common knowledge a president ass-raped the Rothschilds without repercussions and you don't have any comment? Uh, cough, umm, moving right along, nothing to see here, ignore that man behind the curtain... 50 year plan... Ha ha ha, ha ha ha! Now that is rich, I mean really good. Dude, the pentagon doesn't have a four year plan let alone a 50 year plan. China has something close to 50 year plan - well, actually just a thousand year old map of China's influence. Get a grip, we and pentagon are rudderless by way of comparison. And let's see, 'dark', 'penta', 'hidden'? Hmmm, it all starts sounding vaguely subclinical and coded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted June 19, 2011 Author Share Posted June 19, 2011 this whole thread turned on you mocking others i think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted June 19, 2011 Author Share Posted June 19, 2011 http://futurestorm.blogspot.com/2010/10/cold-hard-facts-about-federal-reserve.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billcoe Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 http://futurestorm.blogspot.com/2010/10/cold-hard-facts-about-federal-reserve.html You have a severe shortage of actual facts joblo. I'd like to see a refutation of Josephs Mitterand comment (even though it's an opinion HE tossed out and didn't offer supporting links or documentation) How about bring some facts to the actual discourse on if the Rothschilds are controlling all this and murdering the Presidents who oppose them. Facts, they differ from opinions. Your link, for instance, was all opinion. The guy has it going very good till he got to this part: "The debt created by usury based sovereign debt is perpetual; it can never be paid off. The contract cannot be culminated. Any contract that cannot be culminated is an act of fraud. A contract based upon fraud is invalid from its inception. It would appear the national debt is not legally enforceable. I don't believe that is correct, nor does it take into account the balance of trade, which is what could actually easily and quickly pay off the national debt once the accounts are balanced and we stop spending more than we borrow. China, for instance, is in this enviable position right now and they are piling up dollars and euros hand over fist. It's a very well written opinion piece, with a lot of truth to it. But that says NOTHING about the main topic you brought here. You might be thinking it does, but by itself it doesn't, not at all. You pitched the idea that the Rothschilds are murdering Presidents who disagree with them. I'm as much a sucker for a good conspiracy theory as the next guy, but I want some real facts. The book "An Act of State" by William Pepper, Hardcover under $3.00 on Amazon.com LINK for instance, is loaded with facts, dates, names and testimony sworn in court by over 70 witness's and it conclusively proves that King was murdered by a consistory, and not by James Earl Ray despite the earlier conviction of Ray (who had claimed he was set up). The Martin Luther King murder conspricy was proven in a US court of law, (Ray, a low life set up as the patsy) never lived to enjoy full vindication though and died in prison. This book should be read by every citizen as it is beyond astounding and beyond shocking as it is true, proven by facts, dates, witness's. Your post, on the other hand - is the total opposite of that. Vague innuendo, no facts, opinion. When confronted with evidence that is contrary to your view, you ignore it and move onto the next subject. Go find some facts on this thesis and share them here, or admit that you are wrong about the Rothschilds controlling world banking and move on. Take care Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted June 19, 2011 Author Share Posted June 19, 2011 http://futurestorm.blogspot.com/2010/10/cold-hard-facts-about-federal-reserve.html You have a severe shortage of actual facts joblo. I'd like to see a refutation of Josephs Mitterand comment (even though it's an opinion HE tossed out and didn't offer supporting links or documentation) How about bring some facts to the actual discourse on if the Rothschilds are controlling all this and murdering the Presidents who oppose them. Facts, they differ from opinions. Your link, for instance, was all opinion. The guy has it going very good till he got to this part: "The debt created by usury based sovereign debt is perpetual; it can never be paid off. The contract cannot be culminated. Any contract that cannot be culminated is an act of fraud. A contract based upon fraud is invalid from its inception. It would appear the national debt is not legally enforceable. I don't believe that is correct, nor does it take into account the balance of trade, which is what could actually easily and quickly pay off the national debt once the accounts are balanced and we stop spending more than we borrow. China, for instance, is in this enviable position right now and they are piling up dollars and euros hand over fist. It's a very well written opinion piece, with a lot of truth to it. But that says NOTHING about the main topic you brought here. You might be thinking it does, but by itself it doesn't, not at all. You pitched the idea that the Rothschilds are murdering Presidents who disagree with them. I'm as much a sucker for a good conspiracy theory as the next guy, but I want some real facts. The book "An Act of State" by William Pepper, Hardcover under $3.00 on Amazon.com LINK for instance, is loaded with facts, dates, names and testimony sworn in court by over 70 witness's and it conclusively proves that King was murdered by a consistory, and not by James Earl Ray despite the earlier conviction of Ray (who had claimed he was set up). The Martin Luther King murder conspricy was proven in a US court of law, (Ray, a low life set up as the patsy) never lived to enjoy full vindication though and died in prison. This book should be read by every citizen as it is beyond astounding and beyond shocking as it is true, proven by facts, dates, witness's. Your post, on the other hand - is the total opposite of that. Vague innuendo, no facts, opinion. When confronted with evidence that is contrary to your view, you ignore it and move onto the next subject. Go find some facts on this thesis and share them here, or admit that you are wrong about the Rothschilds controlling world banking and move on. Take care "I don't believe that is correct, nor does it take into account the balance of trade, which is what could actually easily and quickly pay off the national debt once the accounts are balanced and we stop spending more than we borrow." there is the crux... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivan Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 "you can't reason people out of positions they were never reasoned into in the first place" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivan Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 this totally sounds like a job for 007...of g.i. joe...or maybe santa clause! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JosephH Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 futurestorm? Seriously? Could we just move right along, skip the middle part and get to where reptilian jews implant man-machine interfaces into newborns... P.S. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=mitterrand+rothschild+1981+nationalization Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted June 19, 2011 Author Share Posted June 19, 2011 i read it b 4. b good to stay right on topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted June 19, 2011 Author Share Posted June 19, 2011 http://futurestorm.blogspot.com/2010/10/cold-hard-facts-about-federal-reserve.html You have a severe shortage of actual facts joblo. I'd like to see a refutation of Josephs Mitterand comment (even though it's an opinion HE tossed out and didn't offer supporting links or documentation) How about bring some facts to the actual discourse on if the Rothschilds are controlling all this and murdering the Presidents who oppose them. Facts, they differ from opinions. Your link, for instance, was all opinion. The guy has it going very good till he got to this part: "The debt created by usury based sovereign debt is perpetual; it can never be paid off. The contract cannot be culminated. Any contract that cannot be culminated is an act of fraud. A contract based upon fraud is invalid from its inception. It would appear the national debt is not legally enforceable. I don't believe that is correct, nor does it take into account the balance of trade, which is what could actually easily and quickly pay off the national debt once the accounts are balanced and we stop spending more than we borrow. China, for instance, is in this enviable position right now and they are piling up dollars and euros hand over fist. It's a very well written opinion piece, with a lot of truth to it. But that says NOTHING about the main topic you brought here. You might be thinking it does, but by itself it doesn't, not at all. You pitched the idea that the Rothschilds are murdering Presidents who disagree with them. I'm as much a sucker for a good conspiracy theory as the next guy, but I want some real facts. The book "An Act of State" by William Pepper, Hardcover under $3.00 on Amazon.com LINK for instance, is loaded with facts, dates, names and testimony sworn in court by over 70 witness's and it conclusively proves that King was murdered by a consistory, and not by James Earl Ray despite the earlier conviction of Ray (who had claimed he was set up). The Martin Luther King murder conspricy was proven in a US court of law, (Ray, a low life set up as the patsy) never lived to enjoy full vindication though and died in prison. This book should be read by every citizen as it is beyond astounding and beyond shocking as it is true, proven by facts, dates, witness's. Your post, on the other hand - is the total opposite of that. Vague innuendo, no facts, opinion. When confronted with evidence that is contrary to your view, you ignore it and move onto the next subject. Go find some facts on this thesis and share them here, or admit that you are wrong about the Rothschilds controlling world banking and move on. Take care http://www.libertyforlife.com/banking/federal_reserve_bank.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JosephH Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 This would all go faster if you'd just get straight to the David Icke links... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted June 19, 2011 Author Share Posted June 19, 2011 did you check out the last link.? or u just tired. or offended? are you jewish maybe? jumping to conclusions i dont dream about? evil allies itself with evil. light seeks light. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_White Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 dont you 'LAD' me you ignorant boy. i posted historical links. Ah, late to the party, but I want to point out the "lad" goes with the britticism "barking mad." Would it work better for you if I declare that you're a whole bag of nuts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 dont you 'LAD' me you ignorant boy. i posted historical links. Ah, late to the party, but I want to point out the "lad" goes with the britticism "barking mad." Would it work better for you if I declare that you're a whole bag of nuts? I'm not sure about a whole bag of nuts, but he's definitely a few fries short of a happy meal... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil K Posted June 19, 2011 Share Posted June 19, 2011 I just want to say Hi to all the NSA and global banking cabal spooks out there who are, no doubt, following this thread verrrrrry carefully. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted June 20, 2011 Author Share Posted June 20, 2011 a couple years or so ago i went online for a week trying to get some info on the MRP2001 THINGY and i got on some sites that were talking strongly against the jewish abc/cbs/fox/ 'tever networks and the jewish guy who bought the towers few weeks before the renov and shit like that ... i posted a few strong comments to people who were buying the 'w' story as truth and those that went on lynch-the-beige-guys mode ... and next day there is a black sedan outside.next day different sedan same guys.i saluted them .. went on for a few days... now the kicker! the family that lives above me, in this nice nyc neighborhood, is muslim. the father is prominent businessman and church singer and leader. super sweet man. truly spiritual folks .i go for coffee , sweets and stuff. after 4-5 days the people upstairs start to get real abusive phone calls and threats. next day they call me in a panic cause someone is banging and yelling obscenities at the front door...after a couple weeks of this the kids 10/13 are freaked out. they plead with their parents to move back to turkey... i help with arrangements and they're gone. few days later my internet is down.. i go outside and switch the feeds to see if it fixes it. it did!! ooops(i was on their line) that sweet happy family basically got terrorized cause i went online and shot my mooot of. so i dont figure 'the baron' has got his best man on cc watching this , but there are gents around that go in preservation mode pretty freaking fast and past this info to next guy who amplifies it and on and on....i guess..till there is a car outside or you on some watchlist.. so i am polite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevbone Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 I am interested in what everyone else thinks? joblo7 has stated some interesting ideas on this and that. Conspiracy theories? Maybe maybe not. Instead of throwing joblo under the bus….how about giving your opinion of what happened king, Kennedy and so on? Or are you too afraid someone will throw you under the bus. I find it hard to believe that some of you would actually bow down and except the official explanation for Kennedy? Oswald? Yeah right…… Lets hear it if you have the balls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JosephH Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 did you check out the last link.? or u just tired. or offended? are you jewish maybe? jumping to conclusions i dont dream about? evil allies itself with evil. light seeks light. Your link says this: 1914-crrent: A consortium of 12 privately held banks called the Federal Reserve Bank. The largest share holder of the bank are the Rothschild's of London. That second sentence is entirely fabricated, as in not true or, as we commonly say, false. Did you just not bother to fact check that assertion? And is jewishness "evil" or "light"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JosephH Posted June 20, 2011 Share Posted June 20, 2011 Lets hear it if you have the balls. Ok, are your kids up to date on all their vaccines? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted June 20, 2011 Author Share Posted June 20, 2011 http://www.libertyforlife.com/banking/federal_reserve_bank.html in case you missed it..is this one factual/? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted June 20, 2011 Author Share Posted June 20, 2011 (edited) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Bank_of_New_York wiki is ok source but will suffice .you will see in the paragraph 'largest bank' that it is a private bank!! one of 12.. Edited June 20, 2011 by joblo7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted June 20, 2011 Author Share Posted June 20, 2011 did you check out the last link.? or u just tired. or offended? are you jewish maybe? jumping to conclusions i dont dream about? evil allies itself with evil. light seeks light. Your link says this: 1914-crrent: A consortium of 12 privately held banks called the Federal Reserve Bank. The largest share holder of the bank are the Rothschild's of London. That second sentence is entirely fabricated, as in not true or, as we commonly say, false. Did you just not bother to fact check that assertion? And is jewishness "evil" or "light"? you thick!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joblo7 Posted June 20, 2011 Author Share Posted June 20, 2011 OWNERSHIP OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE Most Americans, if they know anything at all about the Federal Reserve, believe it is an agency of the United States Government. This article charts the true nature of the "National Bank." Chart 1 Source: ** Federal Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence ** - - Published 1976 Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York. The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn, Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914. These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control. "' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.