layton Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26/liberals.atheists.sex.intelligence/index.html?hpt=P1 Quote
ivan Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 undoubtedly why :nurd:s only screw hawt chix! Quote
ivan Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 undoubtedly the researchers done saw idiocracy: "More intelligent people don't have more children, so moving away from the trajectory is not going to happen," he said. Quote
Choada_Boy Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 It takes anyone with half a brain about thirty seconds to realize any religion is a joke. Quote
G-spotter Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 undoubtedly the researchers done saw idiocracy: "More intelligent people don't have more children, so moving away from the trajectory is not going to happen," he said. The question is not whether they have more children but whether those children survive long enough to themselves reproduce. if you drunkenly spawn a giant litter of pups and leave'em in the van while you gamble on the rez and they all bake to death, it's the hand of god removing your seed from the gene pool, man! Quote
ivan Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 undoubtedly the researchers done saw idiocracy: "More intelligent people don't have more children, so moving away from the trajectory is not going to happen," he said. The question is not whether they have more children but whether those children survive long enough to themselves reproduce. if you drunkenly spawn a giant litter of pups and leave'em in the van while you gamble on the rez and they all bake to death, it's the hand of god removing your seed from the gene pool, man! throwing product at the problem solves all problems the allies in ww1 mayflies drugzzzz! Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 (edited) It's common knowledge that conservatives who are not confined to celibacy by the kind of sexual dysfunction so common in that neck of the gene pool will fuck anything that moves and many things that don't; any great, fat pie wagon or 15 year old boy will apparently do. As long as the situation is highly fucked up; restraining orders, child molestation, full employment for crack whores; conservatives are pulling their plentiful weight. Don't expect atheists to 'out pro-create' this mangy excess population, however. We all know they eat their young. Edited February 27, 2010 by tvashtarkatena Quote
ivan Posted February 27, 2010 Posted February 27, 2010 Chiropractology = religion. dude, didn't i tell you - you suck at funny! seems to me chiro = a decent living, which no man can begrudge Quote
Fairweather Posted February 28, 2010 Posted February 28, 2010 Funny? This kind of shit is more discredited than George Bernard Shaw and Garrett Hardin. The wrong 'type' of people are out breeding us! Gimme a break. Quote
prole Posted February 28, 2010 Posted February 28, 2010 Your new "diet pills" aren't doing much for the coherence of your argument. Okay, slow down, breathe into a bag, and turn off the TV. Now, use your words... Quote
G-spotter Posted February 28, 2010 Posted February 28, 2010 Evolutionary people suggests dumb people HAVE to have more kids than smart people. hold my beer and watch this! That's why it's called the Darwin Award. Quote
pink Posted February 28, 2010 Posted February 28, 2010 Chiropractology = religion. dude, didn't i tell you - you suck at funny! seems to me chiro = a decent living, which no man can begrudge you suck at climbing but who has more trip reports than anyone? Quote
Stonehead Posted February 28, 2010 Posted February 28, 2010 You actually have a more astute understanding about the meaning of that article than anyone else. The content of that article has less to do with evolutionary theory as much as it does with Social Darwinism--two different things. “It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind... Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in Buck v. Bell Quote
ivan Posted February 28, 2010 Posted February 28, 2010 you suck at climbing but who has more trip reports than anyone? dood, dru would have been in the lead fir that 2 if only he logged trips on yer momma! Quote
ivan Posted February 28, 2010 Posted February 28, 2010 The content of that article has less to do with evolutionary theory as much as it does with Social Darwinism--two different things. and the reason why FW was the ONLY one who seemed to think it seriously worth thinking about Quote
pink Posted February 28, 2010 Posted February 28, 2010 you suck at climbing but who has more trip reports than anyone? dood, dru would have been in the lead fir that 2 if only he logged trips on yer momma! turns out that you suck at funny too Quote
ivan Posted February 28, 2010 Posted February 28, 2010 you suck at climbing but who has more trip reports than anyone? dood, dru would have been in the lead fir that 2 if only he logged trips on yer momma! turns out that you suck at funny too Quote
pink Posted February 28, 2010 Posted February 28, 2010 you should take a pomeranian climbing with you... might give yor TR that special zing. Quote
ivan Posted February 28, 2010 Posted February 28, 2010 you should take a pomeranian climbing with you... might give yor TR that special zing. naw, dude, i gotta take you! didn't we talk about j'berg once? if only we could bring jim! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.