prole Posted September 21, 2009 Posted September 21, 2009 Liberals are not only racists pigs, but bloodthirsty savages wishing death on their opponents. Â If there was a Wiki entry for "American Terrorism", you'd not find an entry coming from the Left for nearly thirty years. On the other hand, there's no shortage of anti-abortion shooters, militia-nuts, gay-bashers, Federal Building and Olympics parade bombers, and other assorted wackos. All from the Right. How does historical reality jive with your statement above? Or is your criticism based on the fact that liberals don't act on their "wishes"? Quote
Fairweather Posted September 21, 2009 Posted September 21, 2009 Liberals are not only racists pigs, but bloodthirsty savages wishing death on their opponents. Â If there was a Wiki entry for "American Terrorism", you'd not find an entry coming from the Left for nearly thirty years. On the other hand, there's no shortage of anti-abortion shooters, militia-nuts, gay-bashers, Federal Building and Olympics parade bombers, and other assorted wackos. All from the Right. How does historical reality jive with your statement above? Or is your criticism based on the fact that liberals don't act on their "wishes"? Â Â You are the dumbest fuck on this site. Â Â ...and lets not forget your Earthfirst! friends too. Quote
olyclimber Posted September 21, 2009 Posted September 21, 2009 anarcho-primitivist...not a liberal or even close. closer to being libertarian if anything. Quote
prole Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 anarcho-primitivist...not a liberal or even close. closer to being libertarian if anything. Â I'll buy that. Quote
Fairweather Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 anarcho-primitivist...not a liberal or even close. closer to being libertarian if anything.  Yea right. His manifesto reads like Prole's, j_b's, and TTK's posts right here on your site.  http://cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt  "INTRODUCTION    1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in "advanced" countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in "advanced" countries.  2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.  3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.  4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence: it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We can't predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society. ". . . Quote
olyclimber Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 describing his writings as "liberal" is pretty funny. you should look up the word in the dictionary! Quote
prole Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society. Â Not liberal. Not Marxist. At any rate, at least our real fringe extremists had some fuckin' style. Â [video:youtube] Quote
olyclimber Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 ok you got me. in that there will be "liberal" as in "many" changes with his proposed system! Quote
Fairweather Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 Insomuch as posters here embrace the label it likewise applies to TK. As for dictionary work; might I suggest you look up "Tax" and pass your findings along. Quote
Pete_H Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 This is like the whacko nutjob draft. We'll take David Koresh, you take Kaszinski. Quote
olyclimber Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 wow you're going to ride that one off into the sunset aren't you. a politician doing double speak??? BREAKING NEWS!!! Quote
olyclimber Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 This is like the whacko nutjob draft. We'll take David Koresh, you take Kaszinski. Â you mean a WHACK-OFF?????? Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 As for dictionary work; might I suggest you look up "Tax" and pass your findings along. Â "the fact that you have to look it up in the dictionary..." LOLZ Â Obama sure sucks w/o a teleprompter Quote
olyclimber Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 oh! oh! oh! are you complaining about a politicians speaking ability? Â Â [video:youtube]lzWdJ_Px5qY Â Â Quote
Fairweather Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 This is like the whacko nutjob draft. We'll take David Koresh, you take Kaszinski. Â you mean a WHACK-OFF?????? Â OK. Alright. Yes. It was me... Â Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 oh! oh! oh! are you complaining about a politicians speaking ability?   the fact that you had to look this up in youtube... Quote
olyclimber Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 the problem i had was choosing just one of the videos Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 So let's see what we've learned here: Â a) Liberals are bloodthirsty savages. b) I'm the Unabomber. FW likes to whack off onto a doug fir whenever he thinks about a) or b) Â Carry on. Â Quote
Choada_Boy Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 We need a bounty on Limbaugh's head. Â Â Classic libtard thought. This post alone illuminates the true depth of your ignorance. You gonna be at the rope up by any chance? Â Liberals are not only racists pigs, but bloodthirsty savages wishing death on their opponents. Â Limbaugh is not my "opponent": He and his ilk are vermin worthy of extinction, and I mean that literally. Consider it a preemptive strike in the coming ignorance and stupidity fueled civil war. It would be like shooting Hitler in 1935. And I'm so left of liberal I like black people. Quote
prole Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 Actually we're still waiting for a single example of a bloodthirsty liberal that's actually acted on their impulses during the last thirty years. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 This kind of 'bloodthirsty liberal' rhetoric is straight out of the Nazi playbook regarding those evil Jews. It's tried and true shit that really gets the crackers stirred up for a good lynchin'. Â Only there aren't no more lynchins to blow the stem off at anymores, Crackers. So git yer limp dicks down to the next town hall meeting to squeel with the rest of the castrada while the rest of us move the fuck on with real life in the real world. Â Cue FW's TTK-as-anti-semite comment. Shit, he should have a control character on his keyboard for that by now. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 This kind of 'bloodthirsty liberal' rhetoric is straight out of the Nazi playbook regarding those evil Jews. It's tried and true shit that really gets the crackers stirred up for a good lynchin'. Â Only there aren't no more lynchins to blow the stem off at anymores, Crackers. So git yer limp dicks down to the next town hall meeting to squeel with the rest of the castrada while the rest of us move the fuck on with real life in the real world. Â Cue FW's TTK-as-anti-semite comment. Shit, he should have a control character on his keyboard for that by now. Â Let's hear your Clarence Thomas imitation again, TTK... for "illustrative purposes" of course. Â And what was that you posted on this forum about W... and a "bullet in his head"... Quote
Fairweather Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 We need a bounty on Limbaugh's head. Â Â Â He and his ilk are vermin worthy of extinction, and I mean that literally. Consider it a preemptive strike in the coming ignorance and stupidity fueled civil war. Â Bring it on little man. Youza real tuff guy! Â Quote
prole Posted September 22, 2009 Posted September 22, 2009 Only there aren't no more lynchins to blow the stem off at anymores, Crackers. Â Ahem. Â 3 Whites Indicted in Dragging Death of Black Man in Texas July 6, 1998 Web posted at: 11:07 p.m. EDT (0307 GMT) Â JASPER, Texas (CNN) -- Three white men were indicted Monday on capital murder charges in the death of a black man who was chained to a pickup truck and dragged to his death on a rural East Texas road in early June. Â One indictment issued by a Jasper County grand jury accuses John William King, 23, of Jasper and Lawrence Russell Brewer, 31, of Sulphur Springs of capital murder. A second indictment by the grand jury names Shawn Allen Berry, 23, of Jasper. Â King and Brewer are expected to be tried together, but officials said that Berry's charge may be reduced in a plea agreement. Berry has been a key witness in the investigation. Â If convicted, the men could face the death penalty in the June 7 slaying of James Byrd Jr. Â The suspects are being held without bond in what authorities call a racially motivated crime. All three suspects have prison records, and authorities have said that at least two have the tattoos of white racist prison gangs. Racist literature also was seized from their homes. Â Jasper District Attorney Guy James Gray said the trial for King and Brewer could take place this fall, but it is more likely to begin during the first months of 1999. Â Beaumont lawyer Joseph C. "Lum" Hawthorn notified the court Monday that he has been retained to defend Berry. Hawthorn said he expected Berry to plead innocent. Â Investigators believe that Byrd, 49, accepted a ride from the suspects as he walked home from a niece's bridal shower. But police believe that instead of taking him home, the men drove Byrd to a wooded area, beat him, chained him behind Berry's truck and sped down a bumpy road just east of town. Â Byrd's severed head, neck and right arm were discovered about a mile from where his shredded torso was dumped. A trail of blood, body parts and personal effects stretched for two miles, police said. Â According to one court affidavit, Berry told authorities that Brewer sprayed Byrd's face with black paint before he was killed. Â In addition to any state charges, federal authorities are considering federal hate crime charges against the trio, which also could make them eligible for the death penalty.--from CNN Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.