Josh Lewis Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 Should'nt the Mountain Loop highway have its own section on this site? Or is the North Cascades combined with the Mountain Loop Highway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weekend_Climberz Posted February 12, 2008 Share Posted February 12, 2008 3.....2.....1..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Things are kinda divided up along the geography chosen by FB for the Cascade Alpine Guides. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 Can't we email him and ask him to reorganize his books? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marylou Posted February 13, 2008 Share Posted February 13, 2008 WHAT? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Lewis Posted February 13, 2008 Author Share Posted February 13, 2008 Never mind, it was just a suggestion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlpineK Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 Never mind, it was just a stupid suggestion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted February 18, 2008 Share Posted February 18, 2008 Should'nt the Mountain Loop highway have its own section on this site? Or is the North Cascades combined with the Mountain Loop Highway? Not a bad thought. The Glacier Peak Region is distinctly different from the "North Cascades"--at least as much as Alpine Lakes area is distinct from the "South Cascades". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genepires Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 This is not a stupid question. If there were more trip reports to the mtn loop hwy, then it would be reasonable. Trips out there have a different character. Most trip reports out there are darrington and therefore in the rock section. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NateF Posted February 20, 2008 Share Posted February 20, 2008 The question seems understandable. It's a stretch to lump Big Four, Whitehorse, 3 Fingers, Vesper et al as being in the north cascades (if that's where they are meant to be categorized here). Unless you've spent enough time perusing this site, in which case you just know that's where they go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlpineK Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Just take a look at the BC forum. With logic like dividing up the Mountain Loop separate from the rest of the North Cascades the BC forum should be separated into well over 100 forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shapp Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Yes it should and it should be called Hanman's Chloroform Playhouse! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
curtveld Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 the BC forum should be separated into well over 100 forums. Yeah, except that 86 of them would have no posts. The North Cascades could easily be split into two or three forums. NE Cascades/WA Pass could support its own as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hanman Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 "Yes it should and it should be called Hanman's Chloroform Playhouse! " Ok by me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.