KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Shhh....we're going to scare the last conservative off the board dammit. Then we'll be stuck arguing about windshirts all day instead of politics. If you're talking about me, don't worry, I've got a thicker skin that that. As for being conservative - don't mistake that for being a pro-Bush, true-believer. I may not be willing to support a guy like Kerry, but I still have problems with Bush, and our political leaders in general. I can sum it up with one thought: in a nation with almost 300 million people, the most able, talented, hard-working, intelligent candidates that we could come up with were Dubya and Kerry? And the last time around - Dubya and Gore? Pathetic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cj001f Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Because this budget is a move in the right direction. Bush has overseen exorbitant spending increases. It's high time to tighten our belts. I'd like to see the cuts continue, and for the programs we have to become more efficient. Transfer payments and the social safety net needs to be given to only those who truly need it, not those who just want to suck on the teat of the nanny state. I could even support such a safety net at the federal level, but the problem is that it is extremely difficult to objectively determine "need" through a large, federal bureaucracies (which are in no way "compassionate", BTW - it's a myth to think that they are). It is better for this to be done at the state and local level, and even better through private charities. The overhead of these bureacracies is ridiculous, on top of the fact that there is little oversight w/r/t who is actually helped by them. Moreover, they benefit by keeping people ON the programs - if they don't, they've worked themselves out of a job. At least with a charity, they have to keep their books in order, and if you lose faith with one because of a scandal (i.e. American Red Cross and the 9/11 fund), you can cut off donations and go elsewhere. Keep drinking the Koolaid KK. 1% cut in the discretionary programs matched with a much larger increase in the even more wasteful (and I'm talking merely about beauracratic inefficiency) defense spending doesn't equal a positive change, it's a turn in the "right" direction. As for education - an educated populace is the only thing we currently have in our favor to fight off China and India. We're now flushing that down the toilet - cuts in loans, cuts in Science funding. Way to go W! Please take your diversionary jealousy about Financial Aid elsewhere KK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Posted February 8, 2005 Author Share Posted February 8, 2005 I can sum it up with one thought: in a nation with almost 300 million people, the most able, talented, hard-working, intelligent candidates that we could come up with were Dubya and Kerry? And the last time around - Dubya and Gore? Pathetic. Agreed on one point anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EWolfe Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 One man had a great solution: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Shhh....we're going to scare the last conservative off the board dammit. Then we'll be stuck arguing about windshirts all day instead of politics. If you're talking about me, don't worry, I've got a thicker skin that that. As for being conservative - don't mistake that for being a pro-Bush, true-believer. I may not be willing to support a guy like Kerry, but I still have problems with Bush, and our political leaders in general. I can sum it up with one thought: in a nation with almost 300 million people, the most able, talented, hard-working, intelligent candidates that we could come up with were Dubya and Kerry? And the last time around - Dubya and Gore? Pathetic. We have some common ground here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpinfox Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 It should have been McCain vs. Dean, but Karl Rove is a Nazi bitch and the Dems are a bunch of spineless ass kissers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squid Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 W00T! Amen! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunglehead Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 It should have been McCain vs. Dean, but Karl Rove is a Nazi bitch and the Dems are a bunch of spineless ass kissers. No shit. I agree 100% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 1% cut in the discretionary programs matched with a much larger increase in the even more wasteful (and I'm talking merely about beauracratic inefficiency) defense spending doesn't equal a positive change, it's a turn in the "right" direction. The overall increase in this budget is smaller than any of the previous 4. If we continue to make cuts, inefficiencies will have to be addressed at some point. Making the cuts puts pressure to do so. Tax and spend statists just want to spend more and ignore any inefficiencies entirely. The solution is always "throw more money at the problem". As for education - an educated populace is the only thing we currently have in our favor to fight off China and India. We're now flushing that down the toilet - cuts in loans, cuts in Science funding. Way to go W! Please take your diversionary jealousy about Financial Aid elsewhere KK. I work in high-tech, and have advanced degrees in engineering. My experience was (and still is) that American students on balance are more interested in being in a cushy major and partying than in studying hard in a "difficult" subject matter compared with foreign students - notably those from Asia. This trend continues today, when immigrants or foreign nationals are increasingly needed to fill tech jobs. It has nothing to do with funding - opportunities are available at our schools as it is. American students simply refuse to take advantage of the opportunities. Foreign students, who have undergone hardship in their nation of origin, are simply willing to work harder. Give away government programs do NOT encourage the latter; they continue to breed a mentality of entitlement to hand outs and an "easy" life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 It should have been McCain vs. Dean, but Karl Rove is a Nazi bitch and the Dems are a bunch of spineless ass kissers. It should have been McCain vs. Clinton in '96 (McCain was the best of the half dozen or so republicans in the primary), but the good-ole-boy network gave it to Dole who had "paid his dues". McCain got screwed 3 times, IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 But that's the point!!! The budget is not getting smaller - it's getting larger. And rather than tax according to what you're spending he's borrowing huge amounts. Firstly, the budget can get larger without increasing the deficit when you factor in population growth, a better economy/higher GNP/efficiency improvements, and inflation. As to your "solution" - I say cut spending, not taxes. We can not sustain the deficit - good, that puts pressure to do something. That *something* should be to cut spending NOT raise taxes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squid Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 It should have been McCain vs. Clinton in '96 (McCain was the best of the half dozen or so republicans in the primary), but the good-ole-boy network gave it to Dole who had "paid his dues". McCain got screwed 3 times, IMO. Ok, so we agree on two things. Now lets get back to our regularly scheduled programming where I call you names and insult you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 The willingness to throw away other people's hard-earned money is underated. Republicans cut taxes and increase spending less. Dems raise taxes and increase spending more. We need a party to cut taxes and cut spending. Actually, taxes are fine where they are now, IMO, so we just need to hold them steady and cut spending. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpinfox Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 cut spending NOT raise taxes. But where will emperor Georgie get the money to invade Iran, Syria, Jordan, N.Korea, and Canada? so we just need to hold [taxes] steady and cut spending. I partly agree. We should start by cutting spending for the Department of Offense... err... DEFENSE, and homeland security. We should increase spending on research and development of things that will allow our society to continue functioning in the future and decrease our dependence on foreign oil/food imports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Ok, so we agree on two things. Now lets get back to our regularly scheduled programming where I call you names and insult you. Actually, I was waiting for RuMR to jump in here and accuse me of being a butt pirate, and throwing out some other insults. Anyway, who cares about all this politics shit. I'm really pissed off because of the shitty winter - it's got me in a bad mood. Fucking El Nino. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmace Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 My experience was (and still is) that American students on balance are more interested in being in a cushy major and partying than in studying hard in a "difficult" subject matter compared with foreign students - notably those from Asia. This trend continues today, when immigrants or foreign nationals are increasingly needed to fill tech jobs. So amazing, I really wonder why that is, I was most often the only North American born kid in many of my math and physics classes I think its because our public schools at least here in Canada SUCK huge ass and the material we cover in grade 12 most Asian and European schools cover in grade 9 but that has nothing to do with the defecit so I will just shut up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cj001f Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 So amazing, I really wonder why that is, I was most often the only North American born kid in many of my math and physics classes I think its because our public schools at least here in Canada SUCK huge ass and the material we cover in grade 12 most Asian and European schools cover in grade 9 but that has nothing to do with the defecit so I will just shut up now Hmm. I thought it was because American born students are smart enough to realize the financial rewards for managers, marketers, and salesman (which require much less education) are far greater than the rewards for people with technical expertise. One engineers $.02 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Anyway, who cares about all this politics shit. I'm really pissed off because of the shitty winter - it's got me in a bad mood. Fucking El Nino. Brought to you by global warming, which won't be getting any better due to the policies of the current administration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 Brought to you by global warming, which won't be getting any better due to the policies of the current administration. I am not convinced that this is the case as opposed to natural fluctuations in world temperatures. However, if it IS the case, I don't think we can do anything about it other than SLOW it's progress (i.e. not halt it and not reverse it). If this is the case, we are fucked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bogen Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 I think it was senator Eugene McCarthy that said: "Being a politician is like being a football coach. You have to be smart enough to play the game, and dumb enough to think it's important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted February 8, 2005 Share Posted February 8, 2005 I also believe that Eugene McCarthy said "Give me a windshirt and a packet of GU, and I'll climb any 8000m peak". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Posted February 8, 2005 Author Share Posted February 8, 2005 Politics is Hollywood for ugly people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 Politics is Hollywood for ugly people. What about Arnie? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionel_Hutz Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 My experience was (and still is) that American students on balance are more interested in being in a cushy major and partying than in studying hard in a "difficult" subject matter compared with foreign students - notably those from Asia. This trend continues today, when immigrants or foreign nationals are increasingly needed to fill tech jobs. It has nothing to do with funding - opportunities are available at our schools as it is. American students simply refuse to take advantage of the opportunities. Foreign students, who have undergone hardship in their nation of origin, are simply willing to work harder. Give away government programs do NOT encourage the latter; they continue to breed a mentality of entitlement to hand outs and an "easy" life. KK, sounds like you're describing GW . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted February 9, 2005 Share Posted February 9, 2005 My experience was (and still is) that American students on balance are more interested in being in a cushy major and partying than in studying hard in a "difficult" subject matter compared with foreign students - notably those from Asia. This trend continues today, when immigrants or foreign nationals are increasingly needed to fill tech jobs. It has nothing to do with funding - opportunities are available at our schools as it is. American students simply refuse to take advantage of the opportunities. Foreign students, who have undergone hardship in their nation of origin, are simply willing to work harder. Give away government programs do NOT encourage the latter; they continue to breed a mentality of entitlement to hand outs and an "easy" life. KK, sounds like you're describing GW . . . Or Kerry or Gore. They all have comparable GPAs from college. Bush's was higher than Kerry's, BTW. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.