Winter

who's throwin' the air hockey after-party?

the fucking 80s rocked! almost as much as peter gabriel.

the stupid one is the fool who can't read through the sarcasm w/o it being spelt out for them. I'm glad to see our (future) lawyers have such a finely tuned ability to read between the lines. maybe some emoticons will help. mmmmmm spelt.

what the hell does climbing have to do with anything?

and she's really stupid, so you might even stand a chance with her!

unbelieveable - way to make a bad situation worse.

getting shot at, unprotectable choss, big whippers - you guys make this sounds like a fun day out.

I'm confused. You say "I'm with Winter on this one" - but Winter 's sarcasm indicates he is stridently against corporal punishment in schools. Or maybe I'm just missing your own too-subtle sarcasm? what sarcasm? i volunteer in my local grade school every week to inflict a good beating on those little insubordinate brats. it does em some good, and it makes me feel really good about myself. plus than i can deduct the money i spend on belts and shoes.

Speaking of moralizing hypocrites, here is a photo of the John Edwards compound. You may know him as a Democrat champion of the poor and the environment: Apparently his wife doesn't get along with the "neighbors". Nice folks. clearly edwards is trying to improve habitat for deer and elk while creating defensible spaces around homes and communities to reduce the risk of a catastrophic forest fire. duh.

the lewd conduct involved craig peeking through the crack in the stall door and touching the cops foot in the next stall over - its isn't about a proposition.

photoshopped

maybe i could just plead to a misdemeanor and then change my mind once it gets out into the public.

from Craig's web site: What is the dress code in Senator Craig's office? Male staff members should wear a tie at all times, and a suit jacket or sport coat should be kept handy. Hmmmm ....

haha! sucka. learn to read bitch. "IF Craig is a child molester." who said he was?

By whether he is convicted of a crime by a jury. I seriously hope you are not a lawyer. so if you admit to your crime, plead guilty and then avoid a trial by a jury, society should still assume that you are innocent? that makes a lot of sense.

lawyers are barely one notch above child molesters unless they are also politicians, then they fall two notches down. so if craig is a politician and child molester how does that rank with your standard ambulance chaser? i'm getting confused here.

hey dumb ass - he plead guilty - that means he's guilty. 1) he reversed his plea 2) many people plead guilty who aren't - for various reasons 1) you're making shit up. he hasn't withdrawan and won't be allowed to unless the judge let's him. 2) so how do we conclude that he is in fact guilty if we can't rely on his own admission?

no you have it all backwords my good man. attorneys solve problems, promote the social good, and protect individual rights. maybe a couple extra beatings back in the day would have helped you get this all straight in that warped head of yours.

hey dumb ass - he plead guilty - that means he's guilty.

so you mean like mike vick getting elected to congress on an anti-dog fighting platform?

ah man, i remember the good ol days when we got beat in school by grizzled old career teachers that had been beatin kids for decades. if we could only take the ruler and belt to the delinquint kids these days, i'm sure we could fix our education system and crank out more happy, healthy, well-adusted youth ready to go out into the world and do good. *warmfuzzy*

I'd actually be in favor of full legalization of all drugs, extending the legal benefits of marriage to any two consenting adults, etc - but this isn't about my policy preferences. I've just been arguing that there may be people who may feel that their lifestyle choices may not be an ideal template upon which to base the construction of public policy. So long as they're candid about their own behavior, I don't think that charges of hypocrisy are warranted. Different standards apply to different behaviors - especially those involving consensual behavior between two mentally competent adults, or behaviors which don't harm anyone else directly - but I think there are cases in which one can engage in behaviors and still conclude that they should be condemned, illegal, etc. I don't think that Patrick Kennedy, for example, is under any ethical obligation to argue that driving while gorked out on prescription meds should be decriminalized because he was caught doing so. T craig hasn't exactly been candid about his behavior (unless you're in a bathroom with him) or admitted to anything (apart from his guilty plea) and apparently continues to lie about his own sexuality. if he comes clean, admits that he's gay, that he wanted to get laid in the men's bathroom, that he got laid in the DC airport bathroom, and that his own actions directly conflict with his policy position, then let's talk again. at that point, it will up to his constituency to determine whether he can effectively represent them in DC.

McClane's description should get you down. But you could also get wicked lost. Good luck!

how is being gay=gambling addiction?

well at least we know he can hear and speak. thinking and problem solving are different skills altogether.