Nitrox

Don't worry, Obamacare will make them healthy.

Your Prostate.

As a teacher, how you do feel about the mass use of sick days to shut the school system down and encouragement by the teachers for students to join in protesting (in lieu of attending school)?

If you've taught us anything its to be picky. I looked at buying the Black Spider Hoody but don't like the huge zipper. I keep waiting for design revisions (on the pants too) so I can get on board but then other manufacturers come out with products that more closely fit my needs.

Unpasturized milk CoOp have been around since the 70's.

Veganism is largely an unhealthy lifestyle.

100% Highspeed Trains

I did my FIL's older Cyborgs in flat black KG. EEzox smells awful.

Interesting topic but I'm left wondering if Language will get you banned or if Language posted by me will get me banned. Its not as if offensive language, insults, and personal attacks aren't posted here often. Obviously my post was vulgar but not extraordinary judging by some of the posts in Spray. Its strange that "flapping cunt" is over the line but not "Alright, You Faggots", "can't help that Nitrox craves big black dick.", or "JewPR". If I didn't know better I'd swear that you have a personal problem with me and are making it public instead of addressing the issue privately (Which I think would have netted a more positive result). I can accept that what I said was a ban'able offense but does that mean moving forward the rules will be applied evenly regardless of the side you're on? Maybe Admins would like to weigh in on the topic, is the 'swamp getting drained' or have we found a petty new low? quit yer flapping, cunt Nitrox's persecution...Egypt...it's all so moving. I don't think I'm being persecuted, I did post vulgarities and the rules are what they are. What I'm asking is will the rules be enforced consistently or is this thread just a hypocritical temper tantrum?

The point here is the hypocrisy of bannination for using a "misogynistic" term when other equally offensive insults and personal attacks are hurled regularly with no punishment. And if you read the rules of Spray post, pretty much everyone in spray is eligible for banning, including you. He's defending the decision because he was the one feverishly pressing the Report button and lobbying for my ban as he described above.

Interesting topic but I'm left wondering if Language will get you banned or if Language posted by me will get me banned. Its not as if offensive language, insults, and personal attacks aren't posted here often. Obviously my post was vulgar but not extraordinary judging by some of the posts in Spray. Its strange that "flapping cunt" is over the line but not "Alright, You Faggots", "can't help that Nitrox craves big black dick.", or "JewPR". If I didn't know better I'd swear that you have a personal problem with me and are making it public instead of addressing the issue privately (Which I think would have netted a more positive result). I can accept that what I said was a ban'able offense but does that mean moving forward the rules will be applied evenly regardless of the side you're on? Maybe Admins would like to weigh in on the topic, is the 'swamp getting drained' or have we found a petty new low?

Well don't just sit there and cry, Sally.

"Flapping Cunt" fits too. I rest my case. No you don't, you'll be back whining with the same drivel as you always do. You're a predictable one trick pony (whining ass bitch).

Cause you're a closeted neocon atilla jackbooted regressive thug?

USE OF OFFENSIVE MISOGYNIST TERMS ARE GROUNDS FOR BANNING AT CC.COM, A STANDARD SET BY THE OWNERS OF THIS BOARD AND SUPPORTED BY THE MODERATORS. READ YOUR USER AGREEMENT IF YOU HAVE ANY DOUBTS. NITROX IS BANNED FOR 24 HOURS, NEXT TIME HE'S GONE FOR GOOD OTHERS INCLINED TO BANDY ABOUT THE TERM "CUNT" SHOULD TAKE NOTICE: YOU'RE NEXT off white spray mod

What if hypothetically the new space port would rapidly pay for itself?

Yep, whiny bitch.

And you sound like a whiny bitch, I guess that makes us even.

I can't speak for anyone else but I haven't argued that the government hasn't or shouldn't pay for infrastructure just that we should be able to actually pay for it. Somewhere along the way that didn't jive with your make-believe plan so now you're just talking louder.

You seam to check facts but not actually read them. But, I think that's just you, not all liberals.

yah, public subsidies of rail networks have been retarded. Look how well the Western US developed without them. lulz. Now back to plowing billions into roads with a negative ROI! The difference being that rail use in the infancy of this country was a private endeavor. I don't think there are any cost neutral commuter train systems in the US, Amtrac being another example. Again, I'm not necessarily opposed to spending the money but I'm not willing to do so under the pretense that we're going make/save money and certainly not if we just have to borrow more from the Chinese. One isn't entitled to one's own facts: Oops - history of the pacific railroad "the bill authorizing the construction of the Pacific Railroad which was adopted by Congress in 1862" Between land grants, lax labor and immigration policies, and helpfully clearing indians out of the way, the Pacific Railroad was almost completely paid for by public money. It took all of two minutes to send that Nitrox gem down the shitter. Next.... As with most historically and analytically challenged tea party parrots, Nitrox seems stumped by even the simplest 'real' question. Yep, a bill authorizing the Pacific Railroad. The Union Pacific Railroad Co. was still a privately held company and a private endeavor. The bill granted land and subsidies, it didn't provide that the government owned the railroad or paid for its operations and maintenance. The Union Pacific Railroad was also used for *gasp* commerce and generated income. When it became obsolete it was removed or reset, not propped up by the government and turned into a massive sucking black hole of spending (AMTRAC). Also, the Pacific Railroad was within our means, we didn't need to borrow money from China.

yah, public subsidies of rail networks have been retarded. Look how well the Western US developed without them. lulz. Now back to plowing billions into roads with a negative ROI! The difference being that rail use in the infancy of this country was a private endeavor. I don't think there are any cost neutral commuter train systems in the US, Amtrac being another example. Again, I'm not necessarily opposed to spending the money but I'm not willing to do so under the pretense that we're going make/save money and certainly not if we just have to borrow more from the Chinese.

Hypothetically if I could turn water into wine would you wash my feet?

Name one government program with guaranteed rapid pay back that actually rapidly paid back? The Portland metro train is a shining example of a guaranteed cost savings turning into a black hole of spending.