Wrong again, the teachers in that video are discussing their union and profession specifically and using racial epithets in the context of how much they are fleecing the public while doing said job.
That was in New Jersey. In the case of Wisconsin, the employees just aren't worth the money. Not that I care, since the tax payer is footing the bill I'm fine with the state not getting it up the ass from a union that's only purpose is to extract as much money as possible.
As if a cursory article on Huffingtonpost refutes teachers getting caught drunkenly throwing around racial epithets at a union meeting. Face it, you're getting punked on this issue.
Rob, state laws veri but in most states you can privately own cannons, rifled artillery, explosives, machineguns, tanks (with live cannons), etc. I'm not familiar with FAA regs so you may be right about the jets (and nukes).
Spot on, the NPR and Planned Parenthood cuts are a finger-in-the-eye gesture, they don't achieve a true budgetary fix. But, what does anyone expect, all I see out of both sides is an 'Us vs. Them' mentality. Neither side is really working to find a common ground or solution.
What kind of guns are acceptable tools? Are nuclear weapons acceptable tools? Tanks and heavy machine guns? "Assault rifles?" High-capacity magazines? What is acceptable for personal defense, and what should be prohibited to protect the masses? Where do YOU draw the line?
Rob, would you please tell me in your own words what you consider to be a "High-Capacity" magazine and "Assault Rifle"?
Not trying to be a dick, its clear who lines up on which side of the debate and I see these terms thrown around a lot but I often wonder if their meaning is ever really considered.
Given the physical nature of this site I don't expect you're going too find many over weight people here.
you go outside?
I've been known to post Spray from the crag.