tvashtarkatena

All that corn and no skis?

I've got a new, tangly rope I've been wanting to dangle off of the Aurora bridge, but The Man's keeping me down.

Heart failure; the Lord's metaphor.

At Darrington, no one can hear you scream.

Didn't save the link (wrong boot). Google the boot name you're looking for + "sale" and you'll find it. Pretty much how I shop for everthing. I've been climbing in old school all leather (inside and out) Makalus; they climb wonderfully but they are just too cold for some trips. I'm looking for Ice Evos or something like that.

I'm guessing this phenomenon is where the phrase "You don't have a snowball's chance in Hell" comes from.

So that's why I augered so hard at the bottom of that jump. Or maybe I'm just a suck ass skier.

Khumbus for $227 You can also get Nepals for just over $300 on the web. I'm also shopping for (lighter) La Sportivas.

Not sure, but I gave birth to an impressive, steaming brown Dru on the Hanging Glacier.

Skied a 5000 foot run of perfect corn in bright sunshine bitches.

Trip: Shuksan - NF up, skied White Salmon down Date: 5/12/2007 Trip Report: It seems that Western Washingon finally, if temporarily, resolved its weather management issues this week. To avoid a sense of self-loathing, James (jhamaker) and I headed north to attempt the North Face of Shuksan. Our plan was to tely ski down to avoid the slogging celebrated in so many previous TRs. The route The approach went quickly; a short stroll up to the lodge, flat ski to the end of the cat track, then a traverse to the valley with three straightforward gully crossings. The valley itself is a phantasmagoria of avalanche debris; one of the largest avi fans I’ve ever seen. Crossing Avalanche Alley Hangin’ Judge’s Glacier No Hanging Around Glacier closeup Rather than carry over, we chose to camp atop a safe knoll lower down and get up earlier the following morning. At 3:30 the following morning, we were trudging our way up to the col below the North Face. Snow conditions were horrible: breakable crust, but too icy to ski (ski crampons would have been useful here). At times, James was able to rice paper over the crust while my more corn fed frame punched clean through up to the middle of my shins. Right in the middle of a snowmobiling fantasy, I heard a snap, looked down, and noticed that my 3 section ski pole had suddenly developed a 4th section. So much for carbon fiber. My sleeping bag began to beckon me like a warm, stinky siren. "Duct tape to the rescue!" James called out. He came equipped with a ski pole splint and enough duct tape to build reasonably waterproof mummy. There are definite advantages to climbing with a millwright. Things quickly turned in our favor. The North Face was in perfect, firm condition. Weather was astounding. After an initial test belay, we stowed the rope and climbed. And climbed. And climbed. It feels so good when it stops. On the North Face, Price Lake below James practices his dance moves midway up Sponsored by Value Village. Nearing the top of the North Face The telecrawling stage After a quick traverse of the upper Hanging Glacier, we stopped to splint my ski pole and power nap in the warm sunshine. James scooped a handful of the Crystal Glacier. Perfect corn. A fast downward traverse and short ascent brought us to the Sulfide Glacier and the base of the summit pyramid. From there we kicked buckets up to the summit. Dressed for success Can we ski now? One can ski from the base of the summit pyramid all the way down the mountain; a run of well over 5000 vertical feet with only one short ascending traverse to break up the fun. We tore down the Sulfide, through the Hourglass, or Hell’s Highway, or whatever it’s being called this week, and onto the Upper Curtis Glacier. From there we skinned up a rising traverse to the Pyramid and its attending ridge, then down the ridge to the notch. Man in Tights. Traversing the Upper Curtis Glacier Where’s that notch? Upper Curtis Glacier The mean side of the summit pyramid Once through the notch, we couldn’t see over the rollover, so we downclimbed. It turned out to be perfectly skiable. This sucks: a vertical mile of perfect corn. White Salmon Glacier Carving some White Salmon Miraculously, perfect corn persisted all the way down, regardless of aspect, until about 500 feet from the valley bottom. At that point, the glop took over. James kicked down a good size wet slide, which we had to wait for like a slow moving freight train before crossing the final slope. After that it was just a matter of chattering across the avi debris filled valley back to camp. Pardon my avalanche James had dinner duty, so I crawled into my bag. He apparently asked me a question, and got nothing but a snore in reply. The weather moved in that evening. By morning, it was raining. Leaving camp in the poo Our skins would not adhere the following morning. Duct tape the rescue! James seemed to have an unlimited supply of the stuff. Avi conditions on the way back had become extreme; we heard three slides kick off; and I dodged one baby slide just before the first gully crossing. Wet snow slides sound exactly like a waterfall, or someone skiing, both of which were happening at the time. Some incredibly minor change in volume must have tipped me off and caused me to look up and spot the avalanche as it came pouring down. I skied out of the way, promptly fell, bounced back up like a punching bag, and watched a few death donuts roll past. I’d say hauling skis up the North Face, while seemingly cumbersome at first, is a far better option than carrying over. Skis make the approach trivial this time of year. They never really got in our way while climbing the North Face, which was mostly 40 to 50 degree firm neve for us. Circumnavigating the mountain and traversing five of its glaciers is much easier and far more enjoyable on skis. And the downhill run (if in shape, of course) has got to be one of the longest and most scenic in North America. After a great meal at Milano’s in Glacier (highly recommended), James took over the driving while I did what I do best these days; I passed out. I awoke just as we were passing the Tulalip Casino. James turned to me. "You know, you don’t snore when you’re sitting up." Gear Notes: Ascent: lead climber had 1 Quark and 1 toy axe, 2nd had one light axe and a ski pole with an arrest grip. Crampons, one 30m rope, 2 pre-slung pickets. Not used: 1 screw, 3 small nuts, 2 long slings. Belayed one pitch at bottom. Descent: Tely skis w/ skins. Ski crampons advisable. Approach Notes: Straightforward on skis. Lower lodge, following cat track to end, traverse and cross three gullies to valley.

There is still snow on Blueberry Terrace.

It's more likely that they'd be forced to die by their own hand.

Longer than the legendary John Holmes? This sounds like a fish story to me....perhaps you should measure it again.

Eewwww! Grrrrooooos! Gag me with a chop stick! dood...she's hot...she can think whatever she wants... as can we all

Is the aluminum frame removeable from the Exposure 50? The guy at REI had no clue.

Eewwww! Grrrrooooos! Gag me with a chop stick!

If I'm in town, I'll be there.

That would be 2 unemployed bastards. No pics of our trip planner James, unfortunately; he had the camera.

Only saw it from a distance, of course, but the Granite Sidewalk is snow free and "looked" relatively dry. Again, that's from a considerable distance. The Dome itself is impressive, as always.

THAT's why your pack was so damn heavy last time....

Trip: Green Giant Buttress, Darrington - Safe Sex Date: 5/8/2007 Trip Report: On Tues, James (jhamaker) and I spent an enjoyable day climbing Safe Sex (5.9, 8 pitches) on Darrington’s Green Giant Buttress. The first six pitches run just to the right of Dreamer before intersecting with that route. Every move on this climb is wonderful, especially if you love chicken heads (excepting the uppermost pitch to the ridge top, which is pretty nondescript). Waterfall on the approach The route from the base Nearing the top of the first pitch Midway up the long third pitch Salish Peak Rapping the route Gear Notes: Gear to 3 ½. 8 quick draws, 2 rabbits, 2 long slings, 3 slings. Take a handful of extra biners for pitch 3. Larger nuts and tricams not very useful. Approach Notes: The approach involves a bit of brush and a rotting snow fan, which can be refreeze during the evening hours. Six point aluminum crampons would be a nice for this section. There is also a stream ford (we just splashed across). Walking sticks or ski poles for these two sections are recommended. The road is washed out in several places about a mile from road’s end and barely passable with an Outback.

Key Fact: The one thing those cunts in the suburbs complain about most is sitting in traffic.

The study you cited is fundamentally flawed and, I suspect, propoganda for the anti-rail folks. The most glaring and immediate flaw is the primary statistic: a decline in work ride marketshare. Think about it for two seconds and of course this is true: rails serve urban cores with populations that are stable relative to the faster growing suburbs. Most of the growth in commuters is in those suburbs. Therefore, rail ridership 'marketshare' must decline over time, even if the rail line capacity has remained maxed out at near 100% (which it has in most major cities). Rail ridership itself has not declined; only rail ridership relative commuter trips in the burbs. This is certainly not an argument against building a light rail system in denser urban cores. Western cities that have built new rail systems recently (Portland, SF) have enjoyed great success. Another factor that is not included in the study is that population (development and property values) gravitates towards light rail corridors for obvious reasons. Again, SF and Portland have both enjoyed this result. Third, your conclusions assume static, low gas prices. Nuff said there. Four, you equate buses with trains, but buses must use roads, and therefore are subject to (and part of) the very conjestion and delays that light rail riders seek to avoid. Light, simply put, is much, much faster than bus commuting. Five, you claim that light rail is more expensive than buses, but you fail to factor in such things as a $2.8 BILLION fix for a single section of road called the Viaduct and other such projects. When compared to these kinds of expensive road projects, light rail is invariably cheaper for the amount of traffic it handles, and much, much more environmentally friendly by any measure. Finally, public transportation ridership in Puget Sound is growing at a record 12% per year, a figure which is accelerating. Your study tries to make it seem like this figure is declining by using misleading statistical definitions. It is, therefore, propoganda and suspect as such. The ideal public transportation system for a city of reasonable size consists of light rail corridors that are served by and complemented with flexible buses.

Hair Pie