-
Posts
19503 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by tvashtarkatena
-
Fairly stupid post about Fred Beckey
tvashtarkatena replied to johndavidjr's topic in Climber's Board
There's a special place in Heabin for Fred Beckey, but it ain't anywhere near the Christians. -
iherb.com has a good selection of higher quality stuff and frequent sales. Shipping is cheap and favors buying in bulk. I take 'NOW' glucosamine+chondroitin+MSM and 'Dr Michael Murray' fish pills, and I'm getting smarter, stronger, and more devilishly handsome with each passing day. Pay attention to daily recommended dosage when comparing costs per day of these things.
-
Fairly stupid post about Fred Beckey
tvashtarkatena replied to johndavidjr's topic in Climber's Board
Perhaps the public just isnt' ready for "I can't hear worth a damn, but I can smell pussy a mile away". -
Do I look fat in this hole?
-
Go ahead a laugh now, but consider this: They concentrate their spraying over heavily populated cities. They spray more during colder weather, when the chemicals will sink to ground level faster. Their spray patterns form direct lines from city to city, so the chemicals will fall on the major transportation routes inbetween. We all know they control hurricanes from a base in Alaska. Are chemtrails such a giant leap?
-
After all, I did invite FW to join me for a jaunt up Tiger this morning, complete with free man boob feely priviledges. What's not to love?
-
Already ran 8 miles. You? BTW, I'm running Tiger Mt. tomorrow morning, 9:15 sharp, if you care to join me. Upper parking lot.
-
....as well as someone capable of taking climbing photos, such as this one, that you'll never be able to take yourself.
-
Self inflicted thread.
-
I can help you with your wham-bam-thankyou-mam problem, if you'll only let me, you right, white n tight pile driver, you. Go ahead, toss your tabor my way, McStudly.
-
Coming this Halloween: Evil Resurrected II
-
New football helmet
-
Wow. I never thought anyone could rip off South Park so thoroughly, strip away the humor, and get away with it.
-
I think I love you.
-
I wish to suckle her.
-
Since FW's seems to have a man crush on me, I thought I'd go with it and give him a little nipple to suck on.... Just remember to wipe off your keyboard before your toilette cleaning daughter uses it, buddy.
-
My 'prodigy'? You sure that split's that far off?
-
I hope he kept his hands off the pets, at least. And the Thanksgiving turkey, for that matter.
-
Most folks would describe it as pathological. Close family you got there. Eeeeeewwwwwww.
-
Even better. 25' deep footings might cost extra, though, as would 12' posts and bracing able to withstand a hurricane's tidal surge.
-
You KILL YOURSELF for money? I would think that would definitely be piece work.
-
When you cheat on someone, it's basically a wholly selfish act. a) you're escaping from resolving the problems in your primary relationship b) you're really disrespecting the person you're cheating on, because you don't think enough of them give them the choice as to whether to accept your cheating or walk. You're not treating them as an equal in the partnership. If it's an act of revenge, then why does the cheater stay in the primary relationship at all? And what kind of respect does that show for the (new) person the cheater is using to inflict revenge? Open relationships, where all parties are consensual, are one thing. But cheating is symptom of being unable to put another person before yourself; a condition which prohibits any long term relationship from succeeding in a satisfying way. Justifying such behavior and the damage it does to the person who is supposedly closest to you 'because a significant percentage of other people are doing it' further indicates a person who has not done the work of establishing exactly what their own values are.
-
What's 'natural' may be more of a philosophical rather than scientific discussion, but studies on long term relationships indicate that the most successful (i.e., long lasting and satisfying for both partners) relationships are built on a foundation of trust (among other things). They also indicate that having multiple partners erodes this trust, and thus the chances for the relationships longevity and satisfaction. It's certainly natural for people to be attracted to other outside their relationship, but it's also just as natural not to act on such impulses and instead choose loyalty to one's long term partner over an attractive outsider. It seems as though people in this society who have multiple, simultaneous relationships tend to also have shorter term, less satisfying relationships. We evolved as tribal creatures, so it seems natural that we would prefer these longer term, more satisfying relationships over shorter term, less stable ones. Stable, satisfying relationships with more than two people may occur, but they are rare. As for cultures that accept polygamy, they all seem to favor men over women. Saudi Arabia, hard core Mormons...I can't think of a culture that allows this practice that isn't male dominated. Perhaps the more egalitarian a culture is, the more monogamous it becomes, because this results in the greatest satisfaction of both of the sexes.
-
yes, clearly we should turn to the RealWorld and MTV for case studies on sociology and answering the most profound questions of human nature. Um, that was the joke, KKK. Looks like ya didn't get it.