kevbone

These days conspiracies are just a way of measuring individual and broad demographic IGI (Internet Gullibility Index). I would the say the gullible are the ones watching Fox, MNMBC and CNN.

Are you referring to me? Yeah...I ate too many drugs in the 70's when I was 5 years old....... thats funny.

Arent we all.....

I will never stay in camp 4 again.

Lie. God forbid you actually ask someone who was there; you know one of the soldiers tasked with security as those loons looted their own neighborhoods... Ok. smarty pants. Were you there? And if yes....did you go around a take peoples guns?

Your information? hahahah.....patty you made me actually laugh. Let me guess...you get your information from a "reliable" source right? Please inform me where so I can be awesome like you. glad to know you finally have come to grips with not being a winner.

How do you know. Your information is no better than mine.

You guys are hilarious. You probably acutally think that we killed OBL last year........hahahahahahahah. You are sheep marching to slaughter. Just like me.

Nice....love it when one guys speaks for everyone.

Agreed

Anybody have any recent news on when or if it will ever open to the public? thanks in advance.

Nice. This is not a climbing trip but just a camping trip that I am hoping to get some climbing in. I want my kids to expierence Yosemite from an early age......should be good times.

Its all good....I am ready for all the nay sayers and their sarcasm. That is what makes spray so good.

What is conspiracy other than just a scary way of saying “alternative agenda”? Skeptics are important in achieving an objective view of reality, however, skeptism is not the same as reinforcing the official storyline. In fact, a conspiracy theory can be argued as an alternative to the official or “mainstream” story of events. Therefore, when skeptics attempt to ridicule a conspiracy theory by using the official story as a means of proving the conspiracy wrong, in effect, they are just reinforcing the original “mainstream” view of history, and actually not being skeptical. This is not skeptism, it is just a convenient way for the establishment view of things to be seen as the correct version, all the time, every time. In fact, it is common for “hit pieces” or “debunking articles” to pick extremely fringe and not very populated conspiracy theories. This in turn makes all conspiracies on a subject matter look crazy. Skeptics magazine and Popular Mechanics, among many others, did this with 9/11. They referred to less than 10% of the many different conspiracy theories about 9/11 and picked the less popular ones, in fact, they picked the fringe, highly improbable points that only a few people make. This was used as the “final investigation” for looking into the conspiracy theories. Convenient, huh? In fact, if one were to look into conspiracy theories, they will largely find that thinking about a conspiracy is associated with lunacy and paranoia. Some websites suggest it as an illness. It is also not surprising to see so many people on the internet writing about conspiracy theories in a condescending tone, usually with the words “kool-aid,” “crack pot,” or “nut job” in their articulation. This must be obvious to anyone that emotionally writing about such serious matter insults the reader more than the conspiracy theorist because there is no need to resort to this kind of behavior. It is employed often with an “expert” who will say something along the lines of, “for these conspiracies to be true, you would need hundreds if not thousands of people to be involved. It’s just not conceivable.” One more thing to consider, have you noticed that if the conspiracy is involving powerful interests with the ability to bribe, threaten or manipulate major institutions (like the mafia, big corporations or government) then don’t you find it odd when people use one of those as the “credible” counter-argument? What I mean is, if you are discussing a conspiracy about the mafia, and someone hands you a debunking article that was written by the mafia, it doesn’t seem like it would take rocket science to look at that with serious criticism and credibility. This is the case with many conspiracies. In fact, I am handed debunking pieces all the time written in many cases by the conspirators in question. Doesn’t this seem odd to anybody else but me?

Thanks everyone.

I would not try to aurgue with him. He does not carry on a reasonable conversation. Simply throws out the "we never went to the moon" therory every time someone posts a new topic that he does not agree with.

[video:youtube]http://www.secretsofthefed.com/troops-ordered-to-kill-all-americans-who-do-not-turn-in-guns-video/

Planning 6 night trip to Yosemite next July with the family. I have a 6 and 4 year old who have both seem a fair about of rock climbing indoors and out. Any ideas on an area in Yosemite that is kid friendly? Even a tall boulder that I can throw a rope over? Thanks in advance.

I have not heard anything about this but why could it not be true?

Black mama.....

How many people actually watched the video? Or at least part of it to get it?

Discuss. Or is there a need too.....might want to take up arms. [video:youtube]http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?next_url=/watch%3Fv%3D6NMr2VrhmFI%26feature%3Dplayer_embedded

Always good advice. How come you dont follow your own advice?

What Al Qaeda?

Really? Where? Where do these press statements come from? The press? Who owns them? THINK MAN......THINK.