Dechristo

Anyone have any experience with one of these? Mike Layton, what you say?

My balls are "Hubris" and "Fatuous".

Has no one learned the lessons taught in Vertical Limit?

anything but barefoot is pussy fare.

You spell "Idaho" funny. Climbing on a wall with a gal on TR, she suddenly began to freak. Screaming, pushing away to pendulum, waving arms and legs fiercely, my calls for an explanation were not answered. I lowered her and after a few moments of calm she breathlessly explained of a swarm of bees and her hyper-allergy to bee stings. Incredulous, as I would have seen a swarm and did not, I let it go. Later, she admitted the lack of allergy, but life-long presence of entomophobia.

I'm promised 72 CJ's in Heaven.

excuse moi, I misspelled "cum". humma...humma...humma...humma...HAMAS!!!

Yes, I am aware of your origin. Of course you are. For, although, many have speculated broadly to origins extra-terrestrial, you know I come from the warm confines of Uranus.

Talk about a coincidental seque! When I saw Traffic, they were obviously saving "Low Spark of High-Heeled Boys" for the encore. Despite a 10-15 minute ovation following their final tune, they never came back on stage. The next day, I read in the newspaper the reason there was no encore: Stevie Winwood, after leaving the stage, was hit in the head with a wine canteen (bottle).

So, my choice of the category that is the most loose in definition, allows for the greatest variety of options/choices (allows participation in any party primary), and still allows me to vote is simply another "narrow-minded category"? If you're only pointing out an existential notion of "refusing definition equates definition", I accept it. But, in light of the original topic - my perceived political Righteyness - your assertion doesn't square. I enjoy the freedom to choose to participate-in/support modern notions of causes "liberal" or "conservative" as my current sensibilities desire, without the requirement of forsaking contrary views to a more "narrow-minded" toeing of a Party line. Your labeling is allegorical to the blind man describing an elephant (or donkey, choose any Party's logo animal,) by only touching one aspect of the animal. It seems your lack of sight leads you to familiarity with the area beneath animals' tails only.

Looks more like you're em-bare-assed for the exposition of your weak-sauciness. How dare you call me "NON-AFFILIATED"!!! MODERATORZZZZZ!!!!1

If this subject is the "rightey" litmus test, I guess Barack and I will just have to live with it. Though, Obama's criticism is more virulent. You guys are joking, right? You can't really be that shallow.

The narrow-minded must have labels and boxes for most things. As if this were a defining issue...

So, Matt, anyone to the right of you is a "rightey"? I don't denigrate Carter's effort. It's admirable. I only comment on what I perceive to be its potential benefit to peace in that region at this time: nil.

Carter holds no sway; surely, the good ol' boys of Hamas know this. Their hatred of an American icon being slightly less than that of Israel, they played nice and humored him.

love the lamb

dot com

Flaccid flabby manboobs hanging from a ball-less hitch.

"God bless you."

I wish you the best of success with "Project Tvash".

With practice, you'll probably become a better homosexual.

The Mullah Minuet

maybe it would be so they can see the halftime show