Jump to content

Dechristo

Members
  • Posts

    10288
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dechristo

  1. bene bene, bravo.
  2. Prehensile genitalia. works for the women,too.
  3. Some of it is. oh yeah? like which part of the science is "liberal propaganda"? It was not suggested that "some of" the data portion of the science was "liberal propaganda" (although, we all know data can be manipulated if desired), but, that "some of" the reports of attributable affects are exagerated; this is promulgated by both the Left and Right. If you swalllow everything you hear and read as credible and are unable, or unwilling, to discern apart from political alignment implausibility, you will follow many primrose paths. You've witnessed many flamboyant scientific claims by both the Left and Right on this subject. I suspect you've read more into my statement than was there... again. Wherever people and money are involved, there is bias. playing on words again ... individual bias cannot explain that 99.99% of the science says warming is real... No, money and people is a very effective formula for bias. Don't you question who funded research and speculate of bias if the results are not acceptable to you? Also, my statement reflected on the folly of those that write-off all of the data as "liberal hogwash"; it should be easy to construe my acceptance of the reality of global warming. It seems your biased judgment of me inhibits your interest in understanding what I write. There can be no doubt of an affect, it is the great extent that has yet to be quantified... doubtful it ever will; quite a complex equation, probably with variables yet to be known and defined. source (reputable, please). which greenhouse gas? certainly not CO2 (pinatubo was in 1991): http://www.magazine.noaa.gov/stories/images/maunaloacarbondioxide.jpg Sorry, don't remember the study. I read it sometime around '95. Well, you've matched my "study suggested" statement with a patent claim. Very bold considering your claim requires at least three orders of magnitude more conjecture on the emissions from volcanoes in the last 150 years. I agree.
  4. I speculate there exist people who desire to learn for themselves a depth of love, understanding, and forgiveness that can usually only be discovered in a long-term monogamous relationship. Also, I speculate that should they choose to have children, they hope their life-long example of commitment to those aforementioned intangibles will not produce in their offspring the preponderance of insecurity and worship of libido you exhibit.
  5. Promise you'll give her more than one ring later... around the collar, around the tub, around the toilet. OWWWW! My wife just slapped me upside the head and gave me a ringin' in my ears.
  6. A simple equitable solution: he keeps her dowry.
  7. The custom of wearing a ring is that of wearing someone else's ring. It signifies a bond to the owner... historically, it is not a gift. If one wishes to break the bond to the owner, be it man, club, pope, or king, they return the symbol of the bond to the owner. Unless, you want to break it off in his ass... then, you sell the ring and hire a brute squad.
  8. you mean like sex ooolaalaa Sexula. That's therapeutic sex involving spatulas.
  9. Interesting job you have there. Esspecially, in light of the context of the thread "Sufferfest".
  10. Some of it is. However, there is, no doubt, a reciprocal number of people who write-off all of the data as "liberal hogwash". Wherever people and money are involved, there is bias. The argument is not as much about data as about causes. One study suggested that the greenhouse gases emitted during the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo (sp?) in the Philipines surpassed the entirety of all affects by humans since the Industrial Revolution. Yes.
  11. Dechristo

    Could it be?

    Polly wants a crackhead!
  12. Dechristo

    Could it be?

    Watch you don't get hooked by the beak, matey.
  13. Dechristo

    Could it be?

    Ahhhhhh... I see now. "ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR" comes from when they used the wrong end of the parrot. Always wondered where that came from. It's a little known fact that pirates intentionally wiped against the feathers when they REALLY needed to "swab the deck". BAHWWWCK! Polly wants a cracker!
  14. Yes, the mountaineers of 10,000 years ago rued a similar prospect. Of course, at that time it was all those damn Wooly Mammoths and their stinking biogas that fucked the notion of a climatological static norm.
  15. Dechristo

    Could it be?

  16. Dechristo

    Could it be?

    IT'S ALIVVVVVE!!!!
  17. Dechristo

    Could it be?

    The RCMP spokesman courteously omitted devulgence of the discovery of the most extensive and elaborate collection of artificial vaginas (AV) and dummies ever confiscated in a law enforcement action. It appeared many of the AVs were of the suspect's own creation.
  18. Dechristo

    i saw

    One should consult their gynecologist for this malady. Especially if this symptom is matched with the "bigger tail" mentioned earlier. I believe this presentation belongs to proctology. ...unless the appendage belongs to the little man in the boat.
  19. the monosyllabicly challenged
  20. Only due to access/remoteness. What's your planned route on the peak and approach? How long in the area? There's a number of climbs I'd like to do in that area of the range - one a five to six pitch ice/mixed. A spectacularly beautiful wilderness area.
  21. Dechristo

    i saw

    One should consult their gynecologist for this malady.
  22. Hock the ring, then she can pay to take out the ads and have total creativity in where and how to expose the blaggard.
  23. And just how did she discover his involvment in the online dating service? Could it be she was there covertly herself? HMMMMM???
×
×
  • Create New...