foraker

It's definitely not Anchorage....

You're wasting your breath and time on this one. As JayB said, "You can't reason a man out of something he didn't reason his way into".

I think the appropriate question is: When did it become NOT OK to have porn on Spray? I don't recall getting that memo... Maybe I did but just ignored it because I thought you weren't serious.

I assume there is a fairly high objective hazard associated with static electricity, sleeping cats, and discarded toys.

The Grand Canyon exists because God doesn't use fluoridated water.

You didn't mention if you had a PLB with you. If you didn't, you're a danger to yourself and a potential burden to society. Think of your family!

Your infantile understanding of science, let alone astrophysics, is a an insult to infants. We'll not even get into your understanding of religion and epistemology. JayB has the right tack: ridicule you without getting sucked into a pointless, and ultimately fruitless, 'debate'.

Stating that everything we know is wrong isn't really a scientific argument, it's an assertion. The assertion that you've made is basically a cop out because it keeps you from having to educate yourself and understand something complex (not that radioactive dating is as complex as, say, string theory). No one is available now to verify if Jesus existed so Jesus is only a theory, right?

Reminds me of a quote about economists: "Well, it works fine in reality, but does it work in theory?" Someone's always convinced the last guy didn't get it right or was corrupt and that won't happen this time.

Why not hook it up to a generator and we can all have perpetual energy then? Yay!

Carter occasionally said it that way, too, as I recall.... Isn't that ironic?

I assume you're joking. If you know of "Porky's" and fail to recognize "Cool Hand Luke", well, you are your own worst enemy.

I sense you are using the word 'whore' in a demeaning way that perpetuates your anachronistic patriarchal modality.

Is that a sink or a male bidet?

While you're all out playing video games, Beckey is stealing your women....which really pisses him off because you don't have any.

wot? no eviscerated penguins?

And since nothing like a view from the right gets this place all riled up like a bobcat in a wet burlap bag, I submit the following. linky Given our loveable guv's recent statements vis-a-vis budget surpluses and education, maybe this will make the fur fly and send kevbone home with a warm fuzzy. Or, it'll fall over DOA and kevbone will have to chew a cold bone in his lonely wet cave. Your choice.

This sounds vaguely familiar now that you mention Friedman. Will have to dig this up.

I couldn't get past the first 15 seconds. The first thing I noticed was the cameraman/woman chowing down on some Doritos. The whole thing was an ugly (in more than one sense) LSD flashback.

Interesting idea JayB. One question though, what if said kid isn't working for an iPod and new amps but for college. Expect him to have his 520 set up or something? How does that work if he's not just trying to cover tuition but books and food and all those annoying administrative fees?

The point is, Mr. Mentally Challenged, is that you have presented no clinically-based peer-reviewed 'conflicting evidence' apropos flouridation. You've wasted a lot of bandwidth touting your 'superior lifestyle choices' but haven't spent much time backing up your argument against what we were talking about initially. You're starting to sound like a politician: obfuscate and misdirect.

12. Time to do what we all say we are going to do and solo Thermogenesis.

For water flouridation, that's a pretty lousy analogy.

One extreme result of this mindset is, of course, that no scientific studies are valid unless they validate your preconceived notion of what the answer should be. Should you not have proof of conspiracy, or at least strong circumstantial evidence of it, before claiming one exists?