-
Posts
1482 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by chris
-
rant: to harangue; a loud bombastic declamation expressed with strong emotion ahhh, I feel better now. thanks for listening
-
My rant: One of the most beautiful things about climbing, in all its disciplines, is the lack of official judges. OK, professional climbing competitions have judges. But in our sport we are judged by our peers. Or are we? It appears that our ranks are filled with armchair wannabe’s, who are allowed – hell, even encouraged – to voice their opinion on forums like CascadeClimbers.com. “Soloing is an unacceptable risk.” “I would never do that to someone else.” “That’s a death route, only done to chest-beat.” “The objective hazard is unacceptable.” “You didn’t take enough gear.” “That practice is unsafe.” Well, fuck you. I didn’t start climbing to win the acceptance and friendship of wankers like you. I started climbing to challenge myself, to my fucking standards, and not the standards of some fucking committee and certainly not to the standards of some bloody assholes that wouldn’t stop for a moment, take a deep breath, and consider the possibility that someone may do differently. You don’t like what someone else is doing? Than go out and do it different. You don’t like that route? Then go climb something else. You think that a discipline, a route, a face, or a mountain is unsafe? Than don’t go there. You think the risk is unacceptable? This sport, in all of its manifestations, is defined, driven, and progressed by the acceptance of risk, and by those who are willing to accept more. If that level of risk is beyond your envelope, than accept that fact, be happy with your own accomplishments, and move fucking on. But the last thing you should be doing is criticizing the decisions of other who accept more risk than you. Who should qualify as my peer? Who gets to pass judgment on my actions, whose opinions actually matter to me? Feel free to speak up if you think you’ve done something similar or something bigger. I’m willing to answer questions, clarify statements, and accept judgment from my betters. The rest do not qualify, and you do not get to pass judgment on me. You opinion is neither asked for, cared about, nor does it contribute to the conversation. If you haven’t climbed in the discipline, made similar decisions, accepted similar consequences, or have all the facts, and still insist on throwing in, you are a fucking bloody stupid fucking wanker. OK, rants over. Piss off.
-
Yeah, even with your icefall. What's acceptable or not is decided by my climbing partner and I. Phil, you're not invited.
- 82 replies
-
- north cascades
- johannesburg
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Loren and Jens, Congratulations on a great adventure! Since your route is a Grade V, I believe it qualifies for an entry in the AAJ. Please consider it.
- 82 replies
-
- north cascades
- johannesburg
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
How's that Chirp? Feel better?
-
Petzl ProTraxion 's!!!
-
Thanks,Marcus but I'm really looking for clarification of this space hauling concept, not standard wall hauling.
-
Yo moderators - can we break this into a new thread from post #577823 (Mike's first post about the new article).
-
exciting How would you set up a mechanical advantage system that would let you do this? I can picture a simple 1:1 system, but I'm having problems moving past that.
-
In the latest copy of Gripped, Tommy Caldwell recommends "space hauling" using a 20-30' line and the wall hauler backed up. Can anyone clarify what he's doing for me?
-
Why's PNW climbing so great? I count my blessings every time I think of Iowa. Or Missouri, Mississippi, and Louisiana.
-
Wow, thanks for the information, Joseph. Mine are 3 years old. I did take some full fledged 15+ foot falls this winter on a few of them without notice, but I was starting to consider replacing them anyways. I'll be happy to mail you a stack of dyneema slings next time your doing a test set.
-
OK, some I'm trying to get thumbnail images of my photos in the Gallery onto my trip report. I can ling the location, but it doesn't show the actual picture on the post. If you've read my posts you know that I am seriously challenged by modern technology, polysyllabic words, multi-tasking, and basically any writing that doesn't include spell-check. Let's assume I have difficulty following lego instructions. Please give me clear, simple, step-by-step instructions on how I can make this happen.
-
Wow, can't believe I read through all of that. Can't believe even more that I'm posting too. Sick fuck that I am. Just as its unsafe to run-out a pitch just because its easy for the leader-instructor, it is also unsafe for a leader-instructor to inappropriately sew-up a moderate or easy crack. Both instances set a poor example to participants-students. Speed is safety, and a proper balance of risk with movement needs to be discussed, shown, and experienced. I have personally witnessed several instances where the Mounties overly conservative approach to a practice increased the level of risk instead of mitigating it. I think that the Mounties are great at teaching technical skills, but are weak in teaching judgement. Judgement is gained by experience - the more experience you obtain, and evaluate afterwards, the better your judgement becomes. That's why a NOLS or OB course mountaineering or rock climbing course is four weeks long - to give the participants time to learn the techniques, build some experience with a bank of climbs, develope some judgement by evaluating the experiences, and then repeat the cycle two or three more times. As a non-member (and not likely to become one), I have no idea what the Mounties instructional processes are like. But they seem to need to either a) introduce the idea of evaluating experience to develop proper judgement or b) require their beginning and intermediate members to gain more experiences before instructing.
-
I own the Grivel Evolution - equivalent to the Venom, and paired it with a Grivel AlpLight hammer. I was able to climb with North Couloir on North Peak in the Sierras (solid AI3) with no problem. Its a great pairing if you know you have to do some glacier travel and some low technical ice. Other routes I'd tackle with these tools: the North Ridge and Coleman Headwalls on Mt. Baker in late conditions, Liberty Ridge on Rainier.
-
Blake I'd argue that Washington as a state isn't a sport-climbing destination. Sure, there are several crags, but none of them are worth writing home about. If Eliza is actually on a climbing road trip and has some destination flexibility, I'd recommend heading south to Smith or north to Skaha instead. But if she's here for short visit, is a competent and experienced multi-pitch climber, and wants to check out what all the fuss is about for herself, than IB is perfect. An hour from downtown Seattle, 20+ pitches, looooonnnnggggg. Let's not hijack this post.
-
The climb is great for the length and exposure. Unless you stay right behind them, I would never climb this route with another party. Though a two-team ascent could be ideal - with two teams and 60-70m ropes you'd have the two ropes you need for the rappels. Since the climb goes right up the center of a large bowl, and crosses a large and loose 4th class zone, every rock crying "freedom!" gets funneled right at climbers on pitch 14 or lower. Two 60 meter ropes are mandatory for this climb - 70meters would be even better, as some of the rappels are rope-stretchers, and the fourth class route-finding crux of the route requires a little mandatory downclimbing on big bivy-type ledges above a big drop. Eliza, please excuse the initial response. IB has gathered some conflict, if you couldn't tell by some of the crotchety replies. Some local climbers are upset that the climb breaks with tradition in the Northwest, and other user groups were upset initially with the work the FA team took to establish an approach trail. We've had this conversation before. IB is worth climbing, even if some of you are too slow and cranky to check it out. You should be ashamed of recommending EXIT 32 or 38 instead!
-
My friend Cosmin has just started a brand-spanking new China Climbing forum. And by brand new I mean 5 members, 4 posts, lots of form but little content. But he needs your support! If you've been to China or are thinking of going to China, please register and join the China Climbing forum! http://www.hostingphpbb.com/forum/index.php?mforum=climbinginchina
-
My friend Cosmin has just started a brand-spanking new China Climbing forum. And by brand new I mean 5 members, 4 posts, lots of form but little content. But he needs your support! If you've been to China or are thinking of going to China, please register and join the China Climbing forum! http://www.hostingphpbb.com/forum/index.php?mforum=climbinginchina
-
We just fit four men, comfortably, in a megalight on a three-day ski traverse. I've sat out two major storms, with winds 50mph+ in a megamid in the spring and summer. The biggest danger wasn't the tent fabric failing, but the cords used to anchor it down! In both cases we made it through only a little wet. The biggest drawback is the lack of bug netting, which can be a real problem. If I anticipate that, I'll opt for a traditional tent. Despite my raves, I decided to purchase a BD Lighthouse instead of a BD Megalight, even though they weigh the same and the Megalight has more space. I factored in the considerations that I usually climb with only one other person and I hope to be doing some bigger climbs that will require bivy's enroute. A smaller freestanding tent like the Lighthouse just gives a few more options for where to sleep.
-
dude, shouldn't you be studying for chiropracty school or some shit? this has to be one of the best thread resurrections of all time!
-
Its a good question, and my opinion is that commitment is only really considered when distinguishing between Grade V, VI, and VII routes. The American/YDS system doesn't really allow for commitment to be considered like it is in French or New Zealand Alpine Grades. And is commitment determined by how far you are from the pavement, or just when you can take off the rope? You can bail off of Infinte Bliss to the right as high up as pitch 10 - is it still a Grade V? The Mathes Crest in Toulumne is never more than 80 meters above the ground. And in this case, the Twin Sister High Route was very commiting. If at any point we needed to bail for an emergency, we knew it would take a full day and at least 10 miles of hiking to reach pavement.
-
Grade V=more than one day
-
Climb: Twin Sister Range, North Cascades-Twin Sister High Route Date of Climb: 5/12/2006 Trip Report: Twin Sister High Route, Grade V, 4th class, snow/ice 60 degree ascent, 45 degree ski descent. Possibly the first recorded ski traverse of the Twin Sister Range, North Cascade Mountains, by Mark Allen, Greg Balco, Paul Kimbrough, and Chris Simmons. May 12, 13, and 14, 2006. Photos for this trip can be found in the Gallery, Twin Sister High Route 1 to Twin Sister High Route 67. I'll try to edit in links to the pictures in the days to come. This trip was inspired by a previous climbing trip to the North Twin Sister Peak in February 2005. In the fall of 2005, I started to trace out a possible traverse route on topographical mapping software. During the 2006 winter, I found three other excellent skiers who were foolish enough to say yes; Paul, Greg, and Mark. Mark and I met a month before the trip to look over the route and peer at a series of photos provided by John Scurlock. The route looked possible. The whole team met again in two weeks before the trip to look over the route, John’s photos, and discuss gear requirements. We met Thursday night at my house to pack and make some final food purchases at the grocery store. Early Friday morning we cached Greg’s car at the end of the road for the North and South Twin Sister Peak climbs, and my girlfriend Patsy dropped us off at the other end near Hamilton. The access information is described below. Friday, 12 May 2006, Day One: We didn’t start where we originally intended and we needed to get a view of the range to get our bearings. Low clouds and snow showers kept us guessing until a lucky break in the weather while crossing an “artificial alpine zone” provided us with the view we needed. An hour and a half of skinning gained us the spine of the range immediately below the southernmost named summit, Step Sister Peak. Following the ridge north required a final boot pack to the summit, earning our first descent of the trip, the North Face of Last Sister Peak. From there we crossed the ridge to the east again and traversed the glacier on the east aspect of Nancy Peak, crossed a cleaver nick-named the Southern Divide and gained the glacier below the east aspect of Barbara Peak, which we provisionally named the Ripple Glacier. We climbed and skied in a zigzag pattern across the Ripple and Trisolace Glaciers until we reached the Saddle Slabs and Twin Crests, our camp for Friday night. Saturday, 13 May 2006, Day Two: We got an early start and skied down the eastern slopes of Twin Crests and the Twin Crests Glacier before climbing back up to camp, shouldering our packs, and crossing the Saddle to the west side of the range. Dropping packs again in the bowl underneath the South Face of Little Sister Peak, we watched Mark ski the proudest line of the trip, climbing and descending the South Face Couloir. Afterwards we hiked up to the summit ridge of Cinderella and skied the North Face, continuing down the Greater Green Creek Glacier before heading back up to the Little Sister-Cinderella Col and continuing north along the west side of the range linking together the little glaciers and cirques on the west slopes of Little Sister, Hayden, and Skookum Peaks, before finally hitting the ridge wall blocking our access to the Sisters Glacier at 4pm. This proved to be the crux of the trip. Difficult 4th class and steep snow with heavy packs and skis required us to rope up. We also discovered our first mistake – Mark’s 9mm rope turned out to be 20 meters long, not matching up well with Greg’s 8mm 30-meter rando line. With only one thin rack for both teams, I led the first short pitch without a pack, belayed everyone up, and then rapped down and re-climbed the pitch with my pack on a top rope while Mark led a second shorter 20 meter pitch to the snowfield. Since Mark and Paul had the shorter rope, they led the way as we simul-climbed the following 100+ meters of steep snow to the ridge top. We gained the ridge with perhaps a half-hour of light left. John’s photos and the map show the Sisters Glacier clearly reaching the ridge top at the lowest notch immediately south of South Twin Sister. Instead we were looking down at 100 meters of rappelling. The ridge terrain was protected by numerous gendarmes, so we opted to rap off the ridge top where we were freezing in the wind, and finding our way down. We had to pull head-lamps out after the first 20 meter rappel to a horn. From there, we tied the two ropes together for a single strand, 40 meter rappel, which Mark down-climbed. Being his idea, and not realizing I was waiting for him to offer “Rock-Paper-Scissors”, he took my silence as refusal and offered to do it himself. Thank God. We were all pretty hammered at this point, and I was not happy. Another single strand, 50 meter rappel over a blank, verglassed rock wall reached the glacier. We left the rope to collect the next day and stumbled down to the flats of the glacier finally setting up camp at 2:30am. When we finished dinner and hot drinks, we were all nodding off over our bowls and the sky was beginning to brighten. Sunday, 14 May 2006, Day Three: We were forced up at 9:30am by the bright light and heat of the day. A hard discussion over breakfast reached an agreement to forego an attempt to retrieve the ropes. As it turns out, the 8mm rappel line was rubbing over two rock edges, and neither Mark nor I were willing to risk jugging back up the line with a Tibloc and Reverso. We looked around to see if there was an easier way to climb up and traverse over using the hanging end of the 9mm strand to belay with, but saw nothing. The rope is still there and both of us expect to return later this year to retrieve it. At 11pm we skinned and climbed up to the notch we had hoped to reach the day before and discovered why we had missed it. A full 40 meter pitch of 5th class chimney would have been required to reach the notch from the west side. This would not be possible for this team or with our packs. Our curiosity satisfied, we skied a couple of laps on the Sisters Glacier before descending below the North Ridge of South Twin Sister Peak and traversed across the Sisters Glacier to the North Ridge of North Twin. Once again, our intended notch looked good from our side on the east, but was cliffed out on the west. We continued lower down the ridge to the next notch which did prove passable. However, we ended up 1000’ below our intended route and a final skin gained us the bench below the North Face of North Twin Sister. A final descent through mashed-potato snow lead to a clear cut and road beneath the West Ridge where we were forced to take our skis off at 3800 feet. The final 5 miles of hiking in our boots finally ended when we crossed the welded steel of the Middle Fork Nooksack Bridge, and walked over to Greg’s car. It was over. Conclusions and Lessons Learned: We traveled 30 hours in three days, covered 21 miles, gained 12,000 feet, descended 14,000 feet, skied every single permanent snowfield/ice field/glacier except for the Twin Glacier according to the USGS topo and made significant descents from the North Faces of Last Sister, South Twin Crest, and Cinderella; and the South Face of Little Sister. There are two ways to access the Sisters Glacier which must be reached in order to finish the traverse. We don’t recommend following our route over Mirage Peak. The first possible route is to cross the Greater Green Creek Glacier to the east of Hayden and Skookum Peaks and climb a steep snow couloir that leads directly to the Sisters Glacier. Another possibility is to climb the South Face of South Twin Sister and descend the North Face. A 60m rope would be ideal. Two 60 meter ropes are necessary if you choose to follow our line. A speed traverse would probably work best from North to South, because one could descend the Sisters Glacier Couloir to the Green Creek Glacier instead. We originally had hoped to climb and ski the North Face of South Twin and then ascend the South Gully of North Twin to ski the North Face. Saturday’s climbing over the ridge, our lack of sleep, and the incredible heat that hit us on Sunday put a stop to any of our ideas. We gave a number of provisional names to a number of features to make conversations easier: Nancy Glacier – located in the east bowl of Nancy Peak Southern Divide – the cleaver that forms where the NE Ridge of Nancy and the SE Ridge of Barbara Peaks merge and separate the Nancy and Ripple Glaciers Ripple Glacier – located in the east bowl of Barbara Peak Trisolace Glacier – located in the three basins NE of Trisolace Peak Twin Crests Basin – located NE of the Twin Crests and Saddle Slabs Little Sister Cirque – located in the west bowl of Little Sister Peak Hayden Cirque – located in the west bowl of Hayden Peak Moraine Cirque – located in the north bowl of Skookum Peak Northern Divide – the great headwall between Skookum and South Twin Sister that separate the Green Creek and Sister Glaciers Mirage Peak – the 200-foot tall summit of the South Ridge of South Twin, which we climbed up and over at its highest point Twin Glacier – located in the bowl on the west side of the ridge separating the North and South Twins North Twin Glacier – located in the basin NE of North Twin I’ve tried to keep this based in fact as much as possible. The crazy and funny stories that come with this trip should be heard with a beer. Chris Simmons Gear Notes: Typical backcountry ski and avalanche equipment. Each member carried a transceiver, shovel and probe. Greg was on tele-gear. Ski crampons 1 Megamid tent 2 pocket rocket stoves with four canisters, two pots, and one tea pot ice hammer 1 picket rack: 6 knifeblades, stoppers #4-#10, #0.75-#1-#2 cams, #10 hex, 2 ice screws, 4 shoulder length slings with biners, two double length slings with biners ropes: 9mm, 20 meters & 8mm, 30 meters Each: helmet, harness, crampons, ice axe, belay device, three locking carabiners, one cordellete Approach Notes: The Upper South Fork of the Nooksack River is closed by the Forest Service as Critical Elk Habitat from 1 November to 1 July. This effectively eliminates accessing the ridge from Baker Lake. The logging services follow suit on their private land upstream from Howard Creek. I convinced the Forester at Sierra Cascade Industries that this trip was part of my studies in Adventure Recreation, contributing directly to my degree and my professor vouched for my academics. We received permission to be dropped off via the roads up Howard Creek, provided that we were careful around and didn’t interfere with logging operations that were in progress. Crown Pacific sold their land holdings to three different logging companies and those three companies have an agreement to minimize non-business access as much as possible to minimize interference. I don’t expect to get this permission again. Next time I plan to use our back-up plan, which is to drive as close as possible to the summit of Mount Josephine, hike up and over, drop down to the South Fork and climb back out to Bear Lake. This route is only 3.8 miles as the crow flies, but 9.5 miles of logging roads. The good news is that if you wait for the snow line to be at or below 2000 feet, this could be accomplished entirely on skis. Otherwise, bring a pair of shoes.
-
I'm really trying to figure out how far up the valley its located.