Greg_W

Have you ever heard of playing the devil's advocate, you nitwit?

Hm, I'll have to go home and check. I think it said I was laidback, non-confrontational, and open to new ideas. Hm, maybe I took it drunk.

You haven't uncovered shit except that you cannot adequately defend your beliefs. If you would like to know what I believe, let's get together and we can discuss it.

Maybe, Allison, that is because he can't adequately defend his position. If one has a position that can be adequately defended, even if I don't agree, I can respect that. j_b is just clutching at bullshit straws.

Dude, the belay slave likes it. Doesn't she?

You did? I must have missed it; please enlighten me. I know the basis for what I believe to be right and wrong. It seems that we disagree, so I am asking where your belief is right and wrong is based. Get it?

Thanks for again dodging the question, j_b. Good job missing MtnGoat's point that, you, as one who feels entitled to a part of the fruits of my labor without my consent are indeed enslaving me. Now, answer my questions if you can. If you can't, be a man and admit it, otherwise shut the fuck up.

Well quoted, Muffy. Really I am trying to get to the basis of what and where j_b's understanding of 'right' and 'wrong' came from.

Answer the fucking question, you asshole! Or can you? It seems that this is where your pathetic argument starts to unravel.

My response shows nothing of my opinion of slavery. Please get off your high fucking horse. You brought up slavery, I am taking the opposite side for the sake of debate. By the way, you haven't answered by previous question: What are the definitions of right and wrong that you use to come to the conclusion that slavery is wrong? Second, where did these definitions originate from?

Jim - I have seen no logic in any of j_b's posts on this subject. My whole point is: where is he getting his definitions of "right" and "wrong"? Isn't that a valid question? In order to discuss such a topic these definitions must be agreed upon from the start. If your moral view changes based on your situation then my example has some merit.

AAAAAAHHHHHH!!! Make it stop, make it stop!!! The nightmares are returning!!!!

What is the definition of "right" and "wrong" that you are using. Where do these definitions come from? If you are using some sort of objective relativism (which it sounds like you are), from a white owner's standpoint it sounds right to me: I'm getting my fields harvested, putting some people to work, and making good money with minimal cash outlay. Plus, I get a little strange on the side every once in a while

Now I'm in heaven. That's like, the best of both worlds. Or several worlds. Or, whatever...you just blew my mind, MOS.

you vixen you

I'll say...bark like a dog for me, you little law goddess

Whatever, dude. We're talking Marilyn when JFK had her. That would make her alive, and hot. Dead I'd probably still take her over Monica (B)lewinsky.

Thanks for that explanation, Alex. I have always had a question in my mind about loads on anchors and directionals (and I have an engineering degree ). That is one of the better explanations I've read.

Didn't you learn anything from marriages #1,#2, & #3? Knock that bitch up and wife number four is Shamu.

Actually, sure, I'd take either. I'll bet behind that prim proper Bouvier exterior, Jackie was a raving sex machine!! Or not, since JFK was banging all sorts of other poon. But, could be fun.

Look, I didn't say I would bang her. I just said she wasn't looking so much like a mountain troll as she did before. I second Tex, I'd take Marilyn off JFK's hands for an evening, that's for sure. Yowzaaa!!!

HAHAHA I'm with you AlpineK. Let's break shit!!!!! Yeahhhhh!

So you don't like it, who the fuck cares? Crawl back under your hippy rock.

Nope.

Hey, I said "halfway decent", not goddess-like. Halfway decent, as in, if she weighed half as much she'd look decent.