Dru

i bet its gonna turn out to be somebody was seen streaking a football game with I LOVE YOU BIG LOU written on their ass...

maxim is the mag that showed pictures of steph davis in a thong right? i must admit i don't get it. if you want to ogle pix of chix in a mag why not just buy a playboy? maxim just doesnt seem to go all the way. its like someone that says they love to climb but then it turns out they have been toproping for 10 years and never led anything. as for bookmarked sites what about www.laetitiacasta.com?

quote: Originally posted by krazy 1: slabbin!......... if you catch the right angle you could probably walk up it sweet! - the way i figure, my arm is probably better protected in a hard cast than a soft one right?........ you are gonna want to use your arm(s) for balance, yeah I would figure a hard cast but what do I know, ive never broken anything but a few girls' hearts and some records for most posts to cc.com and i would plan on going in a party of 3 and doing crag type routes cause i would imagine it would be hard to belay all that well with a broken arm. so you are looking for 2 other climbers, one to lead, one to belay, and you just sit around and poach a few topropes. the 5.7 at larabee state park would probably be ideal type of route. or if there is 1 pitch stuff at darrington or static point that you could hike to without having to use your arm to bushwack

quote: Originally posted by Attitude: quote:Originally posted by Cpt.Caveman: Downright non social. Ok Ok some of you dont want to hear this but I dont care. Whine, whine, whine... you want some cheese with that?

quote: Originally posted by rbw1966: quote:Originally posted by Fence Sitter: its not till 4 now and i do not scrum...i am a back! And trask is a "front"? I heard trask is a "slave"

quote: Originally posted by thelawgoddess: quote:Originally posted by Cpt.Caveman: I like to practice leading in my sneakers. It's a regular deal and improves my footwork. You didn't go to Moon Rox? Wildcat Cliff is intimidating but if you have a ropegun it's good too. mountain masters suck for edging! i didn't have a ropegun with me. why weren't you there??? you just need to size them tighter.

quote: Originally posted by Greg W: quote:Originally posted by jordop: I like the old "watch for big hornY sheep" outside of Golden(?) We don't need a sign like that around here; they're all at Trask's house already. Chickens and goats and sheep, my oh my sounds like a Heavy Petting Zoo

quote: Originally posted by jordop: You're on punk: 1. N face Cook 2. N face Welch (suicide?) 3. SW gully Matier I drink Guinness You owe me a beer. I will tell you where it is Im going after this weekend is over. It involves illegal border crossing so I cant say more than this yet in case the guards stop me.

I know in the Gunks that it is a popular pastime to modify road signs to make them Climber-specific, adding a coil of rope etc to the little walking man sign at crosswalks and so on. But I didn't think this was practiced in the Cascades. That is, until my last trip to Leavenworth, where I spotted this!

quote: Originally posted by trask: that fucker looks syphilitic; you best have that checked out its just cherry stains.

maybe you need a prosthetic tongue

quote: Originally posted by Colin: Dru said: "Back to the topic, isnt the East Face of East McMillan Spire still unclimbed?" I think you mean the NE face. I climbed the S face / E ridge about a month ago, and there wasn't any real E face, just an E ridge. However, it does look like there is a large section of face (NE facing) just to climber's left of the N buttress. However, I wouldn't be suprised if the N buttress has never seen a second ascent, so it'd probably be just as much of an adventure. yeah the face around the corner to the left of the n buttress. i thought it faced east. huh.

Post deleted by Lambone

i plan on doing it sometime, maybe when Im fact checking grades for the next guidebook. but next weekend I have a date with an unclimbed couloir, weather and partners permitting. i will give jordan 3 guesses at the unclimbed couloir location and if he gets it i will buy him a beer. if he makes 3 guesses and does NOT get it he can buy me one

jerry moffat was bouldering with a cast on his leg a week after he broke it in a motorbike accident in the early 90's. just dont fall off. i think you can climb slabs without using your arms....broken wing should be no problem. just be glad you aren't a horse cause they shoot'em whn they break a limb.

quote: Originally posted by MtnGoat: "illegal for the lower classes and tolerated/condoned by those in power. if you steal from a rich man you are a thief, if you steal from 1,000,000 poor people you are a savvy businessman." Example please. You forget W. Bush's role in the Savings and Loan scams of the 80's so fast? "if you are poor and smoke crack and get caught you are thrown in prison, if you are jeb bush's daughter you get some cushy optional resort disguised as rehab." and this happens differently...where? Don't make the mistake of comparing the real with the perfect, in a world where the reality is comparing the imperfect with the less imperfect. ya but you claimed that the difference in the US was the rule of law. sounds like the oligarchy getting their way in both places to me. PAGETOP MUIR ON SATURDAY [ 09-17-2002, 01:24 PM: Message edited by: Dru ]

yeah, but only one route on that whole face... it sounds like it goes up the vague buttress on the right side of the face.

Post deleted by Lambone

illegal for the lower classes and tolerated/condoned by those in power. if you steal from a rich man you are a thief, if you steal from 1,000,000 poor people you are a savvy businessman. if you are poor and smoke crack and get caught you are thrown in prison, if you are jeb bush's daughter you get some cushy optional resort disguised as rehab. we need a little Che graemlin. i nominate Iain to find one on the net.

Yes I do not pack it in to wear but wear it for ice cragging where you put it on when you get out of the car, put your harness on, and go climb. Its also a chick magnet when you go clubbing.

quote: Originally posted by fern: I went climbing with 3 people last Sunday and one of them refused to carry the rope even though he only had slippers and a harness in his pack. And then when I blew out the sole of my shoe no-one else would put a rope on anything so we went and ate ice-cream instead. At least I didn't have to pay for that too. What a bunch of losers I went climbing with this chick once and all she did was constantly dis everyone else she knew yada yada yada too bad we're not all perfect like her

Theories abound about what killed off the dinosaurs, but one recent suggestion from an American archeologist has sent shockwaves through the academic world. The archeologist claims that dinosaurs became so gigantic as time progressed that they became too huge to procreate, according to Shukan Hoseki (11/4/99). Most archeologists have been quick to refute the theory, saying that the accepted explanation that a meteor crashed into the Earth sending debris floating up in to the atmosphere and blocking the Sun's rays is correct. "With dinosaurs basically cold-blooded creatures, they weren't able to control whether they were hot or cold. It's a unique theory that they died out because they weren't able to make love, but I think it's more natural to believe that they became extinct because they couldn't adapt to climactic changes," says Kunio Kojima, an Osaka University professor. Others aren't quite so sure, according to Shukan Hoseki. "If you look at Seismosaurus, they were 52 meters long and weighed 100 tons. Carbon checks on its fossils showed that it lived to be about 200. At that rate, it'd be more likely that age rather than size prevented it from mating," says Takakazu Kaneko, a science writer. "But creatures only produce enough seeds to evolve. It's quite possible that the dinosaurs could indeed have grown too big to mate." Rikao Yanagida, head of a think tank, not only refuses to rule out the possibility that dinosaurs died out through lack of sex, he goes a step further, providing a theory based on the assumption that a Seismosaurus had a 2-meter- long, 30-centimeter-thick penis. "If an 800-ton male thrust into a 100-ton female once every second, the impact would be the equivalent of 4,800 tons. That's like a 60-kilogram woman on a bed making love to a 480-kilogram man Ñ about the same as two (former sumo heavyweight) Konishikis!," Yanagida says. Yanagida continues, speaking about dinosaur calorie consumption during sex: "There's a rule that during sex, an animal will consume the equivalent of 180 grams for every 688 kilograms of weight. A 100-ton dinosaur would end up losing 54 kilograms every time it had sex. When the mating season came around, male dinosaurs would get thinner and thinner by the day." Yanagida adds, though, that there is a conclusive reason why there is credence to the sexless dinosaur extinction theory. "Even if you calculated that dinosaurs only have the same impact when thrusting as humans, at 100 tons, thrusting every 6.7 seconds would create 2,200 kilowatts of energy. About 50 percent of that energy becomes noise. If dinosaurs were having sex, the noise would be tremendous. It'd kill any humans within a 130-meter radius. What's more, omnivorous dinosaurs traveled in groups, so when they had sex, the sounds that they emitted would have killed off all the small dinosaurs around them. That robbed the carnivorous dinosaurs of their food, making them extinct, too." [ 09-17-2002, 11:33 AM: Message edited by: Dru ]

Fools! As you can see in the above sattelite photo it is TURTLES ALL THE WAY DOWN!!!

I still dont know how the Earth can be hollow and flat at the same time but obviously it is.

quote: Originally posted by Fence Sitter: yeah mabe on ranier...bu what about in other areas...there has been so much clear cutting that i would think it very difficult to get a 600 year old sample from very many places all over the world. cause we are talkin about micro climatology...within .2 degrees difference... one tree in each state wouldn't even cut it because you are dealing with averages and i can assure you taht in the south there are very few 600 eyar old trees and you must have a large sample covering ALL the areas you are measuring (in their case the world) and you jsut dont have that...for .2 degrees differencein 600 years...i just need more than a pathc in MRNP...and then down in cali...and northern noerthern canada...and very very very few in s. america...etc...seriously how precice can this be? certainly not to .2 degrees C c'mon.... are you gonna tell us how the paleontologists faked the age of fossils and the earth is really flat next