Jump to content

Interesting...


layton

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

undoubtedly the researchers done saw idiocracy:

"More intelligent people don't have more children, so moving away from the trajectory is not going to happen," he said.

 

 

The question is not whether they have more children but whether those children survive long enough to themselves reproduce. if you drunkenly spawn a giant litter of pups and leave'em in the van while you gamble on the rez and they all bake to death, it's the hand of god removing your seed from the gene pool, man!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

undoubtedly the researchers done saw idiocracy:

"More intelligent people don't have more children, so moving away from the trajectory is not going to happen," he said.

 

 

The question is not whether they have more children but whether those children survive long enough to themselves reproduce. if you drunkenly spawn a giant litter of pups and leave'em in the van while you gamble on the rez and they all bake to death, it's the hand of god removing your seed from the gene pool, man!

throwing product at the problem solves all problems :)

 

the allies in ww1

mayflies

drugzzzz!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's common knowledge that conservatives who are not confined to celibacy by the kind of sexual dysfunction so common in that neck of the gene pool will fuck anything that moves and many things that don't; any great, fat pie wagon or 15 year old boy will apparently do. As long as the situation is highly fucked up; restraining orders, child molestation, full employment for crack whores; conservatives are pulling their plentiful weight.

 

Don't expect atheists to 'out pro-create' this mangy excess population, however. We all know they eat their young.

Edited by tvashtarkatena
Link to comment
Share on other sites

eugenics_congress_logo.png

 

You actually have a more astute understanding about the meaning of that article than anyone else. The content of that article has less to do with evolutionary theory as much as it does with Social Darwinism--two different things.

 

“It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind...

Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”

Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in Buck v. Bell

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...