Jump to content

Plus ça change...


KaskadskyjKozak

Recommended Posts

Correct, there is no Due Process involved in placing names on the No Fly List. All that takes place is someone at the FBI decides arbitrarily someone is a threat and then on they go. Regardless of your stand on guns, taking away someone's rights should involve Due Process. It is in the constitution after all.

 

 

yeah, but you keep taking right-of-center stances on positions so Ivan, naturally, must contradict you ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 289
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Correct, there is no Due Process involved in placing names on the No Fly List. All that takes place is someone at the FBI decides arbitrarily someone is a threat and then on they go. Regardless of your stand on guns, taking away someone's rights should involve Due Process. It is in the constitution after all.

 

 

yeah, but you keep taking right-of-center stances on positions so Ivan, naturally, must contradict you ;)

 

Everything looks right of center when you're carrying the water for fascists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correct, there is no Due Process involved in placing names on the No Fly List. All that takes place is someone at the FBI decides arbitrarily someone is a threat and then on they go. Regardless of your stand on guns, taking away someone's rights should involve Due Process. It is in the constitution after all.

 

 

yeah, but you keep taking right-of-center stances on positions so Ivan, naturally, must contradict you ;)

i agree w/ people when i think they're right- occasionally The Others do get to be right too, QED :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could improve the thread up with some Dolly photos, she's get a lot of votes. It would be in a new political party called the Wig (Whig) party. I'm sure they'd be willing to let The Donald in as a founding member. Hillary too.

 

71n4k4MkxyL._UY500_.jpg

 

It's all about style over substance though.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding the ACLU's actions on No Fly Lists - some corrections are in order.

 

In the years immediately following 911, the ACLU filed several lawsuits on behalf of American citizens who were racially profiled while trying to fly. This lead to the end of (blatant, unchecked) racial profiling, with a number of required actions (mandatory training for airline and TSA employees, etc) to ensure the practice actually ended.

 

The ACLU's concern with No Fly Lists has been: How does one get on the list, exactly? By what due process? How is the list verified and validated? How does one appeal to get off the list? How is the No Fly List personal information safeguarded? How long is is kept? With what other commercial or government entities is this information shared and what are the impacts of that sharing on the individuals on the list?

 

Quite a departure from 'being against No Fly Lists', a claim which finds good company in phrases like 'carpet bombing' - staples for those who are long on opinion and volume but short on data, experience, or credibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...