KaskadskyjKozak Posted April 25, 2015 Posted April 25, 2015 Fiscal conservative Reagan 200 billion deficit Fiscal conservative 1st Bush 300 billion deficit Tax and spend liberal Bill Clinton 200 billion surplus Fiscal conservative George W Bush 482 billion deficit Vacation days first year in office Carter : 19, Reagan : 42, Bush sr : 40, Clinton : 21, W Bush : 77, Obama : 26 and how much was b-ho's deficit? you seem to have omitted that... Quote
LUCKY Posted April 25, 2015 Posted April 25, 2015 Fiscal conservative Reagan 200 billion deficit Fiscal conservative 1st Bush 300 billion deficit Tax and spend liberal Bill Clinton 200 billion surplus Fiscal conservative George W Bush 482 billion deficit Vacation days first year in office Carter : 19, Reagan : 42, Bush sr : 40, Clinton : 21, W Bush : 77, Obama : 26 and how much was b-ho's deficit? you seem to have omitted that... Obummers was Inherited but in case no one has told you the economy is recovering and it's a little early to be worried about who is running for POTUS Quote
ivan Posted April 25, 2015 Posted April 25, 2015 everyone's deficit is to some extent inherited and of course the economy, driven by a trillion forces, most beyond the control of any one man, is king that said, the difference between tax and spend vs cut taxes n' spend upon budget deficits ought...like...be intuitive, no? Quote
glassgowkiss Posted April 25, 2015 Posted April 25, 2015 Fiscal conservative Reagan 200 billion deficit Fiscal conservative 1st Bush 300 billion deficit Tax and spend liberal Bill Clinton 200 billion surplus Fiscal conservative George W Bush 482 billion deficit Vacation days first year in office Carter : 19, Reagan : 42, Bush sr : 40, Clinton : 21, W Bush : 77, Obama : 26 and how much was b-ho's deficit? you seem to have omitted that... If you would do a little internet search, you would not be asking this stupid question, you indoctrinated moron. The numbers are not that complicated. Last fiscal year had 474 billion deficit. Last year of Bush presidency had 686 billion. 1998 to 2001 US had actual surplus, starting with 69 billions in 98 and ending with 236 in 1999. There were only 2 other years since end of WWII (1960-0.3 billion and 1969 3billion) of budget surplus. Bush inherited surplus, but it went to deficit already in 2002, in sum of 158 billion. In 2005, his deficit was 318, and it reached a peak in 2009, when TARP payments were due, reaching 1.1 trillion USD. So maybe you should shut the fuck up about "fiscal conservatism", because as you see Republifucks are really good at wrecking up a debt. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted April 26, 2015 Posted April 26, 2015 Fiscal conservative Reagan 200 billion deficit Fiscal conservative 1st Bush 300 billion deficit Tax and spend liberal Bill Clinton 200 billion surplus Fiscal conservative George W Bush 482 billion deficit Vacation days first year in office Carter : 19, Reagan : 42, Bush sr : 40, Clinton : 21, W Bush : 77, Obama : 26 and how much was b-ho's deficit? you seem to have omitted that... Obummers was Inherited but in case no one has told you the economy is recovering and it's a little early to be worried about who is running for POTUS inherited. LOL typical libtard rationalization. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted April 26, 2015 Posted April 26, 2015 everyone's deficit is to some extent inherited and of course the economy, driven by a trillion forces, most beyond the control of any one man, is king that said, the difference between tax and spend vs cut taxes n' spend upon budget deficits ought...like...be intuitive, no? and of course, let's not fail to consider which party was controlling the purse strings during each of the above administrations. Quote
LUCKY Posted April 26, 2015 Posted April 26, 2015 Fiscal conservative Reagan 200 billion deficit Fiscal conservative 1st Bush 300 billion deficit Tax and spend liberal Bill Clinton 200 billion surplus Fiscal conservative George W Bush 482 billion deficit Vacation days first year in office Carter : 19, Reagan : 42, Bush sr : 40, Clinton : 21, W Bush : 77, Obama : 26 and how much was b-ho's deficit? you seem to have omitted that... Obummers was Inherited but in case no one has told you the economy is recovering and it's a little early to be worried about who is running for POTUS inherited. LOL typical libtard rationalization. typical Rush Limbaugh Glen Beck wingnut...try not take'n a side and go with the best that is offered, too far right or too far left is nowhere to be Quote
AlpineK Posted April 26, 2015 Posted April 26, 2015 You know you are [img:center]https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-Txw5DH1el-g/VC2MJPyzQMI/AAAAAAAAC-U/rGJRBq4RN00/w960-h650/10015655_740129782688172_8075936748441484804_n.jpg[/img] Quote
glassgowkiss Posted April 26, 2015 Posted April 26, 2015 Fiscal conservative Reagan 200 billion deficit Fiscal conservative 1st Bush 300 billion deficit Tax and spend liberal Bill Clinton 200 billion surplus Fiscal conservative George W Bush 482 billion deficit Vacation days first year in office Carter : 19, Reagan : 42, Bush sr : 40, Clinton : 21, W Bush : 77, Obama : 26 and how much was b-ho's deficit? you seem to have omitted that... Obummers was Inherited but in case no one has told you the economy is recovering and it's a little early to be worried about who is running for POTUS inherited. LOL typical libtard rationalization. Quoted you real numbers. Are you THAT stupid and do not understand what they mean? Quote
LUCKY Posted April 26, 2015 Posted April 26, 2015 http://www.politico.com/multimedia/video/2015/04/obamas-full-remarks-at-the-2015-white-house-correspondents-dinner.html Quote
Fairweather Posted April 26, 2015 Author Posted April 26, 2015 Bring on the revolution, Special K! Enough of your tough-guy routine. Quote
Buckaroo Posted April 26, 2015 Posted April 26, 2015 Why are you so absorbed with the "fight" between the dems and repugs? You know they are all owned by the 1% and like the WWF the fight is fixed. Hitler was a poor slob from the beer hall, he had no cash. His rise to power was funded by the 1%. They funded and profited from both sides of the fight. Brown Brothers Harriman was the largest US bank to fund him, with Prescott Bush on their board, Bush Jr's grandfather. The British royals also had a hand, their lineage is actually German, they changed their name to Windsor before (during?) the 1st WW. WW2 was actually engineered to put Russia down. They had killed their Tzars and the real rulers (the West's royals) had freaked out about this thinking they were next. Russia actually did about 80% of the fighting against Germany, the US just came in at the end. Prescott Bush supported Hitler up until 1 year after the war started. He was convicted under the trading with the enemy act and his funds confiscated. The European and US industrialists/bankers/royals that funded Hitler were compensated with profits from the slave labor camps, they actually profited from their investments. The Germans attacked Poland using Ford trucks. They counted death camp bodies using IBM punch card computers. And the Zyclon B extermination gas was produced by IG Farben with financial ties to Rockefeller and Standard oil in a company called Standard I.G. Farben. The Nuremberg trials were fixed. They only got the top leaders, many of the lower ranks went free or had reduced sentences. None of the West's financiers were even indicted. Many of the individuals in German intelligence went right into the CIA as it was founded by those from the US that supported Hitler. After the war ended Prescott Bush got his confiscated funds back. The Bush family fortune is based upon these funds, much of which were obtained from the profits of the slave labor camps. The CIA is just the police arm of the 1%. They crush democracies (labeling them communist or socialist) and install dictatorships beholden to the multinational corps. They are the largest volume illegal drug runners in the world. The current operation in Afghanistan represents 80% of the worlds heroin. The Taliban eradicated 90% of a full year's crop of opium. After we invaded the entire crop was re-established. They killed the Kennedy's and engineered and perpetrated OK city and 911. OK city being a test run of the methods used at 911. Quote
Buckaroo Posted April 27, 2015 Posted April 27, 2015 For your recollection, Ivan, here are the Congressional vote totals for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Looks like Democrats had a bigger problem with it than did Republicans: Totals are in "Yea–Nay" format: The original House version: Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%) Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%) Cloture in the Senate: Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%) Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%) The Senate version: Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%) Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%) The Senate version, voted on by the House: Democratic Party: 153–91 (63–37%) Republican Party: 136–35 (80–20%) This is one of the sh*tiest arguments that circulates the internet. Before civil rights the Dems were the party of the conservatives and racist south and the Repugs were the party of the liberals. After civil rights the southern racist dems became repugs and the liberals all became Dem like they are today. In effect the parties flipped ideologies with the advent of civil rights. Quote
Fairweather Posted April 27, 2015 Author Posted April 27, 2015 Why are you so absorbed with the "fight" between the dems and repugs? You know they are all owned by the 1% and like the WWF the fight is fixed. Hitler was a poor slob from the beer hall, he had no cash. His rise to power was funded by the 1%. They funded and profited from both sides of the fight. Brown Brothers Harriman was the largest US bank to fund him, with Prescott Bush on their board, Bush Jr's grandfather. The British royals also had a hand, their lineage is actually German, they changed their name to Windsor before (during?) the 1st WW. WW2 was actually engineered to put Russia down. They had killed their Tzars and the real rulers (the West's royals) had freaked out about this thinking they were next. Russia actually did about 80% of the fighting against Germany, the US just came in at the end. Prescott Bush supported Hitler up until 1 year after the war started. He was convicted under the trading with the enemy act and his funds confiscated. The European and US industrialists/bankers/royals that funded Hitler were compensated with profits from the slave labor camps, they actually profited from their investments. The Germans attacked Poland using Ford trucks. They counted death camp bodies using IBM punch card computers. And the Zyclon B extermination gas was produced by IG Farben with financial ties to Rockefeller and Standard oil in a company called Standard I.G. Farben. The Nuremberg trials were fixed. They only got the top leaders, many of the lower ranks went free or had reduced sentences. None of the West's financiers were even indicted. Many of the individuals in German intelligence went right into the CIA as it was founded by those from the US that supported Hitler. After the war ended Prescott Bush got his confiscated funds back. The Bush family fortune is based upon these funds, much of which were obtained from the profits of the slave labor camps. The CIA is just the police arm of the 1%. They crush democracies (labeling them communist or socialist) and install dictatorships beholden to the multinational corps. They are the largest volume illegal drug runners in the world. The current operation in Afghanistan represents 80% of the worlds heroin. The Taliban eradicated 90% of a full year's crop of opium. After we invaded the entire crop was re-established. They killed the Kennedy's and engineered and perpetrated OK city and 911. OK city being a test run of the methods used at 911. OMG, I had no idea about any of this! Where did you learn all of this??? Ivan? TTK? Off? You guys really want to claim this guy? Quote
Buckaroo Posted April 27, 2015 Posted April 27, 2015 Kennedy would have never escalated it to the level it ended up at. Coincidentally, he was the last decent Democrat this country had. Too bad Bush Sr's CIA killed him then ehh? Quote
Buckaroo Posted April 27, 2015 Posted April 27, 2015 OMG, I had no idea about any of this! Where did you learn all of this??? Def not from Orwell's televisione. and once again all you got is ad-hom. Your "argument" is as ephemeral as the bush boy's brains. Quote
Buckaroo Posted April 27, 2015 Posted April 27, 2015 OMG, I had no idea about any of this! Where did you learn all of this??? Ivan? TTK? Off? You guys really want to claim this guy? The truth needs no support. It's all a matter of historical record. Unless all you read is the re-written history. Quote
Fairweather Posted April 27, 2015 Author Posted April 27, 2015 OMG, I had no idea about any of this! Where did you learn all of this??? Ivan? TTK? Off? You guys really want to claim this guy? The truth needs no support. It's all a matter of historical record. Unless all you read is the re-written history. Actually, um, nevermind. Quote
Fairweather Posted April 27, 2015 Author Posted April 27, 2015 http://www.politico.com/multimedia/video/2015/04/obamas-full-remarks-at-the-2015-white-house-correspondents-dinner.html Wow, guess we don't need Congress anymore. Careful what you wish for. Quote
Buckaroo Posted April 27, 2015 Posted April 27, 2015 http://www.politico.com/multimedia/video/2015/04/obamas-full-remarks-at-the-2015-white-house-correspondents-dinner.html Wow, guess we don't need Congress anymore. Careful what you wish for. It's the WWF, they are all owned by the same corporations Executive orders by President Ronald Reagan 381 George H.W. Bush 166 Bill Clinton 364 George W. Bush 291 Barack Obama 194 (as of 2014-11-21) Quote
Fairweather Posted April 27, 2015 Author Posted April 27, 2015 Yea, dumbshit, I'd say there is a big difference between pardoning the Thanksgiving turkey and effectively pardoning 11 million illegals. (Or, for that matter, imprisoning 100,000 Japanese.) Well done. Quote
Buckaroo Posted April 27, 2015 Posted April 27, 2015 Reagan started the amnesty train when he signed into law the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act, which effectively pardoned 3.2 million illegals. The PTB's want illegal immigration and the pols just do what their paid to do. The PTB's want a cheap labor force, they've even dumped crop prices to put Mexican farmers out of business. The root cause is the job's are available, it would be much easier to control immigration by regulating employers but they won't do that. Tell me Fairweather do you wave misspelled signs at the WWF matches that you attend? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.