layton Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 What's the longest pendulum distance horizontally you could theoretically do if the follower plans on using the same rope to lower and get across. I figured 50' with a 200' rope since the follower needs 2x the amount of rope as distance to the next crack. I also assume the leader would need to belay exactly at the height of the pendulum point. just curious. Quote
keenwesh Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 you could do a penji 100 feet below your lower out point with a 200 foot rope (however far horizontally that is). The leader climbs 100 feet, lowers back to the belay, cleaning gear, and swings. once to the other spot they put the follower on belay and the second follows the penji and unties. Pull the rope through and keep sendin'. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 (edited) Incorrect. If R is the max horizontal distance from pendi fulcrum to leader/belayer as well as the max pendulum length, assuming the leader/belayer is level with the fulcrum, then the follower when fully lowered out will be at a 45 degree angle from the leader/belayer, therefore Rope Length L = 2R + R*SQRT (2) (draw it to see WTF I'm talkin bout) If L = 60m, then max R = L/(2+SQRT (2)) = 60/(2+1.414) =17m this is the max horizontal distance from leader/belayer to fulcrum, as well as the max pendulum length for leader and follower. This is best case - if the follower has to 'wind up' in the opposite direction to make the pendi happen, max R is even shorter. I've also assumed knot length is accounted for by rope stretch. Edited January 24, 2014 by tvashtarkatena Quote
num1mc Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 Depends on how steep the wall is and how big a ripper the second wants to take. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 I've also assumed the leader doesn't just burn a fatty and float past the pendi on his way to awesome land. Quote
layton Posted January 24, 2014 Author Posted January 24, 2014 (edited) I've also assumed the leader doesn't just burn a fatty and float past the pendi on his way to awesome land. Awesome. If I don't like a pitch, I lower out the length of that pitch, and pendulum so hard that I make a half circle and wind up at the next anchor. Edited January 24, 2014 by layton Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 (edited) I go one better - I have my buddy do that while I finish my fatty. Me when you need something like this Cliff Clavenized, Keenwesh when you want to actually get up the pitch, Ivan when things suck and you need to witness something suffering more than you. Edited January 24, 2014 by tvashtarkatena Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 (edited) Although I gotta say I've witnessed the Big Man do some wild-assed shit that got us through. Edited January 24, 2014 by tvashtarkatena Quote
ScaredSilly Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 What's the longest pendulum distance horizontally you could theoretically do if the follower plans on using the same rope to lower and get across. Theoretically, the length of the rope ... Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 (edited) This assume you've got only one rope, per the OP. Method 1 Pro: Faster, good if EZ down low, horiz reach 17m Con: Dangler cn snag while leader penjiz, 2 fulcrums Method 2 Pro: Good if EZ up high, no dangler snag, 1 fulcrum Con: Slower, horiz reach only 15m PenjiLand by PatGallagherArt, on Flickr Edited January 24, 2014 by tvashtarkatena Quote
keenwesh Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 the way I detailed lets both the leader and the follower actually do the pendulum, a plus for me. Penjis are super fun, running back and forth a long ways off the ground is one of the best things about climbing walls. I think ya'll are really overthinking this. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 (edited) Both leader and follower must pendulum in the both methods I've drawn. Nobody gets out alive. I didn't show anybody actually swinging and screaming is all. Edited January 24, 2014 by tvashtarkatena Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 24, 2014 Posted January 24, 2014 (edited) Redux, with screaming pendiz. These are the only ways I could think of to do this with one rope. R = max horizontal distance between the pendi fulcrum and the next anchor assuming both are at the same elevation, if only one rope is used. This is a specific case where you're penjiing over to a spot directly horiz to anchor 1 at max angle of 45. Not sure how much you can push that angle practically speaking. Depends I reckon. Also, if anchor 1 is higher, horiz reach is farther. If its lower, less. This is a specific case for horiz reach = vert between anchor 1 and fulcrum Method 1 Pro: Faster, good if EZ down low, horiz reach 17m Con: Dangler cn snag while leader penjiz, 2 fulcrums Method 2 Pro: Good if EZ up high, no dangler snag, 1 fulcrum Con: Slower, horiz reach only 15m PenjiLand2 by PatGallagherArt, on Flickr Edited January 24, 2014 by tvashtarkatena Quote
num1mc Posted January 25, 2014 Posted January 25, 2014 Both leader and follower must pendulum in the both methods I've drawn. Nobody gets out alive. I didn't show anybody actually swinging and screaming is all. Redux, with screaming pendiz. These are the only ways I could think of to do this with one rope. R = max horizontal distance between the pendi fulcrum and the next anchor assuming both are at the same elevation, if only one rope is used. This is a specific case where you're penjiing over to a spot directly horiz to anchor 1 at max angle of 45. Not sure how much you can push that angle practically speaking. Depends I reckon. Also, if anchor 1 is higher, horiz reach is farther. If its lower, less. This is a specific case for horiz reach = vert between anchor 1 and fulcrum Method 1 Pro: Faster, good if EZ down low, horiz reach 17m Con: Dangler cn snag while leader penjiz, 2 fulcrums Method 2 Pro: Good if EZ up high, no dangler snag, 1 fulcrum Con: Slower, horiz reach only 15m PenjiLand2 by PatGallagherArt, on Flickr Where's Catbirdseat when we need him? Quote
bstach Posted January 25, 2014 Posted January 25, 2014 How do you get from pic 3 to 4 in method 2? It seems a few steps are missing. Quote
layton Posted January 27, 2014 Author Posted January 27, 2014 thanks for the math... always wondered why no one ever tried to figure this out... i would think it would be well known Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 27, 2014 Posted January 27, 2014 I'm gonna try to verify with some actual route info to see what the longest horiz penjis are out there. Don't know if you can do the 45 deg. thing in practice on too many routes. Can also come up with a generalized equation for that ultra nerd. Hittin the road for a bit, back later. Any steps missing in drawings should be easy to figure out. I just drew the essential states required to royally hose oneself regarding a safe retreat. Quote
layton Posted January 27, 2014 Author Posted January 27, 2014 you could get more than 45 degrees with a jet pack Quote
G-spotter Posted January 30, 2014 Posted January 30, 2014 You can get more than 45 degrees each side of vert on a playground swing, so why not on a pendulum? You can't get to 180 degrees (fully horizontal on each side) unless you have solid steel bars instead of chains. Or a rope in this case. Layton, you think switching out the rope for an inflexible rod would be useful for penjis? http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=692253 Some useful links in there Quote
layton Posted January 31, 2014 Author Posted January 31, 2014 oh say, that's a good thought. lots of trees in yosemite you could haul up too Quote
ivan Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 you could get more than 45 degrees with a jet pack if'n you got a jet-pack, wtf you climbing for? Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted January 31, 2014 Posted January 31, 2014 tree+pig=trebuchet. check my math here. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.