KaskadskyjKozak Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 If Paul wins the R nomination, then Obama will crush him. I am not so sure anymore. Obama is pro-war and alot of folks are tired of all the spending. can you be anti-war and be amerikkkan? jesus tap dancing christ, if bush could win in 2004 amidst the shit storm of iraq.... War is American, eh Vanya? Quote
G-spotter Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Rob....I will not vote for the lesser of two evils again....I WONT DO IT. So you vote for the greater one. Classic Bone. Quote
sobo Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 One other reason Rob is Paul will hold all of congress to their Constitutional oath of office.By what mechanism will this be accomplished? He'll just tell them to follow the rules and play nice?It might just be that simple.Is this the point where you pull out Occam's razor...? Quote
ivan Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 War is American, eh Vanya? if motherfuckers would just stop being alive near us... Quote
pink Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 If Paul wins the R nomination, then Obama will crush him. I am not so sure anymore. Obama is pro-war and alot of folks are tired of all the spending. Zakk Wylde would be better than Ron Paul JImmy Fallon for President [video:youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC8ElAhypd4 Quote
j_b Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 (edited) I have read nothing to indicate he has racist skeletons. But I usually don't go on what people say (like Obama, he lost me along time ago)....only on what they do. Actions speak louder than words. You must have not read much about him, then. Do you only get your news from youtube? everyone else knows more about Paul than you do You mean newsletters written by someone else TWENTY YEARS AGO, which he disavows and rejects? Libtards sure are great at beating a long dead horse. Don't get me wrong, Paul is a kook, but he's no racist. Ron Paul is either a liar (my pick based on his voting record) or utterly incompetent for letting someone he refuses to divulge spew racist garbage under his name for decades. Edited December 23, 2011 by j_b Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Ron Paul is either a liar (my pick based on his voting record) or utterly incompetent for letting someone (whom he refuses to name) spew racist garbage under his name for decades. "for decades" - bullshit. 2 decades ago, for a brief period of time, which he immediately rejected. An entirely different matter - but you knew that, didn't you, comrade? Quote
j_b Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Bullshit, he didn't reject immediately what was spewed in his newsletter. Quote
Phil K Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 I have read nothing to indicate he has racist skeletons. But I usually don't go on what people say (like Obama, he lost me along time ago)....only on what they do. Actions speak louder than words. You must have not read much about him, then. Do you only get your news from youtube? everyone else knows more about Paul than you do You mean newsletters written by someone else TWENTY YEARS AGO, which he disavows and rejects? Libtards sure are great at beating a long dead horse. Don't get me wrong, Paul is a kook, but he's no racist. Ron Paul is either a liar (my pick based on his voting record) or utterly incompetent for letting someone he refuses to divulge spew racist garbage under his name for decades. Well, he is from Texas, so there is the chance he could be both a liar and incompetent. 'Kinda like W, but with a much, much worse tailor. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Bullshit, he didn't reject immediately what was spewed in his newsletter. You claimed he let it go on for decades. You're so full of shit it's oozing from your ears. But then again you also believe GWB's defeat of your buddy was a "stolen" election, so you're as much as a kook as Paul (chemtrails!). Quote
j_b Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Bullshit, he didn't reject immediately what was spewed in his newsletter. You claimed he let it go on for decades. Indeed, Ron Paul has been a far right fringe cook for more than one decade. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Bullshit, he didn't reject immediately what was spewed in his newsletter. You claimed he let it go on for decades. Indeed, Ron Paul has been a far right fringe cook for more than one decade. The newsletter content in question did not continue for decades. It's only the questioning about them endlessly from propagandists like you that has continued for decades. And the real question is who has been an extremist cook longer - Paul or j_bot. Quote
rob Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 I grew up in a libertarian household, back when Paul was on the libertarian ticket every year. I had to live surrounded by his bullshit. He was a crazy fucker back then, and he's still a crazy fucker. Quote
j_b Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Bullshit, he didn't reject immediately what was spewed in his newsletter. crickets Quote
j_b Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 I grew up in a libertarian household, back when Paul was on the libertarian ticket every year. I had to live surrounded by his bullshit. He was a crazy fucker back then, and he's still a crazy fucker. "libertarians" like Ron Paul used to be openly racist, yet they eventually realized it wouldn't fly with the electorate. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 I grew up in a libertarian household, back when Paul was on the libertarian ticket every year. I had to live surrounded by his bullshit. He was a crazy fucker back then, and he's still a crazy fucker. "libertarians" like Ron Paul used to be openly racist, yet they eventually realized it wouldn't fly with the electorate. Tell us about Mexicans again, j_bot. Then lecture about "racists" again. Quote
j_b Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Suzzballs like KKK always try to turn anything into a personal argument as if their interlocutor was running for the presidency, Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Suzzballs like KKK always try to turn anything into a personal argument as if their interlocutor was running for the presidency, So your racism is OK since you aren't running for president? What a "suzzball" [sic] Quote
j_b Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Nobody's racism is ok, but especially not for someone running to be president. Quote
j_b Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 (edited) a scuzball is a scumball who pretends to be otherwise by emitting lots of diversionary smoke in my dictionary. Edited December 23, 2011 by j_b Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 Nobody's racism is ok, Excellent - acknowledging your problem is the first step. Quote
j_b Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 My problem viz racism is minor compared to Paul's and yours. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 My problem viz racism Yes. Focus on that, j_bot. Quote
j_b Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 as if the issue was my minor hang ups when we are discussing Ron Paul's decades long history of condoning (at best) discrimination against ethnic minorities. Quote
j_b Posted December 23, 2011 Posted December 23, 2011 A direct-mail solicitation for Ron Paul's political and investment newsletters two decades ago warned of a "coming race war in our big cities" and of a "federal-homosexual cover-up" to play down the impact of AIDS. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/23/us-usa-campaign-paul-plots-idUSTRE7BM03320111223 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.