Sam Furley Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Look I porbably dont have the best grammer but i can read and i still aint seen where you answered my first question. When I get an answer, then we can talk. Till then, shit's just fucked up and bullshit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 This fuckin fucker is fucked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Clearly, reading isn't the same as understanding since my own question assumed that the answer to your 'who did you vote for?' was "hope and change" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 The standard for silly and irrelevant personal attacks thinks that correcting someone on grammar is petty? LOLZ Â Nice for you to join us again. Were you hanging out at Wall Street, or did your Mom lock you out of your internet account again? Â Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Clearly, reading isn't the same as understanding since my own question assumed that the answer to your 'who did you vote for?' was "hope and change" Â FOUR MORE YEARS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 more high school "humor" from douchebag Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Furley Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Well assumptions are like cooters, and yours smells like sourkraut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Now that we dispensed with the obligatory silly quips, can you tell us how voting for artful deceit would be similar to voting for blatant doubling down on what brought us where we are today? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlpineK Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 What's wrong with sauerkraut? Missing the Brat are you? Â [img:center]http://www.marions-kochbuch.com/food-pic/bratwurst-with-sauerkraut.jpg[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Furley Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Do you think I'm trying to trick you or something? Just answer the question, and let me do the responding. Don't pretend you can guess where I'm going with this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 dude, I have answered your question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Furley Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Could you point that out, or better yet, just use one word? Makes it easier on me - too much thinking otherwise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 ???? this is what I said: "my own question assumed that the answer to your 'who did you vote for?' was "hope and change" Â to which, you answered something about cooters and sauerkraut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Furley Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Apparently one word answers are difficult for you. In that event, I'm not sure you should go giving political advice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Now that we dispensed with the obligatory silly quips, can you tell us how voting for artful deceit would be similar to voting for blatant doubling down on what brought us where we are today? Â So you got "tricked" by Barry's "artful deceit". Is that it? Your defense, then, is that you are a feckless, gullible moron?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Furley Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Well, hear me out feller. I'll assume you voted for Barry. Â Last election time, you knew BO was the greatest thing going for this nation, you alerted us all to his worthiness as a presidential candidate (despite many warning you he'd be the worst thing possible for this country). Â We all know how that worked out. Obama is a fucking idiot and he is the worst thing possible for this country. Â So now with your excellent reputation for assessing political candidates, all of a sudden you expect us to give two fucks about your opinion? Â Correct me if I'm wrong in any of this, otherwise you should probably just STFU. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Apparently one word answers are difficult for you. In that event, I'm not sure you should go giving political advice. Â I am having trouble finding the logical link between your 2 sentences. Could you spell it out for me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivan Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 We all know how that worked out. Obama is a fucking idiot and he is the worst thing possible for this country. things would be BETTER if bible spice and grandpa had won in '08?   Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivan Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 I like little things hitting other little things. midget wrestling - so hot now! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Well, hear me out feller. I'll assume you voted for Barry.  Last election time, you knew BO was the greatest thing going for this nation, you alerted us all to his worthiness as a presidential candidate (despite many warning you he'd be the worst thing possible for this country).  You clearly haven't been paying attention to discussions on this board since before Obama's election.  We all know how that worked out. Obama is a fucking idiot and he is the worst thing possible for this country.  So campaigning on 'hope and change' and saying all the right things that progressives wanted to hear, then doing pretty much the exact opposite as soon as assuming the presidency is a sign of idiocy according to you? Sorry to disappoint but in the reality based world, people who successfully deceive huge numbers of people are far from being idiots. Unethical, yes, but not idiots.  So now with your excellent reputation for assessing political candidates, all of a sudden you expect us to give two fucks about your opinion? Correct me if I'm wrong in any of this, otherwise you should probably just STFU.  You are in fact wrong on all counts. The least of which is that voting for McCain would have been better.  So, will you answer my question now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam Furley Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 We all know how that worked out. Obama is a fucking idiot and he is the worst thing possible for this country. things would be BETTER if bible spice and grandpa had won in '08?   99% of you libtards LOVED BO when he was running, and touted his programs. If it wasn't for that, then you might have a point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 We all know how that worked out. Obama is a fucking idiot and he is the worst thing possible for this country. things would be BETTER if bible spice and grandpa had won in '08?   Who's "McSame" now?   Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Now that we dispensed with the obligatory silly quips, can you tell us how voting for artful deceit would be similar to voting for blatant doubling down on what brought us where we are today? Â So you got "tricked" by Barry's "artful deceit". Is that it? Your defense, then, is that you are a feckless, gullible moron?! Â I personally didn't get tricked but many people did and being tricked by 'artful deceit' isn't a sign of gullibility or of being a moron. In turn, being tricked by blatant deceit and blatant stupidity is gullible and moronic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 Now that we dispensed with the obligatory silly quips, can you tell us how voting for artful deceit would be similar to voting for blatant doubling down on what brought us where we are today? Â So you got "tricked" by Barry's "artful deceit". Is that it? Your defense, then, is that you are a feckless, gullible moron?! Â I personally didn't get tricked but many people did and being tricked by 'artful deceit' isn't a sign of gullibility or of being a moron. In turn, being tricked by blatant deceit and blatant stupidity is gullible and moronic. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted October 12, 2011 Share Posted October 12, 2011 We all know how that worked out. Obama is a fucking idiot and he is the worst thing possible for this country. things would be BETTER if bible spice and grandpa had won in '08?   99% of you libtards LOVED BO when he was running, and touted his programs. If it wasn't for that, then you might have a point.  ???  Liberals did love Obama the candidate because he was saying almost all the right things. Would you expect liberals not to love a pres candidate who claims he'll fight for what they want? how does it mean that McCain, who said all the things liberals didn't want and joined GOP obstructionism during the last 3 years, would have been better? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.