Jump to content

She's So...


ZimZam

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

"In June, she kicked off her presidential campaign in Waterloo, Iowa, calling it the home of American actor John Wayne. The town was actually home for a time to serial killer John Wayne Gacy."

 

That's kind of a scary mistake...can't wait to see what kind of cultural faux pas happen when she visits over countries. :|

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why torture the man? I would say that most of us guys would do Bachman, some would do Palin, but most would not do Perry or Obama. Not that there is anything wrong with it....

 

If you made me hold my nose and choose between the 2, I'd go Obama. Nah. I'd write in a Disney character, can't go for big goverment dudes like Bush and Obama or right wing Christians who want to dictate where my (consenting and private) penis goes.

 

Is that a better choice to you Matt? I truthfully answered the question, now please answer mine. Would you rather have a horrible car wreck or fall into a vat of acid? Please answer the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill,

 

I think you might want to get back to that Sooty Grouse barbeque. You are not making sense.

 

You'd rather do Bachman than Palin, OK. Whatever. But train wreck or vat of acid? I think we are doing all of the above but that doesn't answer any question about what your vision for this country might be. It is hard to say what the next election will bring but Bachman vs. Obama is not altogether unlikely. Both suck will not be on the ballot.

 

Sign me up for a drumstick and thigh, though. I'll have the "wild greens" and the potatos au gratin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't understand? Not making sense? Well, short version is that I'll be dining with you Matt, but in my vision, a Bachman - Palin combo for desert would be less welcome than rectal cancer. It doesn't ignore the fact that I feel that the largest issue facing our country is our huge deficit, started by Bush and exacerbated by Obama. The Bush/Obama tax cuts for the rich would most likely continue and be the Bush/Obama/Bachman cuts for the rich. It would only be my deepest hope that we could balance the budget whomever takes office.

 

I can't complain over some of the Obama issues. He has increased the CAFE standards, the MPG vehicles need, a good thing and a serious issue which will ultimately strengthen out country, and done some good here and there. Yet it is still hard to see the deficit continue to grow as if unstoppable, and our country's future go into hock as if it means nothing: it is our largest and most important issue IMO. There are trade offs either way no doubt. I can understand anyone who would lobby for either choice. So with that, you are asking if I'd prefer to be in a car wreck or fall into a vat of acid.

 

Neither.

 

Clinton wasn't perfect, far from it, big character flaws, but he was organized to face and tackle the big issues. Same with Harry Truman. We need that prioritizing and organizing capability now in the presidential suite but I don't know who could bring it to the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...