kevbone Posted April 12, 2011 Posted April 12, 2011 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110323/ap_on_bi_ge/eu_germany_abandoning_nuclear_power "If we had the winds of Texas or the sun of California, the task here would be even easier," said Felix Matthes of Germany's renowned Institute for Applied Ecology. "Given the great potential in the U.S., it would be feasible there in the long run too, even though it would necessitate huge infrastructure investments." Quote
ivan Posted April 12, 2011 Posted April 12, 2011 i'm suprised the germans didn't take the logical step of simply conquering poland and locating all their nuke plants there Quote
billcoe Posted April 12, 2011 Posted April 12, 2011 Turn to clean coal baby! Clean coal aka "Solid fuel" and Oil too!!! Woot! http://ec.europa.eu/energy/energy_policy/doc/factsheets/mix/mix_de_en.pdf Quote
sobo Posted April 13, 2011 Posted April 13, 2011 i'm suprised the germans didn't take the logical step of simply conquering poland and locating all their nuke plants there They already finished half the job. Now just to build the plants... Quote
billcoe Posted April 13, 2011 Posted April 13, 2011 They already finished half the job. Now just to build the plants... I think that I worked with some of those guys. Whats the story here? Steve McQueen just cruise though on a motorcycle? Quote
sobo Posted April 13, 2011 Posted April 13, 2011 Thought you were slobbering over guidebooks tonight, bill...??? Quote
kevbone Posted April 13, 2011 Author Posted April 13, 2011 Thought you were slobbering over guidebooks tonight, bill...??? Wow....what a quick edit. Quote
sobo Posted April 13, 2011 Posted April 13, 2011 Thought you were slobbering over guidebooks tonight, bill...??? Wow....what a quick edit. I find it curious with me having ~50% fewer posts than you, that you find my lightning editing speed surprising. Quote
Stefan Posted April 13, 2011 Posted April 13, 2011 The danger will still be there for Germany. Why? France will keep its nuclear energy...and then probably sell it to the Germans. Quote
rob Posted April 13, 2011 Posted April 13, 2011 Coal is more dangerous than nuclear. http://www.twincities.com/national/ci_17765813?source=rss&nclick_check=1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.