Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So recently in the news we have seen the Swine Flu which is and will be hyped just as much as the Bird Flu but, here is what I am wondering...when will we see the next GLOBAL disease epidemic? We haven't seen a mass death from an epidemic since the 1940's during the end of WWII. I may just have a glass getting bout empty view, but, I just don't have the faith that science can keep outpacing evolution. Millions died in the 1940's; what will happen next time after years of suppresion.

 

 

-just a thought....

 

parents got home from mexico yesterday, seem fine. :grlaf:

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Yeah, those viruses are strange entities. This strain of "swine" flu actually has material from human, pig, and bird species.

 

Considering that evolution is not goal-oriented in the sense of end design prior to change, it's amazing to the see the effects of natural selection and lateral gene transfer together in forming a new entity that persists. With viruses it is essential however that a host survives so that it can hijack its cells to manufacture more viruses.

 

Propagation without detection is enhanced by long incubation time and the existence of asymptomatic carriers. These characteristics could actually assist in that strain of virus to persist in time. For instance, if there were a virus that affected racial types more readily than others (there has been some anecdotal evidence that there is some limited immunity to the HIV virus in whites. And although a different disease vector, if you look at the case of malaria, the sickle cell deficiency yields some protection from that malady.). So, the virus could assist in allowing preferential selection of a particular phenotypic expression of a genotype. In other words, the virus can have the effect of producing a Nazi wet dream.

 

With the mutation speed of microbes, it's a wonder that they haven't outpaced their hosts, thus causing their extinction. Makes you wonder if possibly there is some "intelligence" operating at some level. Their "protean" nature actually appears, not as their demise, but as a survival mechanism as long as organic life, itself, persists. That signals that maybe these "simplistic" entities aren't necessarily primitive but rather highly efficient propagators and as such are a type of "higher" entity. Perhaps we will produce the vectors (space vehicles) that will serve to spread our viruses so that they can infect organic cellular life on other worlds. Maybe it's a matter of coevolution involving the emergence of intelligent life among eukaryotes, the eventual evolution of technology, and the recombinant genetic mechanism provided by the virus.

 

 

Posted

 

With the mutation speed of microbes, it's a wonder that they haven't outpaced their hosts, thus causing their extinction. Makes you wonder if possibly there is some "intelligence" operating at some level. Their "protean" nature actually appears, not as their demise, but as a survival mechanism as long as organic life, itself, persists. That signals that maybe these "simplistic" entities aren't necessarily primitive but rather highly efficient propagators and as such are a type of "higher" entity. Perhaps we will produce the vectors (space vehicles) that will serve to spread our viruses so that they can infect organic cellular life on other worlds. Maybe it's a matter of coevolution involving the emergence of intelligent life among eukaryotes, the eventual evolution of technology, and the recombinant genetic mechanism provided by the virus.

 

 

I'm submitting this paragraph:

http://www.unnecessaryquotes.com/

Posted
Their "protean" nature actually appears, not as their demise, but as a survival mechanism as long as organic life, itself, persists. That signals that maybe these "simplistic" entities aren't necessarily primitive but rather highly efficient propagators and as such are a type of "higher" entity.

 

 

Efficient propagation doesn't imply higher intelligence. Take the Palin family, for example.

Posted
So recently in the news we have seen the Swine Flu which is and will be hyped just as much as the Bird Flu but, here is what I am wondering...when will we see the next GLOBAL disease epidemic? We haven't seen a mass death from an epidemic since the 1940's during the end of WWII. I may just have a glass getting bout empty view, but, I just don't have the faith that science can keep outpacing evolution. Millions died in the 1940's; what will happen next time after years of suppresion.

 

 

-just a thought....

 

parents got home from mexico yesterday, seem fine. :grlaf:

 

Somewhere between 20 and fifty million died in the global pandemic that started near the end of world war I, and lasted until about 1920. The next pandemic (much smaller scale) wasn't until 1957. What is scary about this Mexico outbreak is that it has killed 20-40 year olds with healthy immune systems almost exclusively--just like the Spanish Flu outbreak--indicating that a cytokine storm may be killing its victims. Scary shit. I'm curious, though, why you would refer to the possibility of a pandemic as a "cleansing"?

Posted
The Mexican outbreak was clearly caused by a more vigorous vaccination program and the gun control laws of 1968 in that country.

 

I bet a healthy dose of federal deregulation would clear this little flu-problem up. Fucking libtards.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...