scott_harpell Posted June 3, 2008 Posted June 3, 2008 Lowest monthly casualty rate so far and oil production has hit 2.5 mil bbls/ day. The only thing that will let this war turn into "another Vietmam," is if you bitches elect Obama. If he pulls out now... 4000+ Americans have died for nothing. To pull out now can only be seen as one of two things; political maneuvering, or cowering to the pressure of countries like France, Russia and Italy who illegally profitted from illegal oil deals with Saddam. Have a nice day kids Quote
underworld Posted June 3, 2008 Posted June 3, 2008 this post should win over the hearts and minds of the cc.com sprayers!!! [if the cc.com sprayers had either hearts OR minds] Quote
scott_harpell Posted June 3, 2008 Author Posted June 3, 2008 I am sick of winning hearts and minds for now... Quote
gertlush Posted June 3, 2008 Posted June 3, 2008 Does the lowest casualty rate also hold true for Iraqi's? That could possibly be considered progress...all the other stat tells me is the yanks are staying in their bases. Quote
G-spotter Posted June 3, 2008 Posted June 3, 2008 Australian PM pulls all troops out of Iraq: "Every reason we were given for this war was a lie." >4000 dead Americans and hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis sacrificed to lies and greed. War crimes trial for GWB, 2009? Quote
kevbone Posted June 3, 2008 Posted June 3, 2008 The only thing that will let this war turn into "another Vietmam," Too late.....and we are not at war....we are occupying another country. Please get it right. Quote
ashw_justin Posted June 3, 2008 Posted June 3, 2008 Why do oil prices always seem to start rising soon before an election? Maybe if we could replace the fear of terrorists with the fear of $10/gal gasoline, then the voting public will remain scared enough to elect another arabophobic warlord! Quote
Off_White Posted June 3, 2008 Posted June 3, 2008 The only thing that will let this war turn into "another Vietmam," Too late.....and we are not at war....we are occupying another country. Please get it right. Thank you Kevbone! Exactly right. The war has been over for quite some time, it's the occupation that hasn't gone so smoothly. "Occupation" is an ugly word that folks, both in the administration and the citizenry in general, don't want to own up to, but its much more accurate than "Iraq War." Oh, and Scott? You are right too. 4000+ Americans have died for nothing. Quote
mattp Posted June 3, 2008 Posted June 3, 2008 It wasn't all for nought, Off. Lots of people made a lot of money off the deal and we now have a base in southern Iraq that I bet we don't plan to let go of any time soon even if we do "bring the boys home." Quote
scott_harpell Posted June 4, 2008 Author Posted June 4, 2008 Does the lowest casualty rate also hold true for Iraqi's? That could possibly be considered progress...all the other stat tells me is the yanks are staying in their bases. watch it pal. Quote
rob Posted June 4, 2008 Posted June 4, 2008 Does the lowest casualty rate also hold true for Iraqi's? That could possibly be considered progress...all the other stat tells me is the yanks are staying in their bases. watch it pal. How can he argue with that? How threatening. I'd sure be intimidated. Quote
scott_harpell Posted June 4, 2008 Author Posted June 4, 2008 The only thing that will let this war turn into "another Vietmam," Too late.....and we are not at war....we are occupying another country. Please get it right. right... just as we did in Germany after outsing another genocidal dictator who invaded his neighbor. Just as we did in Japan. We are still there now. I have it right you sad bunch of armchair quarterbacks. Watch the Iraquis fight the terrorists themselves; with pride. Maybe then you will understand that some real good came out of this. These people are willing to die to help us fight them and can't wait to get in on the action. I am sorry if that doesn't exactly meld with your preconcieved notions of what is going on over there. Quote
rob Posted June 4, 2008 Posted June 4, 2008 this post should win over the hearts and minds of the cc.com sprayers!!! [if the cc.com sprayers had either hearts OR minds] Hey -- aren't YOU a cc.com sprayer? Quote
scott_harpell Posted June 4, 2008 Author Posted June 4, 2008 Does the lowest casualty rate also hold true for Iraqi's? That could possibly be considered progress...all the other stat tells me is the yanks are staying in their bases. watch it pal. How can he argue with that? How threatening. I'd sure be intimidated. I am not trying to intimidate. I just think you should have some fucking respect. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted June 4, 2008 Posted June 4, 2008 Does the lowest casualty rate also hold true for Iraqi's? That could possibly be considered progress...all the other stat tells me is the yanks are staying in their bases. watch it pal. How can he argue with that? How threatening. I'd sure be intimidated. I am not trying to intimidate. I just think you should have some fucking respect. you've been away from cc.com far too long if you've developed that fantasy Quote
rob Posted June 4, 2008 Posted June 4, 2008 (edited) Does the lowest casualty rate also hold true for Iraqi's? That could possibly be considered progress...all the other stat tells me is the yanks are staying in their bases. watch it pal. How can he argue with that? How threatening. I'd sure be intimidated. I am not trying to intimidate. I just think you should have some fucking respect. Yeah, OK asshole, because your original post had SO much respect, right? Edited June 4, 2008 by rob Quote
scott_harpell Posted June 4, 2008 Author Posted June 4, 2008 That is right... cc.commers only have respect for socialist Western Europeans and defame their heritage, country and their way of life at any opportunity. I remember. I would think his tounge would be tied up if he happened to come accross me and my co-workers. Doubt you would be running your suck about us never leaving the FOB ace... Quote
scott_harpell Posted June 4, 2008 Author Posted June 4, 2008 Does the lowest casualty rate also hold true for Iraqi's? That could possibly be considered progress...all the other stat tells me is the yanks are staying in their bases. watch it pal. How can he argue with that? How threatening. I'd sure be intimidated. I am not trying to intimidate. I just think you should have some fucking respect. Yeah, OK asshole, because your original post had SO much respect, right? how many of you have died while spraying socialist garbage on the internet? ...besides having a coronary eating pork rinds sitting at your cushy desk jobs all day. Quote
ZimZam Posted June 4, 2008 Posted June 4, 2008 Patriotic duty is commendable. Fighting along side the Iraqi forces I'm sure you see this often. The ARVN's had it too (well some did). In the end it did not matter. All this really accomplished was empowerment of Iran, waste billions of dollars, and God knows how lives. Oh and before you call me a left wing liberal nut job (and proud of it), I fought in a steaming jungle and in the end it wasn't worth it. Trust me. Quote
gertlush Posted June 4, 2008 Posted June 4, 2008 (edited) I remember. I would think his tounge would be tied up if he happened to come accross me and my co-workers. What? You couldn't take me yourself?? Physical threats + internet = lame Anyway the only time I'm going to come across you and your co-workers is next time I get a happy meal. Oh yeah, and here's a recent picture of me: Edited June 4, 2008 by gertlush Quote
scott_harpell Posted June 4, 2008 Author Posted June 4, 2008 I dont have to make threats. I am not making one now. I do know that your bravado and your sharp tongue is backed up by nothing more than what you can produce on your keyboard. I have chosen to back up my convictions with everything I have. What have you done with yours sir? You instead, defame those who risk life and limb by calling them cowards. You can come check out my leg and then call me a coward; right before I deploy. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted June 4, 2008 Posted June 4, 2008 I dont have to make threats. I am not making one now. I do know that your bravado and your sharp tongue is backed up by nothing more than what you can produce on your keyboard. I have chosen to back up my convictions with everything I have. What have you done with yours sir? You instead, defame those who risk life and limb by calling them cowards. You can come check out my leg and then call me a coward; right before I deploy. Scott: you yourself are a threat to these fucking losers. You have convictions and have acted on them. They don't and never will. Good luck, man! Quote
ashw_justin Posted June 4, 2008 Posted June 4, 2008 Please, it is not even possible to call the enlisted men and women sleeping in body armor (or not...) cowards. They didn't ship themselves to oilistan, our country's most powerful cowards did. And they can't ship themselves out either--it will take more powerful cowards to do that too. "Perhaps when the next great war comes, we may see that sight unprecedented in all history: a jingo with a bullet hole in him." Quote
Hugh Conway Posted June 4, 2008 Posted June 4, 2008 I am not trying to intimidate. I just think you should have some fucking respect. How much do you lead the women & children? Or are they stationary? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.