G-spotter Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Evolution of the Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawks Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 (edited) giddy up!  Did I see that horse turn into a cat? Micro buddy and a site totally to bash creation.  Come back in a decade or so if you learn how to make sense  The opening quote is a fricking lie "This small dog-sized animal is the oldest found horse"  Its a horse and they put in small dog-size to Impply it evolved. Like how they humped its spine and the only one with its head down. Come on are you guys actually this stupid. 0+0+=0 Edited December 21, 2007 by Seahawks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bug Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 [quote=Seahawks Well there a problem with that logic. Jesus taught about Adam and eve and creation. So if Jesus taught this then either 1. Its true or 2. He's a lier.  If he a lier then you better look somewhere else becuase it all crap then.  ‘But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female’ (Mark 10:6).  In these words of Jesus we find He teaches that Adam and Eve were created in ‘the beginning of the creation’ The world as you see it is either "1" or "2". Is that what Jesus taught? "Interpret my words "1" or "2". Nothing else will work. Oh, ignore all the changes in direction and interpretation between 1200 BC and late 2007 AD. Oh and one more thingy, after you have translated through 4 or 5 separate languages, don't worry about it. Bound to be right." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bug Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 g'night all. My kids are back from Mexico and I would rather spend time with them than with you. You all suck HC and I wouldn't have it any other way. Â Merry Christmas! ScienceMas! DorkMas! You name it. Just try to enjoy it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawks Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 [quote=Seahawks Well there a problem with that logic. Jesus taught about Adam and eve and creation. So if Jesus taught this then either 1. Its true or 2. He's a lier.  If he a lier then you better look somewhere else becuase it all crap then.  ‘But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female’ (Mark 10:6).  In these words of Jesus we find He teaches that Adam and Eve were created in ‘the beginning of the creation’ The world as you see it is either "1" or "2". Is that what Jesus taught? "Interpret my words "1" or "2". Nothing else will work. Oh, ignore all the changes in direction and interpretation between 1200 BC and late 2007 AD. Oh and one more thingy, after you have translated through 4 or 5 separate languages, don't worry about it. Bound to be right."  Ever hear of the dead sea scroles?? Read up. The mauscripts were not changed. I know a guy who actually studies the bible in greek and hebrew. Fricking smart guy. Yes it hard to translate some words from one language to another but the ideas are the same. To deny something becuase of translation would be eliminate some of the great writting of the world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawks Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 (edited) giddy up!  In modem decades, the tree of horse evolution has been refuted and abandoned, in professional circles at least. Consider this admission by Steven Stanley: "The horse ... the classic story of one genus fuming into another, … Now it's becoming apparent that there's an overlap of these genera, and that there were many species belonging to each one" (Bioscience, Dec. 1986). Mr. Walt Barnhart, in his master's thesis (1987) , catalogued this overlap in 21 different genera with data from the evolutionary literature. Dotted lines represent uncertainties in dating. Most individual categories are known only from their teeth. It is hard to see any evolutionary sequence here Edited December 21, 2007 by Seahawks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 those modem decades were a bitch. thank baby jesus for broadband. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hafilax Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Archeopteryx is a transitional form and it's even climbing related (in a way). It had wings and feathers but had more in common with dinosaurs and reptiles than birds. Â Here's the Wiki and a description and a general essay on transitional forms. Â Awaiting out of hand dismissal with no argument contained within. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 the growth of this bone clearly suggest evolution: Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Archeopteryx is a transitional form and it's even climbing related (in a way). It had wings and feathers but had more in common with dinosaurs and reptiles than birds. Â Here's the Wiki and a description and a general essay on transitional forms. Â Awaiting out of hand dismissal with no argument contained within. Â Arcateryx clearly makes an evolutionary garment. Too bad the price doesn't evolve downward while maintaining a high level of quality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hafilax Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 This is great. I'm learning more about evolution by the minute Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClimbingPanther Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 Arcateryx clearly makes an evolutionary garment. Too bad the price doesn't evolve downward while maintaining a high level of quality. Â silly porter, the price doesn't evolve because the garments are intelligently designed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawks Posted December 21, 2007 Share Posted December 21, 2007 (edited) Archeopteryx is a transitional form and it's even climbing related (in a way). It had wings and feathers but had more in common with dinosaurs and reptiles than birds. Â Here's the Wiki and a description and a general essay on transitional forms. Â Awaiting out of hand dismissal with no argument contained within. Â Birds are alleged to have evolved from the reptiles. Yet no one has ever found a single fossil showing a part-way wing and part-way forelimb, or a part-way feather. Archaeopteryx, "the oldest known bird," had teeth but so did other birds found in the fossil record that were unquestionably 100% birds. Archaeopteryx had claw-like appendages on the leading edges of its wings. These same appendages, however. are found in a living bird in South America, the Hoactzin, and he is 100% bird. Archaeopteryx had vertebrae extending out along the tail, but was no more a transitional form between reptile and bird than the bat is a link between bird and mammal. Archaeopteryx had fully developed wings and feathers. It flew. It was definitely a bird, as all paleontologists agree. Lecomte du Nouy, an evolutionist, has said, "in spite of the fact that it is undeniably related to the two classes of reptiles and birds (a relation which the anatomy and physiology of actually living specimens demonstrates), we are not even authorized to consider the exceptional case of the Archaeopteryx as a true link. By link, we mean a necessary stage of transition between classes such as reptiles and birds, or between smaller groups. An animal displaying characters belonging to two different groups cannot be treated as a true link as long as the intermediary stages have not been found, and as long as the mechanisms of transition remain "unknown."11 Marshall has stated, "The origin of birds is largely a matter of deduction. There is no fossil of the stages through which the remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved Edited December 22, 2007 by Seahawks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 he friends were silent. Neither cared to begin talking. Pierre continually glanced at Prince Andrew; Prince Andrew rubbed his forehead with his small hand. Â "Let us go and have supper," he said with a sigh, going to the door. Â They entered the elegant, newly decorated, and luxurious dining room. Everything from the table napkins to the silver, china, and glass bore that imprint of newness found in the households of the newly married. Halfway through supper Prince Andrew leaned his elbows on the table and, with a look of nervous agitation such as Pierre had never before seen on his face, began to talk- as one who has long had something on his mind and suddenly determines to speak out. Â "Never, never marry, my dear fellow! That's my advice: never marry till you can say to yourself that you have done all you are capable of, and until you have ceased to love the woman of your choice and have seen her plainly as she is, or else you will make a cruel and irrevocable mistake. Marry when you are old and good for nothing- or all that is good and noble in you will be lost. It will all be wasted on trifles. Yes! Yes! Yes! Don't look at me with such surprise. If you marry expecting anything from yourself in the future, you will feel at every step that for you all is ended, all is closed except the drawing room, where you will be ranged side by side with a court lackey and an idiot!... But what's the good?..." and he waved his arm. Â Pierre took off his spectacles, which made his face seem different and the good-natured expression still more apparent, and gazed at his friend in amazement. Â "My wife," continued Prince Andrew, "is an excellent woman, one of those rare women with whom a man's honor is safe; but, O God, what would I not give now to be unmarried! You are the first and only one to whom I mention this, because I like you." Â As he said this Prince Andrew was less than ever like that Bolkonski who had lolled in Anna Pavlovna's easy chairs and with half-closed eyes had uttered French phrases between his teeth. Every muscle of his thin face was now quivering with nervous excitement; his eyes, in which the fire of life had seemed extinguished, now flashed with brilliant light. It was evident that the more lifeless he seemed at ordinary times, the more impassioned he became in these moments of almost morbid irritation. Â "You don't understand why I say this," he continued, "but it is the whole story of life. You talk of Bonaparte and his career," said he (though Pierre had not mentioned Bonaparte), "but Bonaparte when he worked went step by step toward his goal. He was free, he had nothing but his aim to consider, and he reached it. But tie yourself up with a woman and, like a chained convict, you lose all freedom! And all you have of hope and strength merely weighs you down and torments you with regret. Drawing rooms, gossip, balls, vanity, and triviality- these are the enchanted circle I cannot escape from. I am now going to the war, the greatest war there ever was, and I know nothing and am fit for nothing. I am very amiable and have a caustic wit," continued Prince Andrew, "and at Anna Pavlovna's they listen to me. And that stupid set without whom my wife cannot exist, and those women... If you only knew what those society women are, and women in general! My father is right. Selfish, vain, stupid, trivial in everything- that's what women are when you see them in their true colors! When you meet them in society it seems as if there were something in them, but there's nothing, nothing, nothing! No, don't marry, my dear fellow; don't marry!" concluded Prince Andrew. Â "It seems funny to me," said Pierre, "that you, you should consider yourself incapable and your life a spoiled life. You have everything before you, everything. And you..." Â He did not finish his sentence, but his tone showed how highly he thought of his friend and how much he expected of him in the future. Â "How can he talk like that?" thought Pierre. He considered his friend a model of perfection because Prince Andrew possessed in the highest degree just the very qualities Pierre lacked, and which might be best described as strength of will. Pierre was always astonished at Prince Andrew's calm manner of treating everybody, his extraordinary memory, his extensive reading (he had read everything, knew everything, and had an opinion about everything), but above all at his capacity for work and study. And if Pierre was often struck by Andrew's lack of capacity for philosophical meditation (to which he himself was particularly addicted), he regarded even this not as a defect but as a sign of strength. Â Even in the best, most friendly and simplest relations of life, praise and commendation are essential, just as grease is necessary to wheels that they may run smoothly. Â "My part is played out," said Prince Andrew. "What's the use of talking about me? Let us talk about you," he added after a silence, smiling at his reassuring thoughts. Â That smile was immediately reflected on Pierre's face. Â "But what is there to say about me?" said Pierre, his face relaxing into a careless, merry smile. "What am I? An illegitimate son!" He suddenly blushed crimson, and it was plain that he had made a great effort to say this. "Without a name and without means... And it really..." But he did not say what "it really" was. "For the present I am free and am all right. Only I haven't the least idea what I am to do; I wanted to consult you seriously." Â Prince Andrew looked kindly at him, yet his glance- friendly and affectionate as it was- expressed a sense of his own superiority. Â "I am fond of you, especially as you are the one live man among our whole set. Yes, you're all right! Choose what you will; it's all the same. You'll be all right anywhere. But look here: give up visiting those Kuragins and leading that sort of life. It suits you so badly- all this debauchery, dissipation, and the rest of it!" Â "What would you have, my dear fellow?" answered Pierre, shrugging his shoulders. "Women, my dear fellow; women!" Â "I don't understand it," replied Prince Andrew. "Women who are comme il faut, that's a different matter; but the Kuragins' set of women, 'women and wine' I don't understand!" Â Pierre was staying at Prince Vasili Kuragin's and sharing the dissipated life of his son Anatole, the son whom they were planning to reform by marrying him to Prince Andrew's sister. Â "Do you know?" said Pierre, as if suddenly struck by a happy thought, "seriously, I have long been thinking of it.... Leading such a life I can't decide or think properly about anything. One's head aches, and one spends all one's money. He asked me for tonight, but I won't go." Â "You give me your word of honor not to go?" Â "On my honor!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
octopuswithafez Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 We've got to get this thread to 100 pages... pile on folks for the final push Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
olyclimber Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Prince Andrew was to leave next evening. The old prince, not altering his routine, retired as usual after dinner. The little princess was in her sister-in-law's room. Prince Andrew in a traveling coat without epaulettes had been packing with his valet in the rooms assigned to him. After inspecting the carriage himself and seeing the trunks put in, he ordered the horses to be harnessed. Only those things he always kept with him remained in his room; a small box, a large canteen fitted with silver plate, two Turkish pistols and a saber- a present from his father who had brought it from the siege of Ochakov. All these traveling effects of Prince Andrew's were in very good order: new, clean, and in cloth covers carefully tied with tapes. Â When starting on a journey or changing their mode of life, men capable of reflection are generally in a serious frame of mind. At such moments one reviews the past and plans for the future. Prince Andrew's face looked very thoughtful and tender. With his hands behind him he paced briskly from corner to corner of the room, looking straight before him and thoughtfully shaking his head. Did he fear going to the war, or was he sad at leaving his wife?- perhaps both, but evidently he did not wish to be seen in that mood, for hearing footsteps in the passage he hurriedly unclasped his hands, stopped at a table as if tying the cover of the small box, and assumed his usual tranquil and impenetrable expression. It was the heavy tread of Princess Mary that he heard. Â "I hear you have given orders to harness," she cried, panting (she had apparently been running), "and I did so wish to have another talk with you alone! God knows how long we may again be parted. You are not angry with me for coming? You have changed so, Andrusha," she added, as if to explain such a question. Â She smiled as she uttered his pet name, "Andrusha." It was obviously strange to her to think that this stern handsome man should be Andrusha- the slender mischievous boy who had been her playfellow in childhood. Â "And where is Lise?" he asked, answering her question only by a smile. Â "She was so tired that she has fallen asleep on the sofa in my room. Oh, Andrew! What a treasure of a wife you have," said she, sitting down on the sofa, facing her brother. "She is quite a child: such a dear, merry child. I have grown so fond of her." Â Prince Andrew was silent, but the princess noticed the ironical and contemptuous look that showed itself on his face. Â "One must be indulgent to little weaknesses; who is free from them, Andrew? Don't forget that she has grown up and been educated in society, and so her position now is not a rosy one. We should enter into everyone's situation. Tout comprendre, c'est tout pardonner.* Think it must be for her, poor thing, after what she has been used to, to be parted from her husband and be left alone the country, in her condition! It's very hard." Â *To understand all is to forgive all. Â Prince Andrew smiled as he looked at his sister, as we smile at those we think we thoroughly understand. Â "You live in the country and don't think the life terrible," he replied. Â "I... that's different. Why speak of me? I don't want any other life, and can't, for I know no other. But think, Andrew: for a young society woman to be buried in the country during the best years of her life, all alone- for Papa is always busy, and I... well, you know what poor resources I have for entertaining a woman used to the best society. There is only Mademoiselle Bourienne...." Â "I don't like your Mademoiselle Bourienne at all," said Prince Andrew. Â "No? She is very nice and kind and, above all, she's much to be pitied. She has no one, no one. To tell the truth, I don't need her, and she's even in my way. You know I always was a savage, and now am even more so. I like being alone.... Father likes her very much. She and Michael Ivanovich are the two people to whom he is always gentle and kind, because he has been a benefactor to them both. As Sterne says: 'We don't love people so much for the good they have done us, as for the good we have done them.' Father took her when she was homeless after losing her own father. She is very good-natured, and my father likes her way of reading. She reads to him in the evenings and reads splendidly." Â "To be quite frank, Mary, I expect Father's character sometimes makes things trying for you, doesn't it?" Prince Andrew asked suddenly. Â Princess Mary was first surprised and then aghast at this question. Â "For me? For me?... Trying for me!..." said she. Â "He always was rather harsh; and now I should think he's getting very trying," said Prince Andrew, apparently speaking lightly of their father in order to puzzle or test his sister. Â "You are good in every way, Andrew, but you have a kind of intellectual pride," said the princess, following the train of her own thoughts rather than the trend of the conversation- "and that's a great sin. How can one judge Father? But even if one might, what feeling except veneration could such a man as my father evoke? And I am so contented and happy with him. I only wish you were all as happy as I am." Â Her brother shook his head incredulously. Â "The only thing that is hard for me... I will tell you the truth, Andrew... is Father's way of treating religious subjects. I don't understand how a man of his immense intellect can fail to see what is as clear as day, and can go so far astray. That is the only thing that makes me unhappy. But even in this I can see lately a shade of improvement. His satire has been less bitter of late, and there was a monk he received and had a long talk with." Â "Ah! my dear, I am afraid you and your monk are wasting your powder," said Prince Andrew banteringly yet tenderly. Â "Ah! mon ami, I only pray, and hope that God will hear me. Andrew..." she said timidly after a moment's silence, "I have a great favor to ask of you." Â "What is it, dear?" Â "No- promise that you will not refuse! It will give you no trouble and is nothing unworthy of you, but it will comfort me. Promise, Andrusha!..." said she, putting her hand in her reticule but not yet taking out what she was holding inside it, as if what she held were the subject of her request and must not be shown before the request was granted. Â She looked timidly at her brother. Â "Even if it were a great deal of trouble..." answered Prince Andrew, as if guessing what it was about. Â "Think what you please! I know you are just like Father. Think as you please, but do this for my sake! Please do! Father's father, our grandfather, wore it in all his wars." (She still did not take out what she was holding in her reticule.) "So you promise?" Â "Of course. What is it?" Â "Andrew, I bless you with this icon and you must promise me you will never take it off. Do you promise?" Â "If it does not weigh a hundredweight and won't break my neck... To please you..." said Prince Andrew. But immediately, noticing the pained expression his joke had brought to his sister's face, he repented and added: "I am glad; really, dear, I am very glad." Â "Against your will He will save and have mercy on you and bring you to Himself, for in Him alone is truth and peace," said she in a voice trembling with emotion, solemnly holding up in both hands before her brother a small, oval, antique, dark-faced icon of the Saviour in a gold setting, on a finely wrought silver chain. Â She crossed herself, kissed the icon, and handed it to Andrew. Â "Please, Andrew, for my sake!..." Â Rays of gentle light shone from her large, timid eyes. Those eyes lit up the whole of her thin, sickly face and made it beautiful. Her brother would have taken the icon, but she stopped him. Andrew understood, crossed himself and kissed the icon. There was a look of tenderness, for he was touched, but also a gleam of irony on his face. Â "Thank you, my dear." She kissed him on the forehead and sat down again on the sofa. They were silent for a while. Â "As I was saying to you, Andrew, be kind and generous as you always used to be. Don't judge Lise harshly," she began. "She is so sweet, so good-natured, and her position now is a very hard one." Â "I do not think I have complained of my wife to you, Masha, or blamed her. Why do you say all this to me?" Â Red patches appeared on Princess Mary's face and she was silent as if she felt guilty. Â "I have said nothing to you, but you have already been talked to. And I am sorry for that," he went on. Â The patches grew deeper on her forehead, neck, and cheeks. She tried to say something but could not. Her brother had guessed right: the little princess had been crying after dinner and had spoken of her forebodings about her confinement, and how she dreaded it, and had complained of her fate, her father-in-law, and her husband. After crying she had fallen asleep. Prince Andrew felt sorry for his sister. Â "Know this, Masha: I can't reproach, have not reproached, and never shall reproach my wife with anything, and I cannot reproach myself with anything in regard to her; and that always will be so in whatever circumstances I may be placed. But if you want to know the truth... if you want to know whether I am happy? No! Is she happy? No! But why this is so I don't know..." Â As he said this he rose, went to his sister, and, stooping, kissed her forehead. His fine eyes lit up with a thoughtful, kindly, and unaccustomed brightness, but he was looking not at his sister but over her head toward the darkness of the open doorway. Â "Let us go to her, I must say good-by. Or- go and wake and I'll come in a moment. Petrushka!" he called to his valet: "Come here, take these away. Put this on the seat and this to the right." Â Princess Mary rose and moved to the door, then stopped and said: "Andrew, if you had faith you would have turned to God and asked Him to give you the love you do not feel, and your prayer would have been answered." Â "Well, may be!" said Prince Andrew. "Go, Masha; I'll come immediately." Â On the way to his sister's room, in the passage which connected one wing with the other, Prince Andrew met Mademoiselle Bourienne smiling sweetly. It was the third time that day that, with an ecstatic and artless smile, she had met him in secluded passages. Â "Oh! I thought you were in your room," she said, for some reason blushing and dropping her eyes. Â Prince Andrew looked sternly at her and an expression of anger suddenly came over his face. He said nothing to her but looked at her forehead and hair, without looking at her eyes, with such contempt that the Frenchwoman blushed and went away without a word. When he reached his sister's room his wife was already awake and her merry voice, hurrying one word after another, came through the open door. She was speaking as usual in French, and as if after long self-restraint she wished to make up for lost time. Â "No, but imagine the old Countess Zubova, with false curls and her mouth full of false teeth, as if she were trying to cheat old age.... Ha, ha, ha! Mary!" Â This very sentence about Countess Zubova and this same laugh Prince Andrew had already heard from his wife in the presence of others some five times. He entered the room softly. The little princess, plump and rosy, was sitting in an easy chair with her work in her hands, talking incessantly, repeating Petersburg reminiscences and even phrases. Prince Andrew came up, stroked her hair, and asked if she felt rested after their journey. She answered him and continued her chatter. Â The coach with six horses was waiting at the porch. It was an autumn night, so dark that the coachman could not see the carriage pole. Servants with lanterns were bustling about in the porch. The immense house was brilliant with lights shining through its lofty windows. The domestic serfs were crowding in the hall, waiting to bid good-by to the young prince. The members of the household were all gathered in the reception hall: Michael Ivanovich, Mademoiselle Bourienne, Princess Mary, and the little princess. Prince Andrew had been called to his father's study as the latter wished to say good-by to him alone. All were waiting for them to come out. Â When Prince Andrew entered the study the old man in his old-age spectacles and white dressing gown, in which he received no one but his son, sat at the table writing. He glanced round. Â "Going?" And he went on writing. Â "I've come to say good-by." Â "Kiss me here," and he touched his cheek: "Thanks, thanks!" Â "What do you thank me for?" Â "For not dilly-dallying and not hanging to a woman's apron strings. The Service before everything. Thanks, thanks!" And he went on writing, so that his quill spluttered and squeaked. "If you have anything to say, say it. These two things can be done together," he added. Â "About my wife... I am ashamed as it is to leave her on your hands..." Â "Why talk nonsense? Say what you want." Â "When her confinement is due, send to Moscow for an accoucheur.... Let him be here...." Â The old prince stopped writing and, as if not understanding, fixed his stern eyes on his son. Â "I know that no one can help if nature does not do her work," said Prince Andrew, evidently confused. "I know that out of a million cases only one goes wrong, but it is her fancy and mine. They have been telling her things. She has had a dream and is frightened." Â "Hm... Hm..." muttered the old prince to himself, finishing what he was writing. "I'll do it." Â He signed with a flourish and suddenly turning to his son began to laugh. Â "It's a bad business, eh?" Â "What is bad, Father?" Â "The wife!" said the old prince, briefly and significantly. Â "I don't understand!" said Prince Andrew. Â "No, it can't be helped, lad," said the prince. "They're all like that; one can't unmarry. Don't be afraid; I won't tell anyone, but you know it yourself." Â He seized his son by the hand with small bony fingers, shook it, looked straight into his son's face with keen eyes which seemed to see through him, and again laughed his frigid laugh. Â The son sighed, thus admitting that his father had understood him. The old man continued to fold and seal his letter, snatching up and throwing down the wax, the seal, and the paper, with his accustomed rapidity. Â "What's to be done? She's pretty! I will do everything. Make your mind easy," said he in abrupt sentences while sealing his letter. Â Andrew did not speak; he was both pleased and displeased that his father understood him. The old man got up and gave the letter to his son. Â "Listen!" said he; "don't worry about your wife: what can be done shall be. Now listen! Give this letter to Michael Ilarionovich.* I have written that he should make use of you in proper places and not keep you long as an adjutant: a bad position! Tell him I remember and like him. Write and tell me how he receives you. If he is all right- serve him. Nicholas Bolkonski's son need not serve under anyone if he is in disfavor. Now come here." Â *Kutuzov. Â He spoke so rapidly that he did not finish half his words, but his son was accustomed to understand him. He led him to the desk, raised the lid, drew out a drawer, and took out an exercise book filled with his bold, tall, close handwriting. Â "I shall probably die before you. So remember, these are my memoirs; hand them to the Emperor after my death. Now here is a Lombard bond and a letter; it is a premium for the man who writes a history of Suvorov's wars. Send it to the Academy. Here are some jottings for you to read when I am gone. You will find them useful." Â Andrew did not tell his father that he would no doubt live a long time yet. He felt that he must not say it. Â "I will do it all, Father," he said. Â "Well, now, good-by!" He gave his son his hand to kiss, and embraced him. "Remember this, Prince Andrew, if they kill you it will hurt me, your old father..." he paused unexpectedly, and then in a querulous voice suddenly shrieked: "but if I hear that you have not behaved like a son of Nicholas Bolkonski, I shall be ashamed!" Â "You need not have said that to me, Father," said the son with a smile. Â The old man was silent. Â "I also wanted to ask you," continued Prince Andrew, "if I'm killed and if I have a son, do not let him be taken away from you- as I said yesterday... let him grow up with you.... Please." Â "Not let the wife have him?" said the old man, and laughed. Â They stood silent, facing one another. The old man's sharp eyes were fixed straight on his son's. Something twitched in the lower part of the old prince's face. Â "We've said good-by. Go!" he suddenly shouted in a loud, angry voice, opening his door. Â "What is it? What?" asked both princesses when they saw for a moment at the door Prince Andrew and the figure of the old man in a white dressing gown, spectacled and wigless, shouting in an angry voice. Â Prince Andrew sighed and made no reply. Â "Well!" he said, turning to his wife. Â And this "Well!" sounded coldly ironic, as if he were saying,: "Now go through your performance." Â "Andrew, already!" said the little princess, turning pale and looking with dismay at her husband. Â He embraced her. She screamed and fell unconscious on his shoulder. Â He cautiously released the shoulder she leaned on, looked into her face, and carefully placed her in an easy chair. Â "Adieu, Mary," said he gently to his sister, taking her by the hand and kissing her, and then he left the room with rapid steps. Â The little princess lay in the armchair, Mademoiselle Bourienne chafing her temples. Princess Mary, supporting her sister-in-law, still looked with her beautiful eyes full of tears at the door through which Prince Andrew had gone and made the sign of the cross in his direction. From the study, like pistol shots, came the frequent sound of the old man angrily blowing his nose. Hardly had Prince Andrew gone when the study door opened quickly and the stern figure of the old man in the white dressing gown looked out. Â "Gone? That's all right!" said he; and looking angrily at the unconscious little princess, he shook his head reprovingly and slammed the door. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hafilax Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Lecomte du Nouy, an evolutionist, has said, "in spite of the fact that it is undeniably related to the two classes of reptiles and birds (a relation which the anatomy and physiology of actually living specimens demonstrates), we are not even authorized to consider the exceptional case of the Archaeopteryx as a true link. By link, we mean a necessary stage of transition between classes such as reptiles and birds, or between smaller groups. An animal displaying characters belonging to two different groups cannot be treated as a true link as long as the intermediary stages have not been found, and as long as the mechanisms of transition remain "unknown."11 Marshall has stated, "The origin of birds is largely a matter of deduction. There is no fossil of the stages through which the remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved That argument is really weak. So what if it's not a 'true link' (which is an incredibly narrow definition). This creature had undeniable reptilian features which the bat-bird strawman argument woefully over simplifies. This is strong evidence that it is very close to a 'true link' in my mind. A 'true link' requires a series of fossils leading up to and out of a splitting. The probability of discovering that is minuscule. Â At the very least you have to admit that this makes evolution plausible. It's not conclusive evidence but it is incredibly strong evidence. Even that quote from Lecomte du Nouy doesn't state that it isn't a transitional form but is more of an apologetic concession to creationists. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-spotter Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Evolution is a fact Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawks Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Lecomte du Nouy, an evolutionist, has said, "in spite of the fact that it is undeniably related to the two classes of reptiles and birds (a relation which the anatomy and physiology of actually living specimens demonstrates), we are not even authorized to consider the exceptional case of the Archaeopteryx as a true link. By link, we mean a necessary stage of transition between classes such as reptiles and birds, or between smaller groups. An animal displaying characters belonging to two different groups cannot be treated as a true link as long as the intermediary stages have not been found, and as long as the mechanisms of transition remain "unknown."11 Marshall has stated, "The origin of birds is largely a matter of deduction. There is no fossil of the stages through which the remarkable change from reptile to bird was achieved That argument is really weak. So what if it's not a 'true link' (which is an incredibly narrow definition). This creature had undeniable reptilian features which the bat-bird strawman argument woefully over simplifies. This is strong evidence that it is very close to a 'true link' in my mind. A 'true link' requires a series of fossils leading up to and out of a splitting. The probability of discovering that is minuscule. Â At the very least you have to admit that this makes evolution plausible. It's not conclusive evidence but it is incredibly strong evidence. Even that quote from Lecomte du Nouy doesn't state that it isn't a transitional form but is more of an apologetic concession to creationists. Â I hear what your saying but if evolution is true the fossil record should be teaming with tranitional fossils. Its not. and no concern by the evolutionist. They just march on and say this is the truth blindly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-spotter Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Â I hear what your saying but if evolution is true the fossil record should be teaming with tranitional fossils. Its not.. Â It is, despite you being so dumb. You can go to any museum and see'em. but you might be too dumb to be let inside. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawks Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Â I hear what your saying but if evolution is true the fossil record should be teaming with tranitional fossils. Its not.. Â It is, despite you being so dumb. You can go to any museum and see'em. but you might be too dumb to be let inside. Â I've answer the question to kevbone 5 pages back. No museum has transitional fossils. Man people here are dense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sobo Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Arcateryx clearly makes an evolutionary garment. Too bad the price doesn't evolve downward while maintaining a high level of quality.  silly porter, the price doesn't evolve because the garments are intelligently designed  Now that's fuckin' funny, and I don't care who ya are.  Jeezus H Christ, vertical hiker quit two days ago and this thread is still going strong? What is it, 39 freakin' pages now? This has surpassed the Fat Housecat thread in a week, and is rapidly closing in on the Nodder, Mt. Hood deaths, and Muir on Saturday threads! What hath Dog wrought? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlpineK Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Ya know it's quite a testimonial on how tolerant the mods are that we let an idiot like Seahawks continue to try and give the appearance of a human online. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minx Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 hey seahawks, the pope called he wants you to stfu. guess i'm gonna have to lock this thread if you don't quit posting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tvashtarkatena Posted December 22, 2007 Share Posted December 22, 2007 Back from ice climbing. I see I didn't miss much. This thread is amazingly brief when you've got Seahawks on Ignore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.