Jump to content

Helmets and UV


Geek_the_Greek

Recommended Posts

A buddy of mine recently asked how long I'd owned my helmet. "Seven years or so" I answered, and he said I should retire it, because of UV damage (that it would be seriously weakened by now).

Anyone else heard this? I'm kind of attached to my helmet at this point, and would prefer to keep it. Obviously, exactly when to retire a helmet for UV reasons must depend on how often you climb (in the sun?) with it on. Given that, any ideas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If you go by what OSHA say's, then you should replace your helmet after three years. I don't know what studies were done, but the claim is that UV rays will begin to break down the structure of the plastic, making it weaker and after three years of exposure it will no longer protect your mellon from simple impacts. That of course doesn't even take into account any previous impacts from rock fall or simply storing it at the bottom of your gear pile were the weight of everything on top of it can deform it making it weaker as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about stickers and the effects of adhesive on the plastic?

 

I have a Pezel Ecrin... pretty standard helmet. The packaging came with a lot of cautions, don't do this, don't do that... don't paint, don't sticker. I've seen plenty of folks out there with personalized helmets, and I'd kinda like to adorn mine (more for identification than vanity [big Grin] .)

 

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:

Originally posted by Toast:

How about stickers and the effects of adhesive on the plastic?

 

I have a Pezel Ecrin... pretty standard helmet. The packaging came with a lot of cautions, don't do this, don't do that... don't paint, don't sticker. I've seen plenty of folks out there with personalized helmets, and I'd kinda like to adorn mine (more for identification than vanity
[big Grin]
.)

 

Thoughts?

Doesn't petzl sell a "personalization" sticker kit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those UV and sticker degrading helmet things are pretty theoretical. If you retire your biner everytime you drop it 2 feet to the floor while racking up, you might want to retire helmet too. Hell, ALL your gear could be invisibly degraded and unsafe. Send it to me! I will dispose of it properly. [big Grin]

 

Note: Black Diamond makes special STICKER PACKS for their helmets. Either 1) stickers do not degrade helmets or 2) they use a special non-degrading glue thus justifying the $13 cost of the sticker pack.

 

I always wondered why there isnt a sticker in that pack that says " I am a fool with money to burn."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a new helmet every seven years sounds like an appropiate schedule-

It deninetly needs to be done at sometime approaching the decade mark-

have you ever seen someone put their fingers thru a nalgene bottle that has seen extended UV exposure? BRITTLE, and I'm sure a glass or plastic lid also has similar reactions to sunlight/use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had my helmet for more than 10 years now (and almost always wear it when roped climbing), but I figure I'm OK with it because the helmet's probably been out in the sun only about 300 days total (i.e. less than a year!) [big Grin]

 

edited to add: and NO, I've never seen anyone put their fingers through a Nalgene bottle.

 

edited again to add: and when I do retire my helmet, it might be fun to try dropping some huge rocks on it to see what happens! [Cool][big Drink]

 

[ 11-22-2002, 09:15 AM: Message edited by: chucK ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geek-

I don't know how often you go out climbing but Chuck points out what would (to me) seem a valid consideration: if you are worried about UV exposure it is not the duration of your ownership but the number of times you've been outside with the thing.

 

I know that some rope manufacturers suggest retiring ropes, even if they have been stored in the closet, after some rediculously short period of time like three years. So I guess they think exposure to oxygen degrades a rope but I can tell you I and most people I know do not retire an unused rope simply for "old age" until it is at least ten years old.

 

My twenty year old edelrid helmet still feels supple to me, but I have bought a new one because a yellow helmet with a chip out of the rim just doesn't present the right image.

 

[ 11-22-2002, 09:50 AM: Message edited by: mattp ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good answers, good answers....

 

Hmmm - the whole "how many days out" thing seems like a bit of a drag to calculate once you go back a couple of years. I guess I could dig up all my guidebooks, read through all my ticked route notes, try to figure out which ones I did more than once, and get some sort of approximate value of days climbed, and sun exposure.

 

Pffft. Whatever. I guess I'll wait until the next time I'm at a gear shop, see a nice helmet, and feel like dropping some cashish. Then I bring out the flame paint and stickers again!

 

As an aside, I've always figured water-based acrylic paints to be ok on plastic. (Anyone else have old Games Workshop miniature paints lying around??)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:

Originally posted by mattp:

I know that some rope manufacturers suggest retiring ropes, even if they have been stored in the closet, after some rediculously short period of time like three years. So I guess they think exposure to oxygen degrades a rope but I can tell you I and most people I know do not retire an unused rope simply for "old age" until it is at least ten years old.

Take a look at these test for rope aging questions:

http://filebox.vt.edu/users/raedward/cisdetrop.html

 

Strength loss is well correlatable to Rope use, not age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:

Originally posted by cj001f:

Take a look at these test for rope aging questions:

 

Strength loss is well correlatable to Rope use, not age.

From the "7/16" diameter, and the National Speleological Society references, I am thinking they are talking about static lines.

 

The issue with aging in a climbing rope is not loss of strength, but loss of elasticity, ie shock absorption. [Eek!] At least that's what I always understood. Too lazy to find something to back it up right now. [sleep] ALthough they say it themslves now that I look closer, "The energy absorption’s of the used ropes were, however, less than that of the standard by as much as two thirds [snip]."

 

[ 11-22-2002, 06:11 PM: Message edited by: snoboy ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

true story (about ropes, not helmets): back in the mid seventies, Todd Rentschler, of Eugene, OR, designed a seat harness for the members of a team attempting the second ascent of the French Ridge on Mt. Huntington. He and Ed Newville (another member of that team) decided to test the harness before climbing in it. They tested it by tying the harness around a block of basalt that they estimated weighed between 100 and 150lbs, and dropping it 25 feet from the Crooked River bridge on US 97, on a "semi-retired" 11mm climbing rope. (a factor #1 fall). The rope broke. Over the years, I've cracked a dozen or so nalgene bottles, even after covering them with duct tape. I don't know if the degradation is due to UV exposure, or some other factor, but age-related degradation seems to be real. CYA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...