Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
OK, but is this a problem somehow?

Not if you like homogenized processed spoonfed "experiences" - and most of the world does, including "individuals", based on spending preferences.

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

When I did my stint in D.C. I found numerous decent boulders along the Potomac that no one ever touched.

 

Everyone just went to the same places where everyone else went, like Carderock and Great Falls.

Posted
When I did my stint in D.C. I found numerous decent boulders along the Potomac that no one ever touched.

 

That's because they're called 'National Monuments'.

Posted

too much effort...climb in the gym m-f, then on the weekend head to the NRG or Seneca! thumbs_up.gif

 

actually, i kinda like the climbing at great falls, real technical, too short, but its good stuff for what it is...i suspect these days with a good pad these days, you wouldn't even rope up for most of it...

 

man, that shcist is SLICK...

Posted
think they'd shoot ya for pounding pins up the Washington Monument?

 

The Masons would take you to Area 51, put digital implants in the back of your hand, and make you ride a goat while they hypnotize you into becoming an Illuminati spy at the UN!

Posted
I would say that what it signifies is the popularity of climbing encouraging the appropriation and preservation of climbing resources for climbers.

 

We will definitely have to agree to disagree...

Posted

I think we'll see some good with some bad, Joseph. As various pressures on open spaces increase, there are increasing voices of those who would shut climbers out of certain climbing areas. A concentration of climber-visits and growing numbers in a specific location will tend to increase those conflicts at those particular locations, but a greater acceptance of the sport, however you define it, may also help us gain credibility and may also mean more climbers end up participating in recreational planning and management efforts.

Posted
I think we'll see some good with some bad, Joseph. As various pressures on open spaces increase, there are increasing voices of those who would shut climbers out of certain climbing areas. A concentration of climber-visits and growing numbers in a specific location will tend to increase those conflicts at those particular locations, but a greater acceptance of the sport, however you define it, may also help us gain credibility and may also mean more climbers end up participating in recreational planning and management efforts.

 

Especially when cool heads, balance, and reason prevail. Nicely put. thumbs_up.gif

Posted

I'm still holding out for the "Windsurfing" scenario - a complete collapse in the popularity of the sport. A way outside long shot at best. You guys need to eat way more twinkees to really do your part...

Posted (edited)

...and wash those meds down with folgers...you starbuck swillin' frape latte mocha soy breve drinkin wuss the_finger.gif

Edited by RuMR
Posted

Don't you two rapidly-obesifying oldsters have something better to do than trying to hold down the younger generation with your cynical taunts and cruel jibes? Macaroni macrame, perhaps? What's happening in the Community Room today? Jell-o social?

Posted
Don't you two rapidly-obesifying oldsters have something better to do than trying to hold down the younger generation with your cynical taunts and cruel jibes? Macaroni macrame, perhaps? What's happening in the Community Room today? Jell-o social?

nope

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...