Dave_Schuldt Posted June 13, 2005 Posted June 13, 2005 Bored? Do a Google search "Bushisms" http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blbushisms.htm What a dumb Quote
mtn_mouse Posted June 13, 2005 Posted June 13, 2005 "See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." —George W. Bush Quote
foraker Posted June 13, 2005 Posted June 13, 2005 "See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." —George W. Bush He's less eloquent about it, but he should at least give credit where credit is due: "'Repeat anything enough times loudly enough, no matter how untrue it is, and people will begin to believe it" J. Goebbels (sp?) Quote
Jim Posted June 13, 2005 Posted June 13, 2005 It's in our country's interests to find those who would do harm to us and get them out of harm's way." —George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005 Quote
Alpinfox Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 ...and its a doozy: Bush Explains Medicare Drug Bill -- Verbatim Quote Submitted on 2005-12-13 16:35:14 WOMAN IN AUDIENCE: 'I don't really understand. How is it the new plan going to fix the problem?' Verbatim response (PRESIDENT BUSH): 'Because the -- all which is on the table begins to address the big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculated, for example, is on the table. Whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those -- changing those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be -- or closer delivered to that has been promised. Does that make any sense to you? It's kind of muddled. Look, there's a series of things that cause the -- like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increase of wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggested that we calculate -- the benefits will rise based upon inflation, supposed to wage increases. There is a reform that would help solve the red if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefits grow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those -- if that growth is affected, it will help on the red.' Quote
foraker Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 Hey! You're supposed to continue living in fear of terrorists and not worry about domestic policy. Quote
Weekend_Climberz Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 So....I get the impression you don't like the guy Dave. Quote
Weekend_Climberz Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 "Who could have possibly envisioned an erection — an election in Iraq at this point in history?" —George W. Bush, at the white House, Washington, D.C., Jan. 10, 2005 What a dick!! Quote
Dr_Flash_Amazing Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 No wonder Kerry lost, with such stiff competition. Quote
Weekend_Climberz Posted February 10, 2006 Posted February 10, 2006 Probably the reason Laura always has that evil "I just got it sooooo hard" look on her face. Quote
chirp Posted February 11, 2006 Posted February 11, 2006 ...and its a doozy: Bush Explains Medicare Drug Bill -- Verbatim Quote Submitted on 2005-12-13 16:35:14 WOMAN IN AUDIENCE: 'I don't really understand. How is it the new plan going to fix the problem?' Verbatim response (PRESIDENT BUSH): 'Because the -- all which is on the table begins to address the big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculated, for example, is on the table. Whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those -- changing those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be -- or closer delivered to that has been promised. Does that make any sense to you? It's kind of muddled. Look, there's a series of things that cause the -- like, for example, benefits are calculated based upon the increase of wages, as opposed to the increase of prices. Some have suggested that we calculate -- the benefits will rise based upon inflation, supposed to wage increases. There is a reform that would help solve the red if that were put into effect. In other words, how fast benefits grow, how fast the promised benefits grow, if those -- if that growth is affected, it will help on the red.' LOL What a FUCKING ASSMUNCH, he needs to be like impeached or devomer or something. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.