johndavidjr Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 My 4-yr-old Makalus have disappeared (!) following my trip to Mt Stone area. I'd like suggestions for replacements. Meantime it looks like I'm stuck going to BC later this week with some crusty, 20-yr-old, resoled Asolo Yukons, & hoping like hell to avoid blisters & sole delamination. I need boots for garden-variety mountain climbs in summer NW etc....I'm sort-of interested in Garmont's high-toppped "approach" shoes, but they look a little light for glacier slogs and step-kicking. Trango S might be overkill (???) for my purposes. I'd appreciate any general or specific thoughts on boots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kioti Posted August 1, 2004 Share Posted August 1, 2004 The montrail lotus gtx looks pretty sweet. I don't know how well it would fit your foot, given that you were in Makalus prior to loosing them. I'll probably buy a pair of the montrails as soon as I sell my other boots (sz 45 scarpa freney pro, BARELY used (this shameless ad plug brought to you by midol.)) Try on some boots. If you havn't checked the garmonts out, do. see what fits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Posted August 2, 2004 Share Posted August 2, 2004 I've been using some Garmont Tower's for snow/choss/dirt/talus/mung/brush climbs and am pretty happy with them. Good summer boot. They kick steps and take crampons much better than standard approach shoes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
selkirk Posted August 2, 2004 Share Posted August 2, 2004 I've got a pair of LS Glaciers and they're a godsend. A few hotspots over the last year but never a blister, and took next to no break in time. They are bit beefy but very comfortable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceIceBaby Posted August 2, 2004 Share Posted August 2, 2004 I just got the Raichle all degree boots that fit my foot great at the store but I haven’t tried them outside yet so the jury still out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_Fisher Posted August 2, 2004 Share Posted August 2, 2004 (edited) I just used the Garmont Tower GTXs on a trip to Dorado Needle this weekend and am quite pleased. Relatively light and comfy on the trail and performed great on steep glacier stuff, both early AM styrofoam and late PM mashers. I did get blisters, but this is my first alpine trip this season and these are moderately stiff boots, so that's not exactly a surprise. Unless these boots blow out unexpectedly, my old La Sportiva K2s will now be sitting on the shelf of unused gear. Edit: On fit, I've got narrowish, low volume feet. These boots fit me great. If your feet aren't shaped all funny and skinny like mine, these boots might not be for you. Edited August 2, 2004 by J_Fisher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg_W Posted August 2, 2004 Share Posted August 2, 2004 I have used the Garmont Vetta for general hiking/approaches, strapped aluminum crampons onto them, and front-pointed in BD Sabertooths in them. They're great. They might be a little cool for extended trips on snow at higher elevations. Maybe not. I love mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johndavidjr Posted August 3, 2004 Author Share Posted August 3, 2004 okay so --I've been traipsing around in my old Yukons, and thinking they're maybe gonna cause blisters because the resoling job before I junked them changed their size and they've kinda dried up & gotten slightly weird (though there's probably plenty of life in them). My choices are a.) do nothing much but monkey with socks. b) buy insoles to take up heel space or c.) buy new boots. I may be afflicted with mere shoppingitis, but I'm thinking maybe these non-leathers, like Trangos and Garmont Vetta/Tower, might actually be possible to wear out-of-the-box without blisters. I'm going to do 4-5 days much on glaciers & rock in BC Selkirks. The Vettas aren't warm enough? The Trangos? The skin on my feet is only in somewhat toughened state at the moment. Am I crazy to think of bringing new boots on such a trip? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Posted August 3, 2004 Share Posted August 3, 2004 Yes. The fact that you ask anonimous screen names over the internet what boots to buy verifies you have significant chemical imbalances in your brain. You are indeed crazy. Welcome! I read a TR where DavidParker wore the Towers out of the box to do the long approach to Goode and climb a route with no blisters over a 2-3 day trip and a pack. I wore mine "out of the box" on a long day schwack & scramble with no problems either. I'd say go for it if they feel good after wearing them around the house for a few days. Can't be any worse than the risk you'd take wearing your old boots. I shelved some leather hunting boots for 2 years and almost died from bleeding blisters when I wore them again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceIceBaby Posted August 10, 2004 Share Posted August 10, 2004 So the Jury are in and the Raichle All Degree are Winner! I used them on Rainier yesterday and they were broken in after only 2 miles Pro: REALLY comfortable, Really LITE, Kicking steps was a comfortable task with them, Really warm (Gore-Tex) but fairly cool on the lower trail (stream crossing was not a problem even when I had my boot immersed calf high in the water Con: ALLOT of Seams!!! MUST seam seal the boots with Seam Grip (DO NOT USE SIL-NET) or Durability WILL be an issue (but hay…that is why these boots are SOOOOOOO comfortable) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Posted August 11, 2004 Share Posted August 11, 2004 I'm also in the market for some new boots - do you think the Rachiles are decent for some steep snow, a little ice on cascade routes. I hate blisters and my Scarpas are not cooperating lately. Also - anything that a cobbler might do to ease heel blisters? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iain Posted August 11, 2004 Share Posted August 11, 2004 The Garmont Towers are pretty sweet for N. Cascades stuff. I am not a fan of the GoreTex liner however. If I could get them in leather I would do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg_W Posted August 11, 2004 Share Posted August 11, 2004 I'm also in the market for some new boots - do you think the Rachiles are decent for some steep snow, a little ice on cascade routes. I hate blisters and my Scarpas are not cooperating lately. Also - anything that a cobbler might do to ease heel blisters? Jim - I'll give you another endorsement for the Garmont Vetta. I climbed the N.E. Couloir of Colchuck in them (1 an a half times, actually) this Spring; they take BD Sabertooths with the heel bail really well. I did some frontpointing in them and they worked great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
specialed Posted August 11, 2004 Share Posted August 11, 2004 Your best bet at mountain boots for summer Cascades shit is a pair of approach shoes nikwaxed and seam sealed. If you MUST have something beefier that Garmont hightop is a good boot so is the Sportiva S. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Posted August 11, 2004 Share Posted August 11, 2004 Hey Greg - Do the Garmonts have a lip on the front that supports a step-in crampon bail? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Posted August 11, 2004 Share Posted August 11, 2004 no, you need a "universal" toe bail, but the rear welt accomodates step ins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg_W Posted August 11, 2004 Share Posted August 11, 2004 no, you need a "universal" toe bail, but the rear welt accomodates step ins. What he said. Front toe-bails are death in the mountains anyway!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceIceBaby Posted August 11, 2004 Share Posted August 11, 2004 I'm also in the market for some new boots - do you think the Rachiles are decent for some steep snow, a little ice on cascade routes. I hate blisters and my Scarpas are not cooperating lately. they are fine for anything rock, snow, ice they have the back crampons bail so they are great for newmatic crampons I won’t go climbing WF vertical ice with them although they might do good for a pitch or two. Also - anything that a cobbler might do to ease heel blisters? This means your hill have too much room that it is slipping up and down try to lace them in one of these nifty ways and get an arch support to take from the volume of your feet if it still doesn’t work then it is time for a new boots Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David_Parker Posted August 11, 2004 Share Posted August 11, 2004 I read a TR where DavidParker wore the Towers out of the box to do the long approach to Goode and climb a route with no blisters over a 2-3 day trip and a pack. To set this straight....I wore Garmont light hikers "Verro" (or something like that) on Goode. The label said "these boots will take you further than yout think". They were right because I definitely pushed it using these. I should have used better boot sealer first. The Garmont Towers I used "out of the box" on Fury and I did get blisters over 4 days. They are NOT for wide feet. I'm still experimenting with footbeds with those boots. If they fit, these are excellent Cascade boots. They hike, rock climb, smear and take crampons well. Wayne and Colin both use them if that means anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IceIceBaby Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 Wayne and Colin both use them if that means anything. Oh Wow if they have it I get to gitme one of them boots Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K_Y_L_E Posted August 12, 2004 Share Posted August 12, 2004 "Wayne and Colin both use them if that means anything." Wayne Brady and Colin Mochrie? The guys from "Who's line is it anyway"??!!!?? Sweet. I am getting some. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johndavidjr Posted August 24, 2004 Author Share Posted August 24, 2004 Garmont Towers are extraordinary. What Trango S wishes it was. Now available for $150 at Mt. Gear. Raichles look similar, but the Raichle model mentioned above may not be as robust, and the brand's one-step up model, that is possibly most similar, is a tad heavier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.