lightD

If memory serves, the fuel tax based funding makes up around half of the money in the motorized winter recreation fund. Something north of $1MM I think. That fund is about double the non-motorized fund's size. From the 2008 WA Parks Winter Recreation Strategic Plan: The Sno-Park Program implemented in 1975 became the core of State Parks’ new Winter Recreation Program, now consisting of two administrative components, the snowmobile program and the non-motorized program, with separate funds supporting the cost of each program. The snowmobile program is funded from snowmobile registration fees and a percentage of the state gasoline tax. The non-motorized program is funded by the proceeds from Sno-Park parking permit fees. It is important to note for any proposed future changes in funding structures, that both programs were established by the Legislature to be financially self-supporting, using dedicated fund sources, without significant additional support from the Parks Commission. Changing the current funding model would require the concurrence of the Governor’s Office and the Legislature. The funding is calculated annually based on a formula that's included in the RCW somewhere. So its guaranteed funding and it basically doubles the funds available for snowmobile oriented access vs. the non-motorized program funding. Its not really a question higher demand from motorized vs. non-motorized users driving the funding. The gas tax claw-back makes a big difference. Glad to hear that the complaints seemingly made a difference.

You're right of course. I guess I was just being optimistic. In practice, collusion is incredibly tough to prove. You usually need a smoking gun (e.g. emails that show the price fixing taking place or a key witness like in the AMD case...). And you have to have a big enough issue, politically, for DOJ or SEC or a state AG to care. Maybe if the new management is cautious they won't attract attention and the real impact will ultimately be pretty limited. It might even work out OK for skiers. Having a few days at Xtal on my Summit Gold pass is sorta cool. But I think it still makes a lot of sense to pay attention to this. There could be other impacts that are less obvious, like more limited access for non-paying customers (skiers and climbers) OR fewer ski school options (all the third party schools got kicked out of Stevens - maybe Central and West are next??). All of those things probably help to raise the value of these properties since they can help revenue, increase development options or just avoid the appearance of third party meddling and CNL and Boyne might have similar incentives. We'll see. It just makes sense to keep an eye on this.

CNL owns Snoqualmie and Stevens now. Boyne manages Snoqualmie for them and also owns Crystal outright. Stevens will be managed by 'The Stevens Pass Mountain Resort Co' this year which is headed by a CNL guy according to the article - maybe they're just keeping the current staff in place since the season is starting imminently. We ought to keep an eye on this. With CNL and Boyne running the show for all available ski options within 2 hours of Seattle, I think there's already some incentive to collaborate (collude?) on pricing and services. Giving management of Stevens over to Boyne next year might be the easiest thing to do for CNL. Running a ski area is a tough business and nothing fixes your financial situation like exercising some pricing power. I'd pay special attention both to the pricing policies and public access. I think all 3 areas still run under a Special Use Permit from the USFS so the major asset they hold - access to great skiing terrain - is really a public asset.

Thanks for the stoke Dane. The Briggs photo is classic. TLT5s are next on my list to complete my 'lightweight' summer rig. It will come in at just over 11lbs for all skis, binders and boots. Far easier on the body and I hear the the TLT5s ski really well from some friends I trust. More on that soon I hope...

Get the boots right first. You can fix a lot of things in the backcountry. But is your boots suck and you're in pain for the whole tour, well its tough to fix that. Also, boots that fit right and match your goals and skill level are going to make whatever skis you end up with work a lot better. Start trying boots on now. See what fits. There are probably some good deals to be had this time of year.

You could ski tour near Mammoth and/or Bishop and still squeeze in some bouldering or sport climbing along with some 5K+ descents. You'll have some tough decisions to make. As long as the snow corns up....

Very nice guys. Holden is on my list - its a long list, we've got some amazing mountains 'round these parts.

Which day exactly? Was that Fri or Sat (looks like one of those two days judging by the weather). Glad you weren't in the firing line.

I believe the BARK guys, along with some friends of hers were responsible for finding her. The retrieval took place today I think. Not an easy operation with the rain, crappy snow and complex terrain back there. Sad news indeed. I didn't know her but it turns out a few of my friends did. I also figured out that I know a couple folks involved in the rescue. Sometimes when you meet someone new in the BC it feels a bit random but it can also feel like its the same small set of people sharing the experience, even if you haven't traded names yet. This whole episode is reinforcing that feeling for me. Be safe. See you all outside soon.

Nice! Riding that edge like Europa-cup regular. My kids really carve best when there's a lot of cocoa around. Keeps it real.

ilookeddown has good advice. I bathe my skins in a DWR treatment early in the year as well. It really helps delay gloppage. I also try to put the skin wax on before I have issues. If its a warm day and there's a mix of colder and warmer (wet on top) snow, then I'll add some skin wax before I head out.Its important not to let the skins get really soaked. Sometimes it makes sense to adjust your route a bit too, so that you're not going in and out of the shadows. Not always an option, but going from melting surfaces to slightly colder snow when your skins are a bit wet is usually what gets the gloppage going. I'll even try to dry my skins a bit in the sun if that's an option.

There's a public meeting this Thursday at 6:30P at Seattle's Franklin High to gather input on federal conservation and recreation policy issues. The motivation for the meeting is supposedly to support a '21st Century Conservation Policy' per a recent presidential directive. If you have the time and inclination you can go give Interior, the EPA and USDA (Forest Service's parent...) an earful about MRNP solo permits, NPS Base Jumping rules, washed out roads all over the Cascades, timber and fisheries conservation rules, the insane management and under-utilization of Yosemite campgrounds in the fall, or anything else. There's lots to choose from! I'm sure that many of us have something to add. If nothing else, you can see who else shows up and which groups are making a point to represent themselves. Climbers sometimes fall off that list, but maybe not this time. Here are the details - note that an RSVP seems to be required: http://www.discovernw.org/ago-signup.htm

Wow. I'm always floored by your vagabonding euro-venture TRs. Thanks for the motivation.

I'd cross post your request over on TAY: www.turns-all-year.com There are recent TRs from Adams and Hood that should help over on that site, as well as some info on road conditions and approach options. For my money, I think I'd start with Adams first. The S Spur/S Side is a great choice. The SW chutes are prime ski lines, though you have to be ready to traverse back to the TH and deal with some navigation issues. S Side of Mt Hood is pretty straightforward too, though there's more objective hazard right at the top (think tons of rime ice, then volcanic choss - no idea if the ice has come down yet). An early start will matter a bit more vs. Adams (though that's certainly a good call there too...). One last note - the weather has been pretty uncooperative lately. The forecast I just read has FLs at about 6k during the middle of the week. So keep a close eye on the forecast and try to be flexible. Partly sunny in Portland can still mean full conditions on top of Hood. If you end up in the weather, be ready to make your own call on snow stability and/or to deal with some serious navigation issues. Having a sport rack or mountain bike along can be a good equipment choice on days like that! Have a great ski!

As of yesterday it was beautiful - smooth buttery corn snow with a hint of colder/wintry proto corn above 9k. We had a really fun rippin' ski down to nearly 5.5k. The glacier was very filled in. In fact, we were able to head straight up from the drainage just East of RR grade to the summit of Sherman almost directly. The crevasse risk will probably go up somewhat in a few weeks time. But yesterday it was really minimal (though present). We also had very stable snow avy-wise because of a good freeze overnight. Things were frozen even at the TH and they didn't get loose until we were back below 5.5k on the way down, which was mid-afternoon. The new snow up high (above 8k-9k or so) is not totally consolidated below the very skiable solar crust, though it was getting transformed nicely. Also, the snow currently goes all the way to the TH and a little below. Its pretty dirty down low , but its nice to be able to slide almost all the way to the car. There should be plenty of snow for stashing a beer or two at the TH. In short, things are pretty prime right now if the weather helps out at all. Have a great trip.

Is there an issue here surrounding the need for an effective notification system for control work? This has come up before other places, and its always an issue when 20 and 410 are being opened. Its also been an issue in the Alpental valley. Maybe there ought to be some sort of clearinghouse - perhaps NWAC special bulletins or something that is or ought to be part of trip planning for an outing. It might not be bad to have place to go with the control zones mapped out and a daily update of what's expected - that's what they do at Roger's Pass and its a great way to not only get info on control work out but also other really practical safety and snow issue out. The crews could also post some sweet avy-porn of their better control shots to drive traffic. Could be fun.

Yeah, I demo'd the Manaslus and got some great reviews from Manaslu owners who really really liked the ski for soft snow. The weight is clearly an asset. But they just felt a lot lighter and less substantial, and were a little more work to ski. To be fair, I was not demoing the Manaslus in soft snow, which is where they're supposed to shine. But I figured that the Coombacks wouldn't do any worse in soft snow, and they certainly let you get away with a lot more while still feeling more substantial underfoot - probably a weight thing. The Manaslus certainly did hold an edge just fine. So I went Coomback and paid the weight penalty. But that's working pretty well so far. Hey - isn't REI having a sale this weekend? It never hurts to look right?? Good luck with your financial planning!

I picked up a pair of Coombacks a month ago that I use almost 100% for touring. They do a great job of staying on top of our sticky heavy snow. They're also surprisingly nimble. They get around quickly and can change lines easily. The rocker and maybe the elongated tip seem to help with that. The tip is just less locked in and stays nearer to the surface. Plus, 8.1lbs a pair (3.6kg?) seems pretty good for getting 100+ mm under foot. That's really what got me interested in the ski. BTW, the G3 Tonic skied close to the Coomback. It might be a good plan B for the right price. I think its just a touch heavier. Just one guy's POV. Hope it helps. Have a good trip out to the coast.

Greg Stump says Reggae and skiing are a natural fit. Good choice of music. Hope the soft snow returns soon. If not, I can tolerate a little sun .

I switched from Megarides to Methods early in the season last year and they were much roomier in the toe box. They seem higher volume than the Megarides overall. Of course, they're noticeably heavier than my Megarides were, but the fit was right on and they ski great.

I'll be in Whistler for a conference and was hoping to get out to one of the local crags on Monday or Tuesday afternoon. I'm most interested in shorter, moderate trad stuff - Smoke Bluffs comes to mind as an old favorite - but I'm open to any other ideas. I lead about 5.9 or low .10 these days (probably harder if its sport) and have been climbing rock, ice and alpine stuff recreationally for about 20 years. Kids slowed me down for a while but I'm starting to get out more this summer. Send a PM if you're interested and I'll be sure to check my messages while I'm in Whistler. Thanks!!

I second the vote for the Voile crampons. They were a good solution for my Reverends, which needed about a 100MM crampon. Leashes vs. Brakes - I went with brakes on my Dynafits after being locked into tele biners for the last 15 years or so. Just like BigSteve. I went with the brakes because I was thinking about avy safety, maybe because I hadn't had a choice before with the tele gear. The brakes are a bit sticky. I will try removing one of the springs. No problems with the bindings so far (got about 15 or 20 days on them now?)

Great info, thanks!

Nice TR! Was there water on the approach? Trying to figure out the logistics since I may be doing Exum next week. Thanks for the pics and the stoke.