KaskadskyjKozak

There was a huge rock avalanche off of Little T a few years back. I'm not sure how much that affected the visible profile.

Shit! You could give each of the $300+ million Americans $.67 each! Wow!!

Heck - the same indictment applies to most congressmen and other miscellaneous bureaucrats, not just the lobbyists. As long as we have humans in government, the problem of people attempting to use the medium of government to enrich or benefit themselves at the public expense will be with us. (Most) Everyone is pushing for their own interest.

"What? Who? Li'l ole me?" Give us a break. You know damn well that free-market fundamentalists have fought tooth-and-nail to dismantle any such rules and keep any new ones from being put into place. The explosion in risky financial instruments, increased volatility, more frequent crises are part and parcel of the "casino capitalism" that deregulation has helped to create. As usual, it's all down the memory hole--"oh hey look, Lehman stocks are up!" So is the solution here better rules that increase transparency, etc or nationalizing the entire financial marketplace? The answer is collectivization and five-year plans.

HEY PROLE CAN YOU SEE THIS VERY VISIBLE HAND?

from where? Uranus

pot. kettle. black.

some animals are more equal than others.

if the terrain is steeper it is a bit easier (steeper intermediate and black diamond runs). There the key is to get them to make sure they keep enough momentum going between turns. Teach them not to stop or even slow down too much but turn their skis downhill as soon as the start to slow, otherwise, they will get stuck.

I prefer my diet: 1) eat and drink whatever I want 2) burn calories through strenuous exercise

You could always make a few runs up Tiger Mountain.

Tragedy has struck one of the all-time best sellers!!!!!

LET'S ALL GET DRUNK AND RUN NAKED! LET'S ALL GET DRUNK AND RUN NAKED! LET'S ALL GET DRUNK AND RUN NAKED! AND LIE IN A GREAT BIG PILE!

Зто старая песня. Нам надоело.

Yes! my point is the fallacy of the "noble savage", and the idiocy of historical revisionism with a bias in the other direction.

Since western journalists aren't free to travel in Tibet and expressing anti-China sentiment is a crime it's rather difficult to get an accurate impression of the situation. China has shown it's true colors in it's reaction, expelling foreign tourists & journalists, censoring newscasts, blocking the internet (yahoo and google unavailable) and generally being its totalitarian self. yeah, but we waterboard terrorists and throw them in gitmo, so we have to STFU and say nothing. moral equivalency.

do you wish the native american well in their struggle against the capitalist oppressors? You mean those savages that were constantly at war with one another, altered the land (yes they did), took slaves, and loved to take war prizes like scalps, or maybe those down south who cut the hearts out of living victims or clubbed the backs of skulls for "fun"?

You can add "Raindawg" to that list. Trashcanlicker has made a very long list of friends on cc.com. :

yes, it does have a meaning.

once again, the hate-filled, left-wing circle jerk in full effect

Hyper-gag-reflex? I'm sure TTK has eaten more than one cock in his lifetime. Just look at his recent overtures towards RuMR. The dude loves

Dumbass. quick work FW! Usually we just see this: Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena Edited by Tvashtarkatena

the social engineers are all ready to fuck you over, Kevbone. You may think they're on your side, but they'll stab you in the back.

Um, yeah. And if we cut back as much as possible that would be what? 10%? 20% 30%? The population is still going up, and underdeveloped nations are using more energy than ever before. BTW, as a concerned person, I'm sure you're willing to eliminate all climbing trips and vacations, use no more gasoline-powered vehicles (bike or walk only), go to bed at sunset and rise with the sun, and have your electricity and gas at your home turned completely off, forever, right?

Certain social engineers *are* mandating just that. It is not possible for everyone to move close to their jobs, and those who can afford it the least will be fucked over by the higher gas prices and their commute. Moreover, higher gas prices means higher food costs and costs all around (e.g. clothes, cost to drive kids to soccer practice), which hit lower income folks harder. Take mass transit? Those costs are rising too.