KaskadskyjKozak

stagflation malaise

your guy should fix it, especially after all the whining your side did during GW's years in office. he hasn't, and you are silent. sorry, but your complaints now are just crocodile tears First of all, Obama is not "my guy" -- have I ever said he was? I'm certainly not a democrat. But, regarding being silent -- I can't speak for most democrats, but most liberals are furious at his domestic surveillance and drone programs. At least, I am, and so are most of the liberals I know. We certainly don't consider Obama to be "our guy" -- and I think most of his base is similarly disappointed in him. Just because you think things doesn't make them true. It amuses me that you and FW can't seem to have an honest critique of both presidents, but instead have to pick "sides." Defending Bush is a pretty hard sell, so I have to give you guys credit for sticking with it. Good luck! Randomly read political posts from Spray 6-8 years ago. Look at the volume and hysteria of the anti-Bush "outrage". You may find you posted some of those posts yourself. And now? For those same issues now that Barry is running the show. That's right, crickets. That's the point.

your guy should fix it, especially after all the whining your side did during GW's years in office. he hasn't, and you are silent. sorry, but your complaints now are just crocodile tears

that was the synopsis

POTD

But if he snorted coke at the Muir Hut he'd be cool.

[video:youtube]

I think we overuse the word "lie". That applies to Barry, Bush, and Bubba by their detractors one and all.

Mission Accomplished? :-)

interesting notion. i can certainly see someone having this opinion. did you ever see the need for censure during the bush presidency? And so the wheel turns. Ever since Nixon... investigate, revile, mock, impeach, bitch endlessly. Let's just fix what's broken as we can (the web site, people's canceled policies) and move on. If Barry-care ends up being a lot more expensive for voters, to the extent it is unacceptable, than they can vote a change in a few years and try to roll the shit back. Until then, give the "smart voters" what they asked for. :-)

Yes. Turns out they prefer a curious combination of Jimmy Carter (economic incompetence), Woodrow Wilson (arrogance and intoxication with power), and Richard Nixon (lies, paranoia). I mean, if you don't believe me, ask TTK. He said it himself!

Voters are smart. They knew what they would be getting. :-)

Dude, did you read any of my posts? at all? he should read about DDT, actually... LOL

This is going to get pretty crazy including murder plots. Murder plots? Hmmm

Nailed it. You could substitute any other name for "Monsanto", and the issue would still be the same. And, unfortunately, your misguided argument would still be the same. At least he has an argument. Posing endless questions is not an argument.

Time to stock up on Bailey's

Sounds like maybe you're a little too emotionally invested in this thing? What does that mean? Remember, I'm the one asking the questions around here. Fearing the worst. LOL. Chicken Little!!!

Linky

That part was pretty funny. And, after all, what girl wouldn't want that on her resume? Can you describe your responsibilities during your time at SeaWorld? Um, yes, I frolicked in a small tank with kidnapped Orcas. I tossed them fish when they performed prescribed tricks and, on occasion, I gave them supervised handjobs. Till-i-cum

Thank you OW!

Thank you OW

Yeah, I used a red when I was there a couple years ago...

Not "free" but "affordable" and guess who gets to decide who can 'afford' what?

Serious question: do you really believe that millions of people actually get their policies get cancelled when they actually get sick, for no reason other than they got sick? That seems quite improbable for dozens of reasons - not the least of which is that in addition to all of the state laws prohibiting rescission, the fact that doing so violates the terms of virtually every health insurance contract in existence and courts can and do enforce the terms of contracts, the contracts only permitted rescission in the case of deliberate and material fraud, virtually all rescission cases were subject to outside review...as of 1996 or 1997 the Health Portability and Accountability Act prohibited it at the Federal level for the rare cases that weren't covered by other statutes. If you meant people with pre-existing conditions who could not get insurance, people who failed to disclose pre-existing conditions and were subsequently denied coverage, people who let their insurance lapse, etc then it's plausible that the number could range into the millions, but it would be interesting to see the actual data. cue personal attack against JayB and his family in 3... 2... 1...

Geeez, and you wonder why people don't like you? The reason they gave is the provision under the ACA that, for all intents and purposes, eliminates the catastrophic plan my wife and I preferred. You never learn do you FW? A leopard does not change its spots.