billcoe

....and bought 4 of them yesterday......

I can only imaging that was said with a choking Ghhhrrgggg sound there? I think T must have actually been reading our stuff or something different, cause he's starting to agree with what we say and also make sense as well. :-)

This Billy Young version is pretty close. [video:youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TC7FPyq6Kj8 Speaking of black dudes who could crank from the 60's, can't forget Sam and Dave. Seen here live, but the recorded in studio version is better. 2 live versions of Hold on I'm comin' Short [video:youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fN4DHY_9gOs&feature=related Long [video:youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_juH0AHvwk Like the use of the horns. Here's the relativly talented Eric Burden taking a short at the same thing and coming short a bit. Into'ed by Otis Redding no less. [video:youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQknxjce3_Q&feature=related

"You left all the water running" is one of the greatest songs of all time. Somebody recorded this to U-tube at like 1/2 speed, it's horrible! [video:youtube] More Otis: [video:youtube] [video:youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdPB4YcdWuA

The NYT typically supports liberal and democrats for political office editorially speaking. However, this is your job since you were the one who claimed " blah blah blah no proof no links no information from JB that didn't originate inside of JB's head. You didn't even correctly read the posts you are arguing against so your arguments are not even on the point in discussion. Good luck in life with that attitude.

This is indeed the level of your discourse. YOU and other conservatives, supposedly "small government types", own this unprecedented economic fiasco fair and square. YOU supported all of Bush's "big" government policies, so don't come whining now about spendings. Which points to the propaganda you have been spewing about Obama. I never said Obama wanted to redistribute wealth, you and your pals did. Opportunist jackass who says everything and its opposite without missing a beat. If anyhting that was a counter-revolution and Reagan, the GE spokeperson, senile B-movie actor, certainly didn't have a hand in formulating the propaganda he spewed, conservative think-tanks did. Get off whatever you are smoking. I'm not sure PP has that quote right up there.

Huh? You talkin' conservative like the New York Times and the Detroit Free Press....it's pretty much a liberal media world once you get off AM radio my friend.

Precisely! So you agree with me that D'Souza is a liar when he claims that liberals say they want "big government". No, I do not agree with you at all. D'Sousa is spot on the money. Please see my second post re: Barak. He didn't ever SAY he was a big tax and spend liberal. Please see my second post re: Barak. He didn't ever once actually SAY he was a big tax and spend liberal, from his budget and spending proposals that is what he is though. Shall I post what he has proposed or have you been reading the news? BTW JB, IMO Tax and spend conservatives are even worse than Tax and spend liberals. I'm not picking a side here. Tax and spend is Tax and spend is tax and spend. At least the liberals are honest about it and stay the hell out of your personal life...generally. Shit, the tax and spend conservatives want to regulate your sex life, record your phone calls, be able to lock you up without a trial, and just generally stick their noses where it's not needed nor wanted. (Reagan, Bush and Bush for instance) Of course, Hoover tried keeping gov't small in 1929/1930 and we all know how that turned out......in the shoals of uncharted waters, the Captain has to make a choice, I'm glad still it's Barak and not McCain with the hand on the tiller. But what D'Sousa says is right on.

The date on that was Mar 3, 2008 btw.

I don't ever really recall anyone ever saying anything like that. No person has run under the "We need big government and more of it" platform have they? Check this out though: Link Message of Pessimism, Not Hope Illinois Democratic Sen. Barack Obama is very gloomy about America, and he's aligning himself with the liberal wing of the Democratic Party in hopes of coming to the nation's rescue. What is his proposal? Big-government planning, spending and taxing-exactly what the nation and the stock market don't want to hear. Plans to Expand Spending and Regulations Obama unveiled much of his economic strategy in Wisconsin last week: He wants to spend $150 billion on a green-energy plan. He wants to establish an infrastructure investment bank to the tune of $60 billion. He wants to expand health insurance by roughly $65 billion. He wants to "reopen" trade deals, which is another way of saying he wants to raise the barriers to free trade. He intends to regulate the profits for drug companies, health insurers and energy firms. He wants to establish a mortgage-interest tax credit. He wants to double the number of workers receiving the earned-income tax credit and triple the benefit for minimumwage workers. The Obama spend-o-meter is now up around $800 billion. And tax hikes on the rich won't pay for it. It's the middle class that will ultimately shoulder this fiscal burden in terms of higher taxes and lower growth. This isn't free enterprise. It's old-fashioned-liberal tax and spend and regulate. It's plain old big government. The only people who will benefit are the central planners in Washington. Second Coming of Jimmy Carter Obama would like voters to believe that he's the second coming of JFK. But with his unbelievable spending and new government agency proposals, he's looking more and more like Jimmy Carter. His is a "Grow the Government Bureaucracy Plan," and it's totally at odds with investment and business. Obama says he wants U.S. corporations to stop "shipping jobs overseas" and bring their cash back home. But if he really wanted U.S. companies to keep more of their profits in the states, he'd be calling for a reduction in the corporate tax rate. Why isn't he demanding an end to the double-taxation of corporate earnings? It's simple: He wants higher taxes, too. The Wall Street Journal's Steve Moore has done the math on Obama's tax plan. He says it will add up to a 39.6% personal income tax, a 52.2% combined income and payroll tax, a 28% capital-gains tax, a 39.6% dividends tax and a 55% estate tax. Not only is Obama the big-spending candidate, he's also the very-high-tax candidate. And what he wants to tax is capital. Doesn't Understand Capital Doesn't Obama understand the vital role of capital formation in creating businesses and jobs? Doesn't he understand that without capital, businesses can't expand their operations and hire more workers? Dan Henninger, writing in last Thursday's Wall Street Journal, notes that Obama's is a profoundly pessimistic message. "Strip away the new coat of paint from the Obama message, and what you find is not only familiar," writes Henninger. "It's a downer." Obama wants you to believe that America is in trouble, and that it can be cured only with a big lurch to the left. Take from the rich and give to the non-rich. Redistribute income and wealth. It's an age-old recipe for economic disaster. It completely ignores incentives for entrepreneurs, small family-owned businesses and investors. Harming Middle-Class Workers You can't have capitalism without capital. But Obama would penalize capital, be it capital from corporations or investors. This will only harm, and not advance, opportunities for middle-class workers. Obama believes he can use government, and not free markets, to drive the economy. But on taxes, trade and regulation, Obama's program is anti-growth. A President Obama would steer us in the social-market direction of Western Europe, which has produced only stagnant economies down through the years. It would be quite an irony. While newly emerging nations in Eastern Europe and Asia are lowering the tax penalties on capital-and reaping the economic rewards-Obama would raise them. Low-rate flat-tax plans are proliferating around the world. Yet Obama completely ignores this. American competitiveness would suffer enormously under Obama, as would job opportunities, productivity and real wages. Message of Pessimism Imitate the failures of Germany, Norway and Sweden? That's no way to run economic policy. I have so far been soft on Obama this election season. In many respects, he is a breath of fresh air. He's an attractive candidate with an appealing approach to politics. Obama is likable, and sometimes he gets it-such as when he opposed New York Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton's five-year rate freeze on mortgages. But his message is pessimism, not hope. And behind the charm and charisma is a big-government bureaucrat who would take us down the wrong economic road. Mr. Kudlow hosts CNBC's "Kudlow & Company" and is a nationally syndicated columnist.

pmi 9.7x60 = $60 at REI, just got 2 of them! Holy crap, nice find Ryan, they have the DMM boa lockers for $ 5.83/ea too. Edited to add: I ordered 2 more for a total of 4. Probably keep one, give one to Jim and ebay the other 2. I notice that people pay $100 for even a used rope on there. RyanB, never personally owned a PMI as I only buy whats on sale and these never have been that I've seen, but have known a couple of folks who owned PMI rope (don't know model) and they were happy. Time will tell. Next cheapest price online is here: Link Boulder mountaineering Dry Arete for $ 199.00. Says "OK, so maybe you aren't quite ready for a rope that's thinner than your pinkie - but you're sharp and every ounce counts when you're climbing on the edge. The lightweight Arete is a great compromise with performance that rivals any fat rope" I don't see any complaints online, and someone paying $200 for a rope would complain if it wasn't perfect I'd expect.

"Why Big Government Is Still the Problem By Dinesh D'Souza Is the era of big government really over? In a word, hardly. By Hoover fellow Dinesh D’Souza. The recent corporate scandals have given some people the impression that the big corporation, not big government, is the main threat facing the American people. Indeed liberal Democrats assert, with renewed confidence, “Big government is necessary to counter the influence of big business.” Yes, the corporate crooks should be punished, and it may take agents of the government, namely cops, to lead them off to jail. But the broader lesson that some people are drawing from these scandals is entirely wrong. Big business in general poses little danger to the freedom or welfare of Americans. The problem is still one of big government. However big the business, its power over the average American is quite limited. Consider the computer tycoon Michael Dell. What power does he have over me? He must buy expensive ads on TV and in magazines. He must convince me to call up and order a Dell computer and give the Dell people my credit card number. Now I would never do this unless I was convinced Dell’s computer was worth that money. In short, Mr. Dell must win my consent before he can get a single dollar out of me. But this is not true of big government. Let me illustrate with an example, which I have drawn from economist Walter Williams. The federal government has a program called Social Security that is intended to help me save for my retirement. What if I were to say: “I appreciate the gesture, folks, but no thanks. I don’t want to be part of this program. I am not going to pay any Social Security taxes, and I forgo any future claim on benefits. When I am old and cannot support myself, I will draw on my private savings, or rely on relatives and friends, or appeal to private charities. And if all of these measures fail, I will endure my fate.” How would the government respond to this? The government would, of course, respond by killing me. This may seem like paranoid speculation on my part, so let’s explore the hypothesis further. I refuse to pay Social Security taxes. The government sends me notices and imposes fines. I ignore the notices and refuse to pay the fines. Federal agents then come to seize my property. I, taking my gun out of my desk drawer, make whatever attempts I can to protect what is mine. Since I am a poor shot and there are many more of them, the outcome can be told in advance. They will win, and I will be dead. The purpose of this anecdote is to show that what distinguishes the government from the private sector is the power of coercion. In some ways the most insignificant government bureaucrat—the parking meter attendant, the IRS examiner, the guy at the Department of Motor Vehicles, the immigration official—has more power over me than the CEO of Dell Computer or General Electric. And this power of coercion, which is inherent in the nature of government, fundamentally undermines the claim that the government is doing a moral thing by helping people. Let me show why this is so. I am walking down the street, eating a sandwich, when I am approached by a hungry man. He wants to share my sandwich. Now if I give him the sandwich, I have done a good deed, and I feel good about it. The hungry man feels grateful to me, and even if he cannot repay me for my kindness, possibly he will try to help someone else when he has the chance. So this is a transaction that benefits both the giver and the receiver. But see what happens if the government gets involved. The government takes my sandwich from me by force. Consequently, I am a reluctant giver. The government then bestows my sandwich on the hungry man. Instead of being thankful to me, however, the man feels entitled to this benefit. In other words, the involvement of the state has utterly stripped the transaction of its moral value, even though the result is exactly the same. Now let’s keep the same scenario but change the outcome. I am approached by the hungry man, as before, but this time, instead of agreeing to share my sandwich, I refuse to do so. Along comes a third man, who pulls out a gun, points it at my head, and forces me to hand over my sandwich to him, upon which he gives it to the hungry guy. What is the moral quality of the gunman’s action? I think most people would consider him an unscrupulous thug who should be apprehended and punished. Yet when the government does precisely the same thing—forcibly seizing from some in order to give to others—the liberal insists the government is acting in a just and moral manner. This is clearly not true. “The era of Big Government is over,” Bill Clinton assured us. Although the welfare state has lost some of its legitimacy, the federal government is still too large and overbearing. Unlike big corporations, the federal government has the coercive power to confiscate our earnings and control our lives. Over the past few decades, the expansion of government has led to a diminished sense of freedom and personal responsibility. We must continue to work to limit the size of government. Ronald Reagan’s dictum remains pertinent: Big government is not the solution; big government is the problem. " http://www.hoover institute.org

Prole: per what was said above: College grads will make a shitload more scratch during their lifetimes. You went to school knowing this, made an "investment" decision and borrowed money to do so so as to reap the benefits that has historically been there for grads. Now, it appears to me, that you think you made a bad investment decision and want us, those who loaned you the money, to choke on it and forgive the loan. 2 things: 1st -the bulk of your earnings power will still be coming in the future years. You did make a good choice. You will be significantly further ahead of those who chose to go right to work and did not take the risk you did. 2nd) I just lost over quarter million bucks in a real estate "investment". Like you, I also "made an "investment" decision and borrowed money to do so so as to reap the benefits that has historically been there for" real estate investors. Now, I am asking you, should I get repaid - specifically -BY YOU? Should you, Prole give me money? Society benefited much more on my project that they ever will on you education I can assure you. If you answer yes on this, I will be in touch shortly...... BTW, I came from a dirt poor family, dirt poor like you do not have a clue about and may not have ever even seen. All of us kids went to and graduated from college, and only the first one, my older brother, borrowed a dime for it. My younger bro eventually got his masters and it was entirely funded by US (NOT THE US like as in the United States:-), via working and saving! There was no Government "loans" like you got (except my older brother), there was no family or parental money. We made that investment choice on our own. PS, bit of advice: you made the right choice and things will eventually turn out fine for you, just hang in there for a bit buddy, it can be tough right after school (I painted industrial buildings right after graduating)! It will get better, and the $ will start to flow for you - so don't despair!

Holy F* T, did the Aliens replace you with a pod people dude? Your post is right on the money AND polite: and I'm in total agreement as well. Russians do carry that issue around to this day. Most Americans have no idea the shit that the Russians had to endure alone while our prime contribution was sending them trucks as their cities got rickrolled by the Wehrmacht and massively leveled. BTW, the French folks were very warm and kind as well, despite, as you say and I also agree, the sh*t we've been pulling.

Ha ha! So true. I noticed that very thing last time I was in France, they seemed less than ....hmmm ... overwhelmed may be the word, perhaps overjoyed is closer to the truth, that we had committed our lives, our nation and our resources to bailing their butts out of WW1 and perhaps to a lesser amount, WW2. They're happy when we are doing it, but have short memories afterwards it seems to me. They have a strong memory of Gen Charles Seagull and a few partisans chasing Nazis out of Paris for instance and celebrate this in the WW2 Charles Seagaul museum, yet conveniently totally forget that the US had Paris surrounded on 3 sides and had left an escape route so the town wouldn't be leveled. I bet that comes off sounding like an old man there. BTW, the way Bush et al prosecuted and ramrodded the Iraq war, I think was poorly done unless you are celebrating the lone cowboy taking on the world thing. Piss Poor job. Damn I feel old sometimes.

OMG....truly sick! :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :

headcount: which one of you is in Oz now? I'm guessing they have plenty of DNA. link Police seek blow-up doll sex bandit Wed Jan 7, 9:34 am ET SYDNEY (Reuters) – An Australian man broke into three adult shops, had sex with blow up dolls named "Jungle Jane" and then dumped his plastic conquests in a nearby alley, local media reported Wednesday. "It's totally bizarre. It's a real concern that someone like that is out on the street," said one of the owners of the adult sex shops in Cairns in northern Queensland state. "He has been taking the dolls out the back and blowing them up and using the dolls and leaving them in the alley," the owner, who gave the name of Vogue, told the Cairns Post newspaper. Police told the Cairns Post that scientific officers had taken DNA samples, fingerprints and pictures of the crime scene. (Reporting by Pauline Askin, Editing by Dean Yates)

Link of text "Was I in a fit state to try? Well no, but then I have never been in a fit state to try any climb (When I climbed the Lesure route on the North Face of the Dru - scottish VI/VII, and a dam site harder then the Eiger Direct - I hadn't climbed for over a year!!!!). I'm not like Bracey, Powell, Cross etc who are genuinely full time climbers (athletes if you wish), and would race up a route like the direct in a few days. I'm an utterly normal person who finds fitting in even a days climbing in the 'gorms difficult, juggling kids, ex wife and girlfriend, many jobs and commitments - just like about 90% of climbers in the UK. Call me selfish? It's because I've always striven no to let climbing make me a heartless climbing obsessed bastard that gets me into these scrapes in the first place. What I have in my favor is not a six pack and a marathon physique (since when did being skinny make you a good mountaineer?), but a stubbornness, and willingness to both try something difficult with as big a safety margin as possible, and most importantly be willing to fail. My book and website may have the word psycho in it, but I think if you ask anyone who's climbed with me, and you'll find I'm probably one of the most paranoid climbers around."

Good post T. However, when I was in the military, they had what they called "Military Justice". If these guys get the same (as enemy combatants) it's not Duct tape and bailing wire....exactly....of course it's not exactly an OJ trial either. It is due process, which is more than they are getting now. Suspending habeous corpus shouldn't be an option damnit, this is the United States of America fer Christs sakes, we are the home of the free and the land of the brave. Well, we might have been at some point back when. These jackasses should get due process and the right to confront their accusers or get kicked loose and Obama is the dude to do it. Unlawful imprisonment (slavery) was a long time in our past, lets not revisit that. Even 2001 was a long time ago, this jackass may not even have that mullet cause he's bald from aging now. Maybe they could still get him on the Mullet charge like you guys say, but kicking him loose looks like what they should do to make it right imo. It's total bullshit. 2 of my old army buddies had to guard a shitload of asswipes that Castro rousted out of jail and sent here. They were mean nasty thieving, lying, cheating Sons of Bitches. Castro was smart to clear out the worst prisoners and send them here. We took them too. But they eventually even got let loose and got freedom and I bet some of them turned out to STILL be murdering thieving bastards afterwards. Some of these dudes like Mulletboy may only be guilty of thought crime.

I saw that Russian professors prediction and discounted it STP. My top priority is earthquakeproofing the house. We've been discussing it for @ 5 months, but it's time. This just has to be high on my list as this thing is over 100 years old and has no foundation bolts. I'd been mulling and mulling how to bolt it down when I saw the Simpson Universal Foundation Plate seismic plates # upf-10 which were recently developed to fix this very issue on old homes -ie, where you can't get to the mud sill to drill a conventional anchor bolt. However, we still have a brick foundation which will be the support for all of it! http://www.strongtie.com/ftp/fliers/F-PLANS07.pdf Appears to be the best way to retrofit an old piece of shit house which has no foundation bolts and no room to put them in. Next are some good ideas for us all: 1)Pay off debt and save some cash. As the dollar will most likely be devalued. Perhaps dramatically. 2) Having goods -critical things you need would be high on the list and perhaps more important as well. 3) Put a percentage of whats left into Gold. You can also get a FDIC insured Chinese Rimbaud/Yuan denominated savings account at Everbank to offset the dollar decline as well. 4) I have the guns and ammo thing covered, don't carry it around and hope I never do, but it's there. A single 870 shotgun can cover a lot of bases and it's cheap, legal, versatile (everything from quail to bad guys will be quaking) and accurate. 5) More importantly, have a food and 10 essentials stash (include some small denomination bills here). This is most likely the things most of us will be taking on our next camping trip anyway. Stove, sleeping bags, tents, flashlights etc etc. Just keep it together and handy so you can find it in the dark if need be, water filters should be #1 on the list. Mountain House freeze dried #10 tins will last for 25 years or so...lets see, I'm 54 now, so that's.....damn, I'll be dead before it goes. Anyway, good idea and it tastes good and is easy to prepare. I have an issue in that having a emergency kit may be moot if the house shakes down and the f*ing thing is in the basement under the rubble....but whats a mother to do:-) Ahhh, thats it, put one at my mother or brothers house! Bro lives in a place we completed last August. (dont' ask how that $ real estate investment gamble went last year! ) Anyhow, that's my thoughts. I see Bacher and Bridwell may separately are having money problems and may be loosing their homes: renting out a basement room isn't a bad idea - wishing you all well.

...and yet here I am with you all.... (I support the ACLU as I generally love the ENTIRE checks and balances thing. Which the "Free" press use to be part of as well - I say "use to be": you can Google and read up on operation Mockingbird or check the black hole that is the CIAS funding today for that sorid story)

It's likely the authorities fucked themselves 6 ways to Sunday on this. Most likely They cannot put him up for trial with introducing evidence of how they undoubtedly did things that many civilized people call torture. They probably can't even introduce evidence of why they picked him up in the first place as that would give the ACLU standing to sue the gov't asswipes on the 100% phone tap program that they most likely utilized to grab Mulletboy there to begin with. They should just have him swear on the Koran and his mothers grave he'll play nice and kick his ass back to his home. Sleeper cell my ass. What a bunch of crap. You cannot have a sleeper cell be successful unless its a secret, note to the pentagon, it's not a secret anymore...let him go and toss his sorry butt to the curb somewhere in the middle east. Total bullshit with a some shred of credibility 7 years ago....maybe. This isn't about Mulletboy though: this is bedrock shit about rights and processes that are impeded in our fundamental laws which the President swears to uphold but isn't. Fuckers.

You say you want a revolution Well, you know We all want to change the world. You tell me that it's evolution, Well, you know We all want to change the world. But when you talk about destruction, Don't you know that you can count me out. In. Don't you know it's going to be all right, all right, all right. You say you got a real solution Well, you know We'd all love to see the plan. You ask me for a contribution, Well, you know We all do what we can. If you want money for people with minds that hate, All I can tell you is brother you have to wait. Don't you know it's going to be all right, all right, all right. You say you'll change a constitution Well, you know We'd all love to change your head. You tell me it's the institution, Well, you know You better free your mind instead. But if you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao, You ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow. Don't you know it's going to be all right, all right, all right.

Oh oh oh oh oh oh You don't have to go, oh oh oh oh You don't have to go, oh oh oh oh You don't have to go I I I I I I All those tears I cry, I I I I All those tears I cry, oh oh, I I Baby, please don't go When I read the letter you wrote me it made me mad mad mad When I read the words that it told me It made me sad sad sad But I still love you so I can't let you go I love you Ooh baby I love you Oh oh oh oh oh oh Every breath I take, oh oh oh oh Oh, every move I make Oh baby please, don't go I I I I I I You hurt me to my soul, oh oh oh oh You hurt me to my soul, oh oh-hoh Darling please don't go When I read the letter you sent me It made me mad mad mad When I read the news that it brought me It made me sad sad sad But I still love you so And I can't let you go I love you Ooh baby, I love you (Guitar Solo) Oh oh oh oh oh oh You don't have to go, oh oh oh oh You don't have to go, oh oh oh oh Oh, baby, babe, please, please, please, please Oh oh, oh oh, oh oh, baby Oh oh I really love you baby Ooh ooh, ooh ooh, ooh ooh, darlin' Oh oh Oh baby, I still love you so Oh baby, I still love you so Oh oooh Oh oh oh oh oh oh, yeah Ah ah ah ah ah ah, ohhh Ah ah ah ah ah Oooooh, yeah Ah, baby baby