scott_harpell
Members-
Posts
4384 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by scott_harpell
-
no. they tend not too rob you. if you are gonna have to go toe to toe with a gun toter over $20, you got some problems.
-
my point you imbecile is that it does not matter what is easier to attack with, the same amount are being attacked ergardless fo the avalability of guns. it appears that if someone wants to kill you, they will do it any way they can. did you live under power lines as a kid? jeeezus!
-
are you talking about the teertiary points? the ones that are right behind teh frotn points and are longer than the others (in most crampons)?
-
i am using multiple computers... comp. lab at school.
-
At what point did I say that the CDC report was valid? I'm just pointing out that catbirdseat did the research, and you have your head up your ass. he didn't say you did. he is asking if you are gonna try and refute the CDC. quite the challenge i would say.
-
Ummm, that's a document that was written 227 years ago. yeah fuck freedom of speech too that's way old skewl.
-
will. i would have to say that i agree with you. but i do differ on one point. this set precedence in teh PNW. it has moved the bolted TR into the mountains. sure it isn't far into the mountains, but it is a precident that i would rather we didn't take. it is that much easier for the next person to justify doing it somewhere else more touchy. i really couldn't give a shit about that area, but the precidence it is setting is not in character with the PNW scene IMHO.
-
damn! i just had the winning click to put us ahead of cincinatti! for me... except for the whole being at school thing.
-
isn't that kinda the point; that people will kill each other regardless of the impliments involved? oh and happy un-thanksgiving dru! It's more a reflection of a much lower incidence of murder-by-firearm. Since a lower proportion of murders are committed using guns, it's inevitable that the proportion involving "other" weapons will be higher, be they knives or baseball bats or poison-tipped arrows or whatever else was handy at the time. But I think you'll also find that Canadians are far less likely to kill one another overall than are Americans, regardless of method used. I don't have a ready explanation for that one, but I expect the Fraser Institute can find a way to portray our lower murder rates as further proof of the inferiority of our criminal justice system and the moral corruption of our political structures. Either that, or they'll ignore it altogether because it doesn't further their agenda. but if the violence is the same with or without... then it doesn't really matter does it? seems like anyone who kills someone else is pretty much psycho and will do it with a knife or a spoon if they have to. HEy Scottywad, you try to kill me with a spoon I'll kick your Get a clue ! A gun is much easier to kill with thana spoon -j obviously you are missing the point ace.
-
tabloid... and i work in both places. fwiw
-
especially when they really do have your size; though mabe not at the store you went to.
-
isn't that kinda the point; that people will kill each other regardless of the impliments involved? oh and happy un-thanksgiving dru! It's more a reflection of a much lower incidence of murder-by-firearm. Since a lower proportion of murders are committed using guns, it's inevitable that the proportion involving "other" weapons will be higher, be they knives or baseball bats or poison-tipped arrows or whatever else was handy at the time. But I think you'll also find that Canadians are far less likely to kill one another overall than are Americans, regardless of method used. I don't have a ready explanation for that one, but I expect the Fraser Institute can find a way to portray our lower murder rates as further proof of the inferiority of our criminal justice system and the moral corruption of our political structures. Either that, or they'll ignore it altogether because it doesn't further their agenda. but if the violence is the same with or without... then it doesn't really matter does it? seems like anyone who kills someone else is pretty much psycho and will do it with a knife or a spoon if they have to.
-
why will? if anything, this should be more frowned upon than @ 38. if i wanna make a mixed line up prussik... is that copasthetic? just cause the routes are hard doesn't make it ok. lemme know, cause i got a sweet 7 pitch M9 i wanna put up on SCW. i need donations for the approx 450 bolts i will place. send donations to www.verticalmanifestdestiny.com thanks!
-
isn't that kinda the point; that people will kill each other regardless of the impliments involved? oh and happy un-thanksgiving dru!
-
hot damn! looks like someone else wants some turkey.
-
My response is this: you're a lame fuck for trying to hitch bullshit politics to the Thanksgiving holiday. Pretty much the same way it's lame that displaying the flag has been conflated with being a right wing tool. If you can't manage to wish a happy holiday without pushing your political views at the same time, then its not a holiday here... so i'm gonna keep on the keepin' on aight?
-
bull shit! right-wing fucking conspiracy! cdc... i take everything they say with a grain of salt cause it always makes my points look weak and tends to go against my parties 'core beliefs.' right wing fasctists!
-
Found: Grivel Mont Blanc ice axe on Pilchuck
scott_harpell replied to catbirdseat's topic in Lost and Found
its not that hard to get all the way up if you ahve any winter driving skills at all and decent clearance. plus, its funner than shit! -
On Line Mini-guide to the Wapiti Valley
scott_harpell replied to Ed_Seedhouse's topic in British Columbia/Canada
thanks guy! -
i read that the railway was no longer owned by B.C. rail as of yesterday. wonder if that will effect access? prolly not
-
i only eat human meat... and only U.S. citicens. Euros are too gamey. Here, its all pre-plumped.
-
what is the chondroitin supposed to do? is it another joint suppliment, or it is for somethign else entirely. i see these two paired up quite regularly.
-
yeah... sure... but if they get shot, who cares? Ooops, sorry, I wasn't arguing this point. I am with you there - if they get shot in the field of battle, well, that is the risks of doing that job. Of course, I can't say I agree with the rest of your analysis, but I don't think we will ever agree on the role and contributions of media! Off to a meeting... isn't that what everyone here is arguing?!?!
