Fairweather

Of course. The Jewish conspiracy. A cornerstone of the unstable left. (Never mind the $$ we give Egypt, Jordan, etc, etc... that's all well and good. ) Not sure how tools like Joseph and j_b/Prole walk past mirrors these days.

I see you've graciously added Palestinians to your slate of "issues". A nice touch, but you're not really fooling anyone here. Your past rhetoric shows clearly your hatred for Israel in general, and Jews in particular no-matter said issue has less to do with Islam than it does Arab nationalism. If you look in today's news you'll find the latest Hamas response to Israeli (and Obama's) peace overtures. MOTS.

Damn straight... http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/08/20/tea-party-crasher-resigns-getting-ax/?test=latestnews The Oregon teacher who declared his mission to “dismantle and demolish” the Tea Party movement resigned before getting the ax, a school spokeswoman told FoxNews.com. “He resigned earlier this week, on Monday,” Maureen Wheeler of the Beaverton School District said. “He resigned in lieu of termination.” Wheeler said Levin learned the results of the district’s investigation and resigned. She would not comment on those investigative results. Conestoga Middle School media lab teacher Jason Levin became national news back in April when he announced his intention to bring down the Tea Party on his “Crash the Tea Party” website and in media interviews. The now-ex Conestoga Middle School media lab teacher said in April that he would seek to embarrass Tea Partiers by attending their rallies dressed as Adolf Hitler, carrying signs bearing racist, sexist and anti-gay epithets and acting as offensively as possible -- anything short of throwing punches. In a post on his now defunct website, Levin once called on his supporters to collect the Social Security numbers—among other personal identifying information—about as many Tea Party supporters as possible at rallies taking place across the country on Tax Day."Some other thoughts are to ask people at the rally to sign a petition renouncing socialism. See just how much info you can get from these folks (name address, DOB, Social Security #). The more data we can mine from the Tea Partiers, the more mayhem we can cause with it!!!!" he wrote. In an April interview with Talking Points Memo, Levin said of his plans, "Our goal is that whenever a Tea Partier says 'Barack Obama was not born in America,' we're going be right there next to them saying, 'Yeah, in fact he wasn't born on Earth! He's an alien!'" Complaints from around the nation flooded the school district’s office and Levin was suspended in April as the school district investigated whether he had used school time or resources to engage in political activism. The state’s licensing board also launched its own investigation. On Friday, the Oregonian reported that the teacher’s state licensing board is still conducting their own investigation into Levin.

Liar! Jackass! Neanderthal! Racist! Corporate shill! Um, do any of these sound familiar, junior?

Dennis Kucinich Hillary Clinton

THIS IS THE REPRIEVE FROM ECONOMIC GROWTH-ADDICTION AND RAMPANT CONSUMERISM THAT LEFTISTS EVERYWHERE HAVE BEEN PRAYING TO ALLAH FOR! AND IT'S ALL THANKS TO GEORGE W BUSH!!

Libtards on NPR preaching religious tolerance. Gotta love it!

Neanderthals. Oligarchy. Plutocracy. Regressives. Corporate shills. Southern strategy. Like a wind-up doll that repeats itself oblivious to any and all inputs, you're too fucking dumb to know when you're being mocked. This is beyond sad.

I have a picture of j_b that may help you understand:

I don't have any idea what "satisfied" stands for. Do you? It's also suspect that your graph is compiled by the very organization that is providing the services. It is kind of amusing that medicaid "customers" are only 51% satisfied with their coverage; but, then again, I guess I'm not happy with every Christmas or birthday gift I receive either...

I suppose claim denial could be considered an "efficiency", but the humanity of Medicare's denial rate should give pause to those on your side of the fence who think single-payer will be some kind of panacea.

It's quite possible. After all, they're more than willing to take food stamps away from the poor in order to avoid the horror of contributing so much as a dime to their medical premiums--or giving up that boat/RV combo they've had parked in the driveway for years.

...if only the average public-sector employee earned a mere "living wage" and was given only "average benefits". But then, in any event, I'm not really sure what an unemployed sloth like you is so concerned about.

Slam dunk.

Well done, KK. I hear you want to join me on my CNMtAdiOD?

There is a great campground at Buck/Ranger Creek between the airstrip and the White River. All you need is a Forest Pass. They have pit toilets and fire rings. Light on rules.

Don't fall for this shit, Bill. Like JayB said above, what you're seeing here is nothing more than state union employees putting their own interests (in the form of extraordinary pay and benefits) above those of the poor. Behold the "caring" nature of Democrats.

...and, after all Rob, it's really just about making them suffer, right? Libtard logic = dead end.

Yes, Feck, the wealthy (and middle class) who shelled out the $4 million you didn't have...

You mean the wealthy who are already footing a grossly disproportionate share of the total tax take? You mean the wealthy whose business ventures (and yes, lifestyles) provide jobs for millions of Americans? Your class-envy bullshit leads to nowhere but social upheaval. How 'bout the bottom 46% of wage-earners start contributing something to the federal tax pie? Or at least shut up about what a supposedly shitty--albeit free--deal they're getting.

You're in denial. The Democrats voted for it, Obama signed it. Nobody "forced" them to do anything. Are you retarded? The republicans who voted for the bill demanded the offsets as the price of their votes and the cash had to come from somewhere; no democrat wanted to cut those programs nor would they have if not for those crossover republicans. Do I hear you and republicans screaming for similar offsets to pay for any extension of W's giveaway to the rich? I'm sure some wealthy folks will end up on foodstamps if those unpaid for tax cuts aren't extended. Are you a moron? Democrats had all the House votes they needed on this bill--and with Olympia Snow helping them in the Senate earlier, they even had a filibuster-proof majority over there. Trying to blame Republicans for enabling the public union sector handout that the Democrats just foisted on the American taxpayer is more than a bit disingenuous. Then for your messiah to stand in front of the cameras and claim it was all "paid for" with the closure of corporate tax loopholes, well, I think you need to pull your head out of your ideology.

You're in denial. The Democrats voted for it, Obama signed it. Nobody "forced" them to do anything.

they're

Here you go j_b. Behold the depths to which your public-sector union stooges, lying president, and shape-shifting House Speaker will plumb. From a source I know you'll appreciate: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kati-haycock/cutting-food-stamps-to-sa_b_674770.html "Though many in the education community are celebrating last week's Senate vote for the so-called Edujobs bill, I can't find any joy in it. In fact, I am shaken and ashamed because, to pay for it, the Senate snatched $11.9 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. That's right: They cut food stamps. For the first time ever, this move would gouge the monthly benefits that low-income families receive. Beginning in 2014, America's poorest families will--if the House concurs during a special session this week--see $59 disappear from their food stamp benefits every single month. The families and individuals who depend on food stamps are our nation's most vulnerable. They tend to be the young, the old, the black, and the brown. They now total more than 40 million Americans. And despite cold, inside-the-Beltway rationalizations that food prices have not risen as steeply as had been anticipated--and that this cut will "just" return benefits to pre-2009 levels--I challenge any who support it to feed their own children on $4.50 a day. That's the average per-person benefit now, before the Senate cut takes effect. It is no wonder, then, that experts predict the passage of this bill will put more families back in lines at soup kitchens and food banks. That's why so many social justice and faith-based groups are expressing strong opposition to the proposed cuts. Politicians know that there are less ruthless ways to pay for this than by slashing food stamps. Oil and gas and other corporate subsidies, for example, could withstand the blow far better than the poorest people in this nation. But families who rely on public support don't wield much political influence. After all, when you don't have enough money to buy your children dinner, it's hard to find room in your budget for a lobbyist or a fat campaign contribution. Most shockingly of all, the education community--particularly those who assert that it's all but impossible to teach impoverished children who come to school hungry or overwhelmed by family stress--is cheering the passage of this bill with its hateful trade-off. We'd all do well to remember this proposal and those who supported it the next time teacher union bosses assert that they are fighting for what's best for our nation's poor kids."