ivan Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Uh, yea, well that bubble was not one of the choices. And after this dem-o-crat debacle it won't be for a long, long time. weren't you the feller floating pictures of unicorns the other page? reality is, you get two choices in this here country. should i have had more faith in mickey-caine n' bible-spice? Quote
prole Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 should i have had more faith in mickey-caine n' bible-spice? Â Yes, the Know-Nothing wing and the Do-Nothing wing are getting together for some big ideas next time around! Â Quote
AlpineK Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Fairweather in a fit of rage? Â [video:youtube]YersIyzsOpc Quote
Fairweather Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 should i have had more faith in mickey-caine n' bible-spice? Â Yes, the Know-Nothing wing and the Do-Nothing wing are getting together for some big ideas next time around! Â Hmmm, much better than the I'll-do-anything-I-want autocrat that you elected. Exactly where does he get this new power to change acts of Congress like the ACA at will? Â Hillary Clinton, now there's a real go-getter. You guys would do better with Elizabeth Warren. Which isn't saying much. Quote
JayB Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 On the smoking and "bad choices" issue, having a single payer system would probably motivate the State to take on some of the entrenched interests that have been peddling known poisons with impunity for decades. I see a black market for Ho-Hos in our future... Fine by me, freedom isn't free.  Not always quite as simple as that when the state is the entrenched interest that's doing the peddling.  http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/11/oregon_lottery_agency_pushes_s.html  I think the more likely outcome is clumsy attempts to determine the tax rate that optimizes revenue from ding-dongs and ho'-ho's under the pretext of promoting public health, and then finding creative ways for the bureaucracy that's pocketing the money itself to pretend that all of the naked self-dealing it's doing is in the public interest.  Here's another example: http://freakonomics.com/2010/11/18/freakonomics-radio-could-a-lottery-be-the-answer-to-americas-poor-savings-rate/  The answer, in short, is no - not if state lottery boards have anything to do with it.  Even Lenin, Stalin, and Mao - probably *especially* Lenin and Mao would have a hearty chuckle over the idea that people magically turn benevolent once they start getting paid by the state and wielding political power. How have you managed to hang onto your touching idealism so far into adulthood - comrade?   Quote
JayB Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Â What a weird world you've invented in which healthcare is withheld if the illness is "their fault" -- is it lonely over there? indeed, for a man who fears Big Gubimint micro-managing our freedoms, where do you see the rabbit-hole of deciding which human behaviors deserve coverage or not hits bottom? hot chicks have to pay ten times higher premiums b/c they're 10X more likely to get the clap? no coverage for donut-fans? no covering tendon-pulls nor rectal sores for gay sport climbers? Â at any rate, the big boozers, bastards, brawlers n' butt-smokers i've known over the years are/were inveterate doctor-haters and don't generally use any of the services they pay for in their youth and usually accept death pretty rapidly when it wanders their way in the form of cancer, heart-failure, etc. Â Â The alternative to "withholding care" from people who have unhealthy lifestyles or dangerous habits is a system where they pay higher premiums and the state leaves them alone. Â I'm surprised to learn that you prefer the alternative. Quote
ivan Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 healthcare should be universal and paid for by government which funds itself through taxes, not premiums to private companies Quote
prole Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Â What a weird world you've invented in which healthcare is withheld if the illness is "their fault" -- is it lonely over there? indeed, for a man who fears Big Gubimint micro-managing our freedoms, where do you see the rabbit-hole of deciding which human behaviors deserve coverage or not hits bottom? hot chicks have to pay ten times higher premiums b/c they're 10X more likely to get the clap? no coverage for donut-fans? no covering tendon-pulls nor rectal sores for gay sport climbers? Â at any rate, the big boozers, bastards, brawlers n' butt-smokers i've known over the years are/were inveterate doctor-haters and don't generally use any of the services they pay for in their youth and usually accept death pretty rapidly when it wanders their way in the form of cancer, heart-failure, etc. Â Â The alternative to "withholding care" from people who have unhealthy lifestyles or dangerous habits is a system where they pay higher premiums and the state leaves them alone. Â I'm surprised to learn that you prefer the alternative. Â And yet those most at risk of health problems associated with unhealthy lifestyles are those least able to bear the costs of higher taxes on cheap food and higher premiums. Somehow other governments have managed to nudge their people in the right direction and enforce more stringent regulations on food without succumbing to your tired stalinototalitarian nightmare fantasy. Quote
rob Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 healthcare should be universal and paid for by government which funds itself through taxes, not premiums to private companies  Oh, you mean letting people die isn't the only choice? Weird! Quote
Fairweather Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 The party of Free Lunch never bothers itself with details or "what if" scenarios. Remember, Jay, we're talking free healthcare here!* Â Â Â Â *a minor 900 dollar per month handling fee and other bureaucratic pension fees may apply. your premiums may be more than advertised. Quote
prole Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 So in your world, no one benefits from a healthier society (bad word, I know) as a whole except for the individual directly effected by administered care. Got it. Quote
rob Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 *a minor 900 dollar per month handling fee and other bureaucratic pension fees may apply. your premiums may be more than advertised. Â Expensive health care premiums? YAY FOR THE FOR-PROFIT MEDICAL INDUSTRY AND PRIVATE INSURANCE!!! amirite? Â USA! USA! USA! Quote
prole Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 (edited) Mars needs a conservative, FW. All the isolated individualism, free of any social constraint that one could dream of... Edited December 5, 2013 by prole Quote
Fairweather Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 Somehow other governments have managed to nudge their people in the right direction and enforce more stringent regulations on food... Â Yes, we've already seen how you guys do it. Â Quote
rob Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Somehow other governments have managed to nudge their people in the right direction and enforce more stringent regulations on food...  Yes, we've already seen how you guys do it.   I think you're doing it wrong, it's more like this    Quote
prole Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Gaaack, don't you remember the Franco-Swedish Single-Payer Death Camps from the 70's?!?! Quote
prole Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Single Payer today and it's a greased chute straight to those Matrix bio-energy harvesting pod thingies!! Quote
ivan Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Somehow other governments have managed to nudge their people in the right direction and enforce more stringent regulations on food...  Yes, we've already seen how you guys do it.  chinese communists acted no different than the chinese autocrats before them - as the american tradition, with all its warts, hasn't been prone to killings its citizens willy-nilly (well, the white ones at least) i'm pretty certain we can get us some gubimint healthcare w/o resorting to the gulag or the death-camp  it is a mighty fine bugabo to try to pin on the other side when your position is weapons-grade retarded though Quote
Fairweather Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 i only chain-smoke when putting Capitalist Fat-Cats against the wall for Special Attention Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 I've found in my public speaking that persuasion is 1/10th statistics and 9/10ths decades old black and whites from the Pol Pot/Stalinist/your-go-to-shock-shot. Â Connecting the dots from opposite ends of the solar system is what thought leaders do. Quote
ivan Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 i only chain-smoke when putting Capitalist Fat-Cats against the wall for Special Attention i know all your spray g-spots, esse  it might shock you to learn though that i've...like...you know...never actually killed anybody Quote
rob Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 The conservative organism's ability to isolate itself from reality as a means of resolving cognitive dissonance is really quite an impressive feat of evolution Quote
Fairweather Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 Connecting the dots from opposite ends of the solar system is what thought leaders do. Â Good God, now there's an asperger rehearsed self improvement cassette tape if ever there was Quote
prole Posted December 5, 2013 Posted December 5, 2013 Thought leaders...sounds fishy. I prefer to get my ideas about the world from reality television, the conservative punditry, and superficial literalist readings of 200 year old texts. Quote
Fairweather Posted December 5, 2013 Author Posted December 5, 2013 Yea, thought leaders--like Marx and Gramsci. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.