tvashtarkatena Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 We can finally blow the lid off this chemtrail thing. Quote
ivan Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 Yeah, I'm not a big fan, but more 'cause it's been shown that these shows constitute the primary news source for a disturbingly large number of liberals. show me your internutz searching skillz are better than mine - i recall recently reading/hearing a study that showed the very opposite, but didn't find it in the 30 seconds i allowed myself to look for it okay fine, "john stewart viewers more informed" is google-worthy - seems the topic has been kicked about plenty impartial take on the subject? Quote
kevbone Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 Is there any John Stewart type shows from the right that makes fun of the left? Thats what I thought. Why? Because it is hard to make fun of reality. Quote
G-spotter Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 Bloomberg calls current GOP candidates idiots: http://gothamist.com/2011/11/04/bloomberg_thinks_gop_presidential_c.php Quote
ivan Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 Thats what I thought. Why? Because it is hard to make fun of reality. it's easy to make fun of reality, it just takes creativity and a sense of irony, neither of which literalist conservatives do well Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 Or however many nights that was. Two and counting... ...but I'm sure they were isolated incidents. Yeah. They always are. like Lewinsky, Jones, Flowers... isolated "but we're electing a president not a pope!" "censure and move on!" Fucking hypocritical douchenozzle libtards Quote
ivan Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 (edited) dunno 'bout the other liberal douchebags 'round here, but i sure am hoping the elephants move on and give big man cain the nod! how wierd would the election history be when obama wins two elections against two different nutballs named 'cain? Edited November 4, 2011 by ivan Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 dunno 'bout the other liberal douchebags 'round here, but i sure am hoping the elephants move on and give big man cain the nod! how wierd would the election history be when obama wins two elections against two different nutballs named 'cain? Don't worry Ivan, I know you wallow in the gutter knowingly. Your bear-claw-guzzling friend's feigning moral outrage is just fucking laughable, especially in light of all his heros recent marital downfalls and shortcomings (Edwards, Gore, Clinton). Quote
j_b Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 Since we are in the 21st century there are no laws against marital infidelity, not quite the same as for sexual harassment. Mind you I am for going after all pols that play more righteous than you to eventually show how hypocritical they are. Quote
kevbone Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 dunno 'bout the other liberal douchebags 'round here, but i sure am hoping the elephants move on and give big man cain the nod! how wierd would the election history be when obama wins two elections against two different nutballs named 'cain? Don't worry Ivan, I know you wallow in the gutter knowingly. Your bear-claw-guzzling friend's feigning moral outrage is just fucking laughable, especially in light of all his heros recent marital downfalls and shortcomings (Edwards, Gore, Clinton). Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 My heroes are limited to Mark Twain and Mighty Mouse, but thanks for asking. I guess if a libtard did it previously it's all good. Rfucks! Go figure! Oh well, the scandal's giving the Hermanator a chance to finally go full Bozo on national TV...and I must say he's doing an AWESOME job of it. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 BTW, pan o chocolat kicks ass on bear claws any day. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 Since we are in the 21st century there are no laws against marital infidelity, not quite the same as for sexual harassment. Mind you I am for going after all pols that play more righteous than you to eventually show how hypocritical they are. "innocent until proven guilty" "we must wait until all the facts are known" and crimes were associated with my examples, btw Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 dunno 'bout the other liberal douchebags 'round here, but i sure am hoping the elephants move on and give big man cain the nod! how wierd would the election history be when obama wins two elections against two different nutballs named 'cain? Don't worry Ivan, I know you wallow in the gutter knowingly. Your bear-claw-guzzling friend's feigning moral outrage is just fucking laughable, especially in light of all his heros recent marital downfalls and shortcomings (Edwards, Gore, Clinton). Not as exciting as Diamond Dave's hairy chest or Pamela Lee's implants, I know, boner, but do try to expand a bit. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 What good is a top executive position if you can't get a little 20-something nookie out of it? ...or a $100K payout... Sheeit, at least Dems can manage to seal the deal, but Rfucks aren't exactly the go to party when it comes to good sex. "Now, lay perfectly still..." Quote
j_b Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 (edited) "innocent until proven guilty" "we must wait until all the facts are known" and crimes were associated with my examples, btw Cain refused to give the facts, which naturally allowed to speculate he was hiding something. The crimes in your examples weren't about marital infidelity. Edited November 4, 2011 by j_b Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 Since we are in the 21st century there are no laws against marital infidelity, not quite the same as for sexual harassment. Mind you I am for going after all pols that play more righteous than you to eventually show how hypocritical they are. "innocent until proven guilty" "we must wait until all the facts are known" and crimes were associated with my examples, btw Last time I checked these weren't 'allegations' awaiting 'proof', but facts. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 Shit, i didn't mean to levy the 'F' word on an Rfuck. They tend to stare into the distance and go into a minor coma at the concept. It's just not in 'em, ya know? Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 (edited) "innocent until proven guilty" "we must wait until all the facts are known" and crimes were associated with my examples, btw Cain refused to give the facts, which naturally allowed to speculate he was hiding something. The crimes in your examples weren't about marital infidelity. Clinton was accused of sexual harassment you dipshit. and there was a huge fucking settlement, BTW Edited November 4, 2011 by KaskadskyjKozak Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 SO, let me get this straight, Kakester. You're defending the Hermanator's right to sexually harass the (much younger) women who worked for him, right? EEEeeeeewwwww. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 "innocent until proven guilty" "we must wait until all the facts are known" and crimes were associated with my examples, btw Cain refused to give the facts, which naturally allowed to speculate he was hiding something. The crimes in your examples weren't about marital infidelity. Trial in the court of public opinion! Guilty... you must be hiding something. Man you are a joke. Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 Ya know, I don't recall any of us libtards here ever defending any Dems right to sexually harass anyone. Ever. So, what was it about the Hermanator's sexual harassment that you found OK, there, Kakester? Is he being treated 'unfairly'? LOL Quote
tvashtarkatena Posted November 4, 2011 Posted November 4, 2011 "innocent until proven guilty" "we must wait until all the facts are known" and crimes were associated with my examples, btw Cain refused to give the facts, which naturally allowed to speculate he was hiding something. The crimes in your examples weren't about marital infidelity. Trial in the court of public opinion! Guilty... you must be hiding something. Man you are a joke. Nope, not opinion. We're just going by the facts. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.